عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(183): "Ruling on Combining an Ijarah and a Conditioned Hibah"

Date Added : 15-11-2015

Resolution No.(183)(16/2012) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

"Ruling on Combining an Ijarah and a Conditioned  Hibah"

Date: 5/2/1434 AH, corresponding to 19/12/2012 A.D

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

On the aforementioned date, the Board reviewed the ruling of Islamic Sharia on combining the lease contract of a property with a binding promise to grant that property to the tenant after the leasing period ends.

After researching and deliberating, the Board decided the following:

Combining the lease of a property with the promise of granting it (property) to the tenant if the latter complies with the conditions set by the landlord is an example of combined contracts that don`t violate  Islamic Sharia. In addition, there is no Sharia text that forbids the combination of such contracts.

This is because Ijarah (Leasing) is a binding contract whose rent and period are defined and agreed upon by the contracting parties. Similarly, Hibah (Donation/Grant) is a donation contract  which is permissible to be conditioned, as stated by some Hanbalite scholars. Combining them involves no risk since the tenant is able to make full use of the property/house and since he had agreed to the amount of the rent in the first place.

The Malikites` Mufti in Makah, Sheikh Mohammad Bin Ali, passed away in 1367 A.H, stated: "As for examples of Ijarah and Hibah-which are similar to the sale transaction in terms of rulings and conditions- it is permissible to combine any of them with the sale transaction. It is also permissible to combine both of them in one contract because they aren`t contradictory." [Tahtheeb Al-Forooq]

Resolution No.(4/12) of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy states that the above form of transaction is permissible. This has also been confirmed by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions/standard (9,8/1) as well as the Fatwa committees in the Muslim World.

All the above is permitted under the condition that the contracting parties abide by the rulings concerning rent throughout the lease period. When applying such transactions, Islamic banks are obliged to comply with all the Sharia standards in this regard. And Allah Knows Best.

 

The Grand Mufti of Jordan / His Eminence Sheikh AbdulKareem al-Khasawneh

Prof. Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi / Member

Dr. Yahia al-Botoosh / Member

Sheikh Sae`id Hijjawi / Member

Dr. Wasif al-Bakhri / Member

Prof. Mohammad al-Qhodat / Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh / Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair Al-Esa / Member

Dr. Mohammad  al-Z`obi / Member

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

How is the beginning of Ramadan determined?

1. Completing 30 days of Sha‘ban, or
2. Sighting the crescent moon after sunset on the 29th day of Sha‘ban.
It is Sunnah to search for the moon, and it is obligatory to follow the official authorities responsible for announcing it.

Is it permissible for one who sacrifices on behalf of another, with the latter's permission, to eat from the sacrifice?

It is permissible for someone who sacrificed on behalf of another with their permission to eat from it with their permission, and they stand in their place (act as their representative) in distributing it.
 
It is stated in Nihayat al-Muhtaj ila Sharh al-Minhaj (Vol.8/P.141): "And he—meaning the one sacrificing on his own behalf, provided he has not apostatized—has the right to eat from a voluntary sacrifice and his sacrificial gift; rather, it is recommended. As for an obligatory sacrifice, it is forbidden for him to eat from it, whether it was designated as such initially or as a liability in his dhimmah. And excluded by what has preceded is if he sacrifices on behalf of another, or if he apostatized, then it is not permissible for him to eat from it, just as it is absolutely impermissible to feed a disbeliever from it."(The text I found indicates the impermissibility of eating) ???
 
And it is stated in Hashiyat al-Jamal ‘ala Sharh al-Manhaj (Vol.5/P.262): "If a person offers a sacrifice on behalf of a living person with their permission, does he act as their representative in distributing it—on the grounds that permission to sacrifice is permission to distribute it—or does it depend on their explicit permission? This requires consideration, but the first view is not far-fetched." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the Sharia basis of the Udhiyah?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
The Sharia basis of the Udhiyah (sacrificial offering) is firmly established through the Quran, the Sunnah, and the Consensus (Ijma') of the Muslims:
1. Evidence from the Holy Quran
Allah the Exalted says {what means}: "And the camels and cattle We have appointed for you as among the symbols of Allah; for you therein is good." [Al-Hajj/36]. He also says {what means}: "So pray to your Lord and sacrifice [to Him alone]" [Al-Kawthar/2]. According to the most well-known scholarly interpretations of this verse, "prayer" refers to the Eid prayer, and "sacrifice" refers to the slaughtering of the Udhiyah.
2. Evidence from the Sunnah
Al-Bara' bin 'Azib (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet ﷺ said: "The first thing we start with on this day of ours is to pray, then we return and sacrifice. Whoever does that has followed our Sunnah, and whoever slaughters before [the prayer], it is merely meat he has provided for his family; it is not part of the ritual sacrifice in any way" [Reported by Bukhari & Muslim].
Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated: "The Prophet ﷺ sacrificed two white rams with horns. He slaughtered them with his own hand, mentioned the name of Allah (Tasmiyah), and said the Takbir" [Reported by Bukhari & Muslim].
3. Evidence from Scholarly Consensus (Ijma')
The Muslims have reached a unanimous consensus on the Sharia basis of the Udhiyah, and no one among the scholars has disagreed with this. [Al-Sherbini, Mughni al-Muhtaj, Vol.6/P.122].And Allah the Exalted knows best.

What is the ruling on discharges two or three days before the expected period of menstruation and the light-colored blood accompanying it? Must the woman abstain from prayer during this period?

If the total duration of these blood-tinged discharges reaches a day and a night (24 hours) or more, it is considered menstruation. If their total does not exceed 24 hours, it is not considered menstruation but is irregular bleeding (dam al-fasad). Each woman has specific cases for which she should ask the scholars. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More