Articles

The Rulings of Islamic Law on a Woman's Voice according to the Shafi'i Fiqh
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 12-10-2025

The Rulings of Islamic Law on a Woman's Voice according to the Shafi'i Fiqh

 

Is a woman's voice considered 'awrah?

A woman's voice is not considered 'awrah according to the most correct opinion. Therefore, a woman's prayer is not invalidated if she recites aloud, and it is permissible to listen to her voice provided there is no fear of temptation (fitnah) or that the listener does not derive pleasure from it. If temptation is feared, or if the listener derives pleasure from it—even without fearing temptation—then it is forbidden to listen attentively to her voice, even if it is for reciting the Qur'an. Consequently, in all the discussions that follow, which permit a non-mahram man (A man who isn`t a permanent, unmarriageable relative) to hear a woman's voice, it becomes forbidden to listen for any of those reasons if it is accompanied by desire or fear of temptation.

What is meant by the statement "fear of temptation" (khawf al-fitnah)?

The meaning of "fear of temptation" is anything that could be an impetus for sexual intercourse or seclusion (khalwah), meaning that if the man were to seclude himself with the woman, it is feared that something forbidden would occur between them.

What is the ruling on a woman giving the call to prayer (adhan)?

Jurists have stated that one of the conditions for the validity of the adhan is that the caller (mu'adhin) be male. It is therefore a function specific to males.

Consequently, it is absolutely forbidden for a woman to raise her voice in giving the adhan, and she does not receive a reward for it. This is because the adhan is not required of her according to Islamic Law, and because it involves imitating men (tashabbuh bi al-rijal)—even if she does not intend to imitate them, the imitation is present because the adhan is specifically for males. Furthermore, since it involves raising the voice, there is a fear of temptation. Allowing her to do so would impose upon people a cause of temptation, because it is recommended (sunnah) to listen to the mu'adhin and to look at him, and both of these actions directed towards her could lead to temptation. If a woman were permitted to give the adhan, it would lead to a non-mahram man being commanded to listen and look at what is feared may cause temptation, and this is impermissible.

If a woman gives the adhan without raising her voice, but she intends to imitate men, then her adhan is forbidden.

Thus, for the prohibition to apply, one of two reasons must be present: either raising the voice, or the intention to imitate men. Imam Al-Bujayrimi gave preponderance to the opinion that the relied-upon reason is the intention to imitate men.

If a woman gives the adhan for men, her adhan is not valid and is not considered, because her leading men in prayer is not valid, so her giving the adhan for them is also not valid. In this case, she is sinful. According to the relied-upon opinion, there is no distinction between male mahrams and non-mahrams in this ruling.

It is not obligatory for a man who hears a woman's adhan to block his ears, because hearing her voice is only forbidden when there is a fear of temptation.

Since the adhan is forbidden for her, does she receive a reward for it or not? Some scholars gave preponderance to the view that she does receive a reward, by analogy with performing prayer in usurped property; because punishment can occur without deprivation of reward. However, Imam Al-Shabramallisi gave preponderance to the view that she does not receive a reward, stating that this is the closer opinion, because, according to Sharia, prayer is required from her and she is punished for abandoning it, so she is rewarded for performing it even in usurped property. This is unlike the adhan, which she is prohibited from performing, so she is not rewarded for it.

If a woman gives the adhan for other women, only to the extent that they can hear her, without raising her voice, without intending the formal adhan, without intending it as an act of worship in its capacity as an adhan, and she intends it merely as a remembrance of Allah Almighty, then it is not forbidden nor is it disliked according to that opinion. It would be permissible but not recommended, because the adhan is not recommended for women even if men are absent. It is considered a remembrance of Allah Almighty and has the form of an adhan, but it is not a valid adhan according to Islamic Law. If any of these restrictions is not met, her adhan is forbidden, even if no non-mahram men are present.

The ruling on a woman performing the iqamah (the second call to prayer, immediately preceding the prayer):

Performing the iqamah is recommended for a congregation of women, meaning that one of them may perform it. This is because the purpose of the iqamah is primarily to alert those present, so there is no raising of the voice in it that would necessitate caution. It is also recommended for a woman praying alone to perform the iqamah for herself.

It is not valid for a woman to perform the iqamah for a man. The question of whether she sins by doing so, due to engaging in an invalid act of worship—by analogy to giving the adhan before its proper time—is one possibility. However, Imam Al-Shabramallisi considered the closer opinion to be the opposite, and Imam Al-Shirwani followed him in this.

The ruling on a woman raising her voice with the Qur'an in prayer and outside of it:

It is permissible for a woman to raise her voice in reciting