Articles

The Minimum Period for the Iddah of Menstruating Women
Author : Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh
Date Added : 11-01-2026

The Minimum Period for the Iddah of Menstruating Women

 

All praise is to Allah, the Lord of the worlds, and prayers and peace be upon our Master Muhammad, his family, and all his companions:

The 'Iddah (waiting period) is a term prescribed by the Shariah for the cessation of the remaining effects of marriage or consummation.

See: Fath al-Qadeer (Vol.4/P.135), Badā'i' al-Sanā'i' (Vol.3/P.190).

The scholars are unanimously agreed that the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband after consummation or a valid private meeting (khulwah) due to a reason for separation other than death is three periods (qurū'), provided she is a menstruating woman (dhāt al-hayd), is not pregnant, and has not reached the age of menopause. The evidence for this is the statement of Allah, the Exalted: "Divorced women remain in waiting for three periods" [Surah Al-Baqarah/228].

The term qur' (period) is one of the words with multiple meanings in the Arabic language. It is applied equally to both menstruation (hayd) and purity (ṭuhr). Consequently, the scholars differed regarding the meaning of qur' mentioned in the noble verse, leading to two opinions:

The First Opinion: The Hanafis and Hanbalis hold that qur' means menstruation. Accordingly, a divorced woman's 'Iddah concludes after three menstrual cycles.

The Second Opinion: The Shafi'is and Malikis hold that qur' means purity. Accordingly, the 'Iddah of a divorced, non-pregnant, menstruating woman concludes after three periods of purity. Each opinion has its evidence, which is detailed in books of Fiqh, leaving no room to mention them here. None of the scholars of the four schools of thought said that the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband by divorce or annulment is counted in days or months. Counting it as such contradicts the explicit text of the Noble Quran and the consensus of the Ummah.

If a fatwa contradicts an explicit text of the Quran or a consensus, it is invalidated, as is the ruling of a judge. The Jordanian Personal Status Law stipulates that the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband concludes upon the passing of three qurū', provided she is not pregnant or menopausal. Article (135) of the aforementioned law states:

"The 'Iddah period for a woman married under a valid contract and separated from her husband after a valid private meeting by divorce or annulment is three complete periods (qurū'), if she is not pregnant and has not reached the age of menopause. If she claims the completion of her 'Iddah before the passage of three months, her claim is not accepted."

Since matters not addressed by a text in this law are referred to the preponderant opinion (rājih) in the school of Imam Abu Hanifah, as stipulated in Article (183) of the same law, the intended meaning of qur' in the law is menstruation, as stated by the Hanafi school.

Therefore: The 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband, if she is not pregnant or menopausal, is three menstruations. The menstruation during which she was divorced is not counted.

The Scholars' Opinions on the Minimum Period for the Completion of 'Iddah:

Since the duration of menstruation and purity is not fixed for women and varies from one woman to another, the scholars have stipulated the minimum duration for menstruation and purity, and consequently, the minimum period in which the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband can conclude.

Abu Hanifah stated that the minimum period in which a woman's claim of completing her 'Iddah is believed is sixty days. Abu Yusuf and Muhammad (al-Shaybani) said: She is believed after thirty-nine days.

The reasoning for their opinion is that it is as if she was divorced at the very last moment of her period of purity. Her menstruation is at its minimum: three days. Her purity is at its minimum: fifteen days. Three menstruations (3 x 3) equal nine days. Two periods of purity (2 x 15) equal thirty days. Thus, she is believed after thirty-nine days.

According to the explanation of Abu Hanifah's opinion as mentioned by Muhammad (al-Shaybani), may Allah have mercy on him, it is as if she was divorced at the beginning of her period of purity, as a precaution against pronouncing divorce during purity after intercourse. Her purity is fifteen days (as the minimum). Her menstruation is five days (as a moderate estimate, neither the rare minimum nor the maximum). Therefore, three periods of purity (3 x 15) equal forty-five days, and three menstruations (3 x 5) equal fifteen days, totaling sixty days.

