Articles

The Minimum Period for the Iddah of Menstruating Women
Author : Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh
Date Added : 11-01-2026

The Minimum Period for the Iddah of Menstruating Women

 

All praise is to Allah, the Lord of the worlds, and prayers and peace be upon our Master Muhammad, his family, and all his companions:

The 'Iddah (waiting period) is a term prescribed by the Shariah for the cessation of the remaining effects of marriage or consummation.

See: Fath al-Qadeer (Vol.4/P.135), Badā'i' al-Sanā'i' (Vol.3/P.190).

The scholars are unanimously agreed that the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband after consummation or a valid private meeting (khulwah) due to a reason for separation other than death is three periods (qurū'), provided she is a menstruating woman (dhāt al-hayd), is not pregnant, and has not reached the age of menopause. The evidence for this is the statement of Allah, the Exalted: "Divorced women remain in waiting for three periods" [Surah Al-Baqarah/228].

The term qur' (period) is one of the words with multiple meanings in the Arabic language. It is applied equally to both menstruation (hayd) and purity (ṭuhr). Consequently, the scholars differed regarding the meaning of qur' mentioned in the noble verse, leading to two opinions:

The First Opinion: The Hanafis and Hanbalis hold that qur' means menstruation. Accordingly, a divorced woman's 'Iddah concludes after three menstrual cycles.

The Second Opinion: The Shafi'is and Malikis hold that qur' means purity. Accordingly, the 'Iddah of a divorced, non-pregnant, menstruating woman concludes after three periods of purity. Each opinion has its evidence, which is detailed in books of Fiqh, leaving no room to mention them here. None of the scholars of the four schools of thought said that the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband by divorce or annulment is counted in days or months. Counting it as such contradicts the explicit text of the Noble Quran and the consensus of the Ummah.

If a fatwa contradicts an explicit text of the Quran or a consensus, it is invalidated, as is the ruling of a judge. The Jordanian Personal Status Law stipulates that the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband concludes upon the passing of three qurū', provided she is not pregnant or menopausal. Article (135) of the aforementioned law states:

"The 'Iddah period for a woman married under a valid contract and separated from her husband after a valid private meeting by divorce or annulment is three complete periods (qurū'), if she is not pregnant and has not reached the age of menopause. If she claims the completion of her 'Iddah before the passage of three months, her claim is not accepted."

Since matters not addressed by a text in this law are referred to the preponderant opinion (rājih) in the school of Imam Abu Hanifah, as stipulated in Article (183) of the same law, the intended meaning of qur' in the law is menstruation, as stated by the Hanafi school.

Therefore: The 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband, if she is not pregnant or menopausal, is three menstruations. The menstruation during which she was divorced is not counted.

The Scholars' Opinions on the Minimum Period for the Completion of 'Iddah:

Since the duration of menstruation and purity is not fixed for women and varies from one woman to another, the scholars have stipulated the minimum duration for menstruation and purity, and consequently, the minimum period in which the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband can conclude.

Abu Hanifah stated that the minimum period in which a woman's claim of completing her 'Iddah is believed is sixty days. Abu Yusuf and Muhammad (al-Shaybani) said: She is believed after thirty-nine days.

The reasoning for their opinion is that it is as if she was divorced at the very last moment of her period of purity. Her menstruation is at its minimum: three days. Her purity is at its minimum: fifteen days. Three menstruations (3 x 3) equal nine days. Two periods of purity (2 x 15) equal thirty days. Thus, she is believed after thirty-nine days.

According to the explanation of Abu Hanifah's opinion as mentioned by Muhammad (al-Shaybani), may Allah have mercy on him, it is as if she was divorced at the beginning of her period of purity, as a precaution against pronouncing divorce during purity after intercourse. Her purity is fifteen days (as the minimum). Her menstruation is five days (as a moderate estimate, neither the rare minimum nor the maximum). Therefore, three periods of purity (3 x 15) equal forty-five days, and three menstruations (3 x 5) equal fifteen days, totaling sixty days.

According to the narration from Al-Hasan (may Allah have mercy on him), it is as if she was divorced at the end of her period of purity, as taking precaution against prolonging the 'Iddah is obligatory, and pronouncing divorce at the end of purity is closest to taking precaution against prolongation. Then her menstruation is ten days (the maximum), for when we estimated her purity at the minimum duration out of consideration for her, we estimate her menstruation at the maximum duration out of consideration for the husband. Therefore, three menstruations (3 x 10) equal thirty days, and two periods of purity (2 x 15) equal thirty days, totaling sixty days. He (Al-Hasan) said there is no meaning to the opinion of Abu Yusuf and Muhammad, as there is no possibility of believing her claim in that period (thirty-nine days).

See: Al-Mabsūṭ (Vol.3/P.217).

