Articles

Hujjat al-Islam al-Ghazali: Spiritual Refinement through Examples from the Jurisprudence of Financial Dealings
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 29-03-2026

Hujjat al-Islam al-Ghazali:

Spiritual Refinement through Examples from the Jurisprudence of Financial Dealings

 

Praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds. May His peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

When Imam Taj al-Din ‘Abd al-Wahhab al-Subki (d. 771 AH), may Allah have mercy on him, wrote the biography of Imam al-Ghazali (d. 505 AH), he said: “Hujjat al-Islam, the clear path of the religion through which one reaches the Abode of Peace, the gatherer of the scattered branches of knowledge, excelling in both transmitted and understood sciences. He was the most knowledgeable among his peers, the imam of the people of his time, and the foremost in his field. His stature was testified to by both those who agreed with him and those who opposed him, and even his adversaries acknowledged his rank.”

[See: al-Subki, Taj al-Din ‘Abd al-Wahhab, Tabaqat al-Shafi‘iyyah al-Kubra, ed. Dr. Muhammad al-Tanahi and Dr. ‘Abd al-Fattah al-Hilu, Dar al-Hijrah for Printing, Publishing and Distribution, 2nd ed., 1413 AH, 6/191–194.]

When Imam al-Dhahabi wrote about al-Ghazali, may Allah have mercy on them both, he said: “The great shaykh, the imam, the ocean of knowledge, Hujjat al-Islam, the wonder of his time, (author of many works) and of extraordinary intelligence.”

[See: al-Dhahabi, Shams al-Din Abu ‘Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad (d. 748 AH), Siyar A‘lam al-Nubala’, Dar al-Hadith, Cairo, 1427 AH, 14/267.]

Imam al-Ghazali attained this lofty status in knowledge, jurisprudence, spiritual purification, and piety. Thus, it is no surprise that in his book Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din—a work on spiritual refinement and Sufism—you find insights into financial dealings, and a remarkable connection between purification of the soul and the foundations of monetary theory and wealth, which is a branch of economics. He moves from speaking about the love of Allah to discussing the prohibition of hoarding, from reflecting on gratitude to explaining the cause of riba.

Hujjat al-Islam, may Allah have mercy on him, speaks about the meaning of gratitude in the Book of Patience and Gratitude from the section on the means of salvation in Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din. He defines gratitude as:

“Using the blessings of Allah in what He loves; and ingratitude is its opposite—either by abandoning their use or by using them in what He dislikes.”

[See: al-Ghazali, Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Muhammad (d. 505 AH), Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, Dar al-Ma‘rifah, Beirut, 4/90.]

He then explains that attaining gratitude requires knowing what Allah loves and what He dislikes. This knowledge is based on understanding all the rulings of the noble Shariah concerning human actions, as well as perceiving the wisdom behind everything that exists. For Allah did not create anything without wisdom, and beneath that wisdom lies a purpose—and that purpose is what is beloved. These wisdoms are of two types: apparent and hidden.

Reaching Allah—who is the ultimate purpose of creation—can only be achieved through loving Him. Love for Him is established through constant remembrance and reflection, which in turn requires the preservation of the body. The body cannot survive except through nourishment, and nourishment depends on earth, water, and air. The body is thus the mount of the soul, which Allah created for the purpose of knowing Him.

After this journey through the secrets of knowing Allah and the paths leading to Him, Imam al-Ghazali transitions to an example of hidden wisdom that leads to true gratitude and avoidance of ingratitude. He says: “Among the blessings of Allah is the creation of dinars and dirhams. Through them the world is maintained. They are merely stones with no inherent benefit, yet people are compelled to use them because each person needs various goods—food, clothing, and other necessities… These diverse and scattered goods require a mediator to judge between them with fairness, so that each item’s rank and value may be known. Thus, Allah created dinars and dirhams as judges and intermediaries between all forms of wealth, by which wealth is measured.”

[Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/91.]

Through this, Imam al-Ghazali clarifies the importance of gold and silver (dinars and dirhams) and their purpose. They serve as the standard and intermediary between wealth, through which values are determined. They are not intended as commodities in themselves. Whoever uses them contrary to their intended purpose commits injustice and ingratitude, failing to realize true gratitude. Accordingly, the Shariah detailed rulings regarding them:

First: It prohibited riba (usury) in both excess and deferment. Exchanging gold for gold or silver for silver is only permissible hand to hand and equal for equal. Any increase turns money into an object of hoarding, which is injustice. Deferred exchange is also prohibited because it removes the element of goodwill found in lending and turns it into a transaction devoid of reward. As for exchanging gold for silver, it is permitted due to the difference in their functions.

[See: Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/91–92.]

Second: The Shariah prohibited hoarding gold and silver, because doing so removes them from their intended function. Wealth was not created for specific individuals, but to circulate among people as a fair standard. Allah says {what means}: “And those who hoard gold and silver and do not spend it in the way of Allah—give them tidings of a painful punishment.” (al-Tawbah/34)

Third: The Shariah prohibited using gold and silver as utensils, because this also removes them from their true function and turns them into tradable luxury goods.