According to the narration from Al-Hasan (may Allah have mercy on him), it is as if she was divorced at the end of her period of purity, as taking precaution against prolonging the 'Iddah is obligatory, and pronouncing divorce at the end of purity is closest to taking precaution against prolongation. Then her menstruation is ten days (the maximum), for when we estimated her purity at the minimum duration out of consideration for her, we estimate her menstruation at the maximum duration out of consideration for the husband. Therefore, three menstruations (3 x 10) equal thirty days, and two periods of purity (2 x 15) equal thirty days, totaling sixty days. He (Al-Hasan) said there is no meaning to the opinion of Abu Yusuf and Muhammad, as there is no possibility of believing her claim in that period (thirty-nine days).

See: Al-Mabsūṭ (Vol.3/P.217).

The Malikis held that the minimum period for the completion of a divorced woman's 'Iddah is forty-eight days.

The reasoning is: forty-five days for three periods of purity, and three days for three menstruations.

See: Al-Kharashi 'ala Khalil (Vol.4/P.136).

The Shafi'is stated that the minimum period for the completion of a divorced woman's 'Iddah is thirty-two days and two moments.

The detail is: She is divorced when only a moment remains of her period of purity. Then she menstruates for a day and a night, then becomes pure for fifteen days. Then she menstruates for a day and a night and becomes pure for fifteen days. Then she enters (her third) menstruation.

See: Al-Nawawi, Rawdat al-Tālibīn (Vol.3/P.179); Mughni al-Muhtāj (Vol.5/P.8).

The Hanbalis held that the minimum period in which a woman's 'Iddah can conclude is one month only.

This is based on their view that the minimum duration for menstruation is thirteen days.

Upon examining and scrutinizing the aforementioned opinions of the jurists, we find that the longest period mentioned by the scholars as the minimum in which the 'Iddah of a woman separated from her husband can conclude is sixty days, which is the opinion transmitted from Imam Abu Hanifah, may Allah have mercy on him.

Therefore: If a woman separated from her husband claims the completion of her 'Iddah after the passage of sixty days from her separation, her 'Iddah is considered concluded by the consensus of the jurists. Any fatwa to the contrary contradicts the consensus of the scholars and the explicit text of the Noble Quran.

Returning to the second part of Article (135), which states:

"If she claims the completion of her 'Iddah before three months, her claim is not accepted."

This may give judges and muftis the impression that if a woman claims the completion of her 'Iddah before three months, it is never accepted. We have previously clarified through the opinions of the scholars that no one held this view, and it contradicts the explicit text of the Noble Quran.

A decision was issued by the Amman Sharia Court of Appeal (No. 2044/2008, 71034 dated 15/8/2008 AH) clarifying that the text of the aforementioned article is taken from the opinions of some Maliki jurists. The well-known position in the Maliki school is that a woman is believed regarding the completion of her 'Iddah with an oath, provided the elapsed time makes it possible. However, the scholars of Fez, due to the prevalence of women lying about claiming the completion of 'Iddah, began not to accept a woman's claim of completing her 'Iddah in less than three months. They stated that while the opinion of not believing her is very lenient, if we see women in a city frequently lying, we impose upon them what was practiced in Fez, based on the opinion of Ibn Wahb. Otherwise, it would be necessary to follow the well-known opinion of believing them absolutely.

The meaning of the Maliki jurists' statement on this matter is to prevent her from marrying another man before three months have passed, due to the frequent false claims by women about completing 'Iddah. However, regarding returning (raj'ah) to the husband who divorced her, she is believed in any period in which it is possible for her 'Iddah to have ended. Therefore, acting upon this (the three-month restriction) does not entail a Shariah prohibition. The Shariah prohibition lies in returning her to her divorcing husband after her 'Iddah has actually ended, as this is a clear violation of the Quranic text.

The aforementioned decision, adopting the Hanafi school, concluded that if a woman claims the completion of her 'Iddah after sixty days have passed since her separation from her husband and before completing ninety days, she is believed upon taking an oath. The decision clarified that the article should be understood in this sense to avoid contradiction between the article's text and the Quranic text.