The Malikis held that the minimum period for the completion of a divorced woman's 'Iddah is forty-eight days.

The reasoning is: forty-five days for three periods of purity, and three days for three menstruations.

See: Al-Kharashi 'ala Khalil (Vol.4/P.136).

The Shafi'is stated that the minimum period for the completion of a divorced woman's 'Iddah is thirty-two days and two moments.

The detail is: She is divorced when only a moment remains of her period of purity. Then she menstruates for a day and a night, then becomes pure for fifteen days. Then she menstruates for a day and a night and becomes pure for fifteen days. Then she enters (her third) menstruation.

See: Al-Nawawi, Rawdat al-Tālibīn (Vol.3/P.179); Mughni al-Muhtāj (Vol.5/P.8).

The Hanbalis held that the minimum period in which a woman's 'Iddah can conclude is one month only.

This is based on their view that the minimum duration for menstruation is thirteen days.

Upon examining and scrutinizing the aforementioned opinions of the jurists, we find that the longest period mentioned by the scholars as the minimum in which the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband can conclude is sixty days, which is the opinion transmitted from Imam Abu Hanifah, may Allah have mercy on him.

Therefore: If a woman separated from her husband claims the completion of her 'Iddah after the passage of sixty days from her separation, her 'Iddah is considered concluded by the consensus of the jurists. Any fatwa to the contrary contradicts the consensus of the scholars and the explicit text of the Noble Quran.

Returning to the second part of Article (135), which states:

"If she claims the completion of her 'Iddah before three months, her claim is not accepted."

This may give judges and muftis the impression that if a woman claims the completion of her 'Iddah before three months, it is never accepted. We have previously clarified through the opinions of the scholars that no one held this view, and it contradicts the explicit text of the Noble Quran.

A decision was issued by the Amman Sharia Court of Appeal (No. 2044/2008, 71034 dated 15/8/2008 AH) clarifying that the text of the aforementioned article is taken from the opinions of some Maliki jurists. The well-known position in the Maliki school is that a woman is believed regarding the completion of her 'Iddah with an oath, provided the elapsed time makes it possible. However, the scholars of Fez, due to the prevalence of women lying about claiming the completion of 'Iddah, began not to accept a woman's claim of completing her 'Iddah in less than three months. They stated that while the opinion of not believing her is very lenient, if we see women in a city frequently lying, we impose upon them what was practiced in Fez, based on the opinion of Ibn Wahb. Otherwise, it would be necessary to follow the well-known opinion of believing them absolutely.

The meaning of the Maliki jurists' statement on this matter is to prevent her from marrying another man before three months have passed, due to the frequent false claims by women about completing 'Iddah. However, regarding returning (raj'ah) to the husband who divorced her, she is believed in any period in which it is possible for her 'Iddah to have ended. Therefore, acting upon this (the three-month restriction) does not entail a Shariah prohibition. The Shariah prohibition lies in returning her to her divorcing husband after her 'Iddah has actually ended, as this is a clear violation of the Quranic text.

The aforementioned decision, adopting the Hanafi school, concluded that if a woman claims the completion of her 'Iddah after sixty days have passed since her separation from her husband and before completing ninety days, she is believed upon taking an oath. The decision clarified that the article should be understood in this sense to avoid contradiction between the article's text and the Quranic text.

In reconciling the jurists' opinions on the minimum period for the completion of 'Iddah, the Jordanian Personal Status Law, and the text of the Amman Sharia Court of Appeal's decision, while considering the school of Imam Abu Hanifah, the position adopted for fatwa in this Department is as follows:

If a divorced woman claims the completion of her 'Iddah by having menstruated three times after the passage of sixty days from the date of her divorce, without her husband having taken her back (raj'ah), she is given a fatwa that her 'Iddah has ended. She is irrevocably separated from her husband—a minor or major irrevocability depending on the number of previous divorces. The fatwa issued to her will state that she must refer to the Sharia judge to establish this before him.

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

Is prayer nullified by nose bleed?

 All praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds.                                                                                                                                                                           Blood coming out of the nose, or a wound doesn`t nullify prayer regardless of its quantity. And Allah Knows Best.

Is it a condition for I‘tikaf to be performed in the mosque?

Yes, for I‘tikaf to be valid, it must be performed in a mosque. I‘tikaf is not valid if performed at home or elsewhere.

What is the ruling on the prayer of the individual following the imam whose prayer is broadcasted via television?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Among the conditions for the validity of following an Imam (Sihhat al-Iqtida’) is that the Imam and the follower (Ma’mum) must be in the same location. Therefore, the prayer of one who follows an Imam whose prayer is being broadcast via television from a distant location is not valid. However, if the follower is with the Imam in the same mosque, the prayer is valid. And Allah the Exalted knows best.