Fourth: The Shariah prohibited hoarding food, because it is essential for life. Its purpose is nourishment and healing, and hoarding it restricts its availability and delays its intended use.

At the end of this discussion, Hujjat al-Islam briefly addresses the legal reasoning behind the prohibition of riba in food items. He says:

“Through this, the strength of al-Shafi‘i’s view becomes clear in restricting it to food items rather than all measurable goods…”

[Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/93.]

He also summarized the wisdom behind the prohibition of riba with the concise statement: “The Shariah has removed the pursuit of indulgence in what is essential for sustenance; this is the wisdom behind the prohibition of riba.”

[Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/93.]

That which sustains life (qiwam) includes gold and silver due to their monetary function, and also includes food, as indicated in the hadith, based on the characteristic of edibility according to the Shafi‘i school.

[See: al-Nawawi, al-Majmu‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab, 9/146.]

And Allah the Most High knows best.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

The Jurisprudential Significance of the Ḥadīth: "Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr Prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking..."
"Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking: 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah, lahu al-mulku wa lahu al-ḥamdu yuḥyī wa yumītu wa huwa ʿalā kulli shayʾin qadīr' ten times — ten good deeds will be recorded for him, ten bad deeds will be erased from him, he will be raised ten levels, he will spend that day in protection from everything disliked and guarded from the devil, and no sin will be able to befall him on that day except associating partners with Allah" — does this noble ḥadīth apply to the imam, and what is meant by "extraneous speech"?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite, immediately after the final salām, the specific remembrance reported in the sunnah to be said before turning away from one's place of prayer. The imam then leaves his praying spot, and the act of "turning" is fulfilled when the imam faces the congregation — even without physically leaving his spot — by positioning his right side toward them and his left side toward the qiblah, and this applies even while he is engaged in supplication.
Al-ʿAllāmah Ibn Qāsim al-ʿAbbādī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Tuḥfah (Vol.2/P.105): "It is most virtuous for the imam, once he has given the salām, to rise from his place of prayer immediately afterward." He adds that an exception must be made for the remembrances that are specifically required to be recited before he turns away. He then notes, citing Sharḥ al-ʿUbāb: "Yes, an exception to this rising immediately after the salām applies to the Fajr prayer, due to the authentic report that the Prophet ﷺ, when he prayed Fajr, would remain seated until the sun rose." He further cites, from al-Khādim, the ḥadīth concerning one who recites, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer while still in the position of crossing his leg to rise: "Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah..." and the rest of the well-known ḥadīth. He comments that this makes explicit that this particular remembrance is to be recited before the worshipper turns his legs to leave, and the same applies to Maghrib and ʿAṣr, as reported in those contexts as well.
What is meant by "speech" in the relevant ḥadīth is extraneous worldly speech that is not called for after the prayer and for which there is no legitimate excuse. The remembrances reported to be recited upon concluding the prayer, however, do not fall under this category of extraneous speech, since they are themselves required by the sharīʿah.
Al-ʿAllāmah ʿAlī al-Shabrāmalsī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Nihāyah (Vol.1/P.551): "If someone greets a person with salām while he is occupied with reciting this remembrance [i.e., 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh...'], should he return the greeting — without this causing him to forfeit the promised reward, since he is engaged in an obligatory matter — or should he delay returning the greeting until he finishes, this being a legitimate excuse for the delay?" He continues: "I say: the more likely view is the former, and the prohibition on speech is to be understood as applying to extraneous speech for which there is no legitimate excuse. Based on this, should the worshipper give precedence to this remembrance ('Lā ilāha illā Allāh...') or to reciting Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ ('Qul huwa Allāhu aḥad')? This requires consideration, though it is not unlikely that the remembrance takes precedence, given that the Lawgiver urged hastening to it through his words 'while crossing his leg.' This is not considered ordinary speech, since it is not extraneous to what is required after the prayer."
Accordingly, it is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite this remembrance and to give it precedence over the other remembrances of the prayer, ensuring it is said before they move from their place. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the amount of the Fitr Zakah (obligatory charity) of Ramadan?

The Fitr Zakah of Ramadhaan is a Sa` (2500 grams) from what the people of that country or state eat the most. And Allah Knows Best.

What is the ruling on someone who fainted while fasting?

● If a person had the intention to fast from the night but then fainted during the day and regained consciousness before sunset, even for a moment, their fast remains valid.
● However, if they remain unconscious for the entire day, from Fajr until sunset, their fast does not count, and they must make up for that day later.

Is it obligatory for someone traveling by plane in the afternoon during Ramadan to fast?

Anyone who intends to travel after dawn must begin the day fasting and continue with the intention of completing their fast, as fasting was obligatory upon them before traveling.
However, if they experience unbearable hardship after starting their journey, they are permitted to break their fast due to that hardship, not merely because of travel. In such a case, they must make up for the missed fast later.