In reconciling the jurists' opinions on the minimum period for the completion of 'Iddah, the Jordanian Personal Status Law, and the text of the Amman Sharia Court of Appeal's decision, while considering the school of Imam Abu Hanifah, the position adopted for fatwa in this Department is as follows:

If a divorced woman claims the completion of her 'Iddah by having menstruated three times after the passage of sixty days from the date of her divorce, without her husband having taken her back (raj'ah), she is given a fatwa that her 'Iddah has ended. She is irrevocably separated from her husband—a minor or major irrevocability depending on the number of previous divorces. The fatwa issued to her will state that she must refer to the Sharia judge to establish this before him.

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

Is it permissible for the children of a deceased father to settle his debt from the Zakah (obligatory charity) money due on them?

It is impermissible to use the Zakah of one`s money for settling the debts of the deceased. However, children should settle the debts of their deceased parents out of filial piety. And Allah Knows Best.

Do ear and nose drops break the fast?

 
Yes, ear and nose drops break the fast because both the nose and ears are open passages to the body cavity.

Does swallowing a fly, road dust, or flour dust break the fast?

A fasting person does not break their fast if something enters their body cavity against their will, such as a fly, road dust, or flour dust.

The Jurisprudential Significance of the Ḥadīth: "Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr Prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking..."
"Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking: 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah, lahu al-mulku wa lahu al-ḥamdu yuḥyī wa yumītu wa huwa ʿalā kulli shayʾin qadīr' ten times — ten good deeds will be recorded for him, ten bad deeds will be erased from him, he will be raised ten levels, he will spend that day in protection from everything disliked and guarded from the devil, and no sin will be able to befall him on that day except associating partners with Allah" — does this noble ḥadīth apply to the imam, and what is meant by "extraneous speech"?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite, immediately after the final salām, the specific remembrance reported in the sunnah to be said before turning away from one's place of prayer. The imam then leaves his praying spot, and the act of "turning" is fulfilled when the imam faces the congregation — even without physically leaving his spot — by positioning his right side toward them and his left side toward the qiblah, and this applies even while he is engaged in supplication.
Al-ʿAllāmah Ibn Qāsim al-ʿAbbādī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Tuḥfah (Vol.2/P.105): "It is most virtuous for the imam, once he has given the salām, to rise from his place of prayer immediately afterward." He adds that an exception must be made for the remembrances that are specifically required to be recited before he turns away. He then notes, citing Sharḥ al-ʿUbāb: "Yes, an exception to this rising immediately after the salām applies to the Fajr prayer, due to the authentic report that the Prophet ﷺ, when he prayed Fajr, would remain seated until the sun rose." He further cites, from al-Khādim, the ḥadīth concerning one who recites, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer while still in the position of crossing his leg to rise: "Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah..." and the rest of the well-known ḥadīth. He comments that this makes explicit that this particular remembrance is to be recited before the worshipper turns his legs to leave, and the same applies to Maghrib and ʿAṣr, as reported in those contexts as well.
What is meant by "speech" in the relevant ḥadīth is extraneous worldly speech that is not called for after the prayer and for which there is no legitimate excuse. The remembrances reported to be recited upon concluding the prayer, however, do not fall under this category of extraneous speech, since they are themselves required by the sharīʿah.
Al-ʿAllāmah ʿAlī al-Shabrāmalsī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Nihāyah (Vol.1/P.551): "If someone greets a person with salām while he is occupied with reciting this remembrance [i.e., 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh...'], should he return the greeting — without this causing him to forfeit the promised reward, since he is engaged in an obligatory matter — or should he delay returning the greeting until he finishes, this being a legitimate excuse for the delay?" He continues: "I say: the more likely view is the former, and the prohibition on speech is to be understood as applying to extraneous speech for which there is no legitimate excuse. Based on this, should the worshipper give precedence to this remembrance ('Lā ilāha illā Allāh...') or to reciting Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ ('Qul huwa Allāhu aḥad')? This requires consideration, though it is not unlikely that the remembrance takes precedence, given that the Lawgiver urged hastening to it through his words 'while crossing his leg.' This is not considered ordinary speech, since it is not extraneous to what is required after the prayer."
Accordingly, it is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite this remembrance and to give it precedence over the other remembrances of the prayer, ensuring it is said before they move from their place. And Allah the Almighty knows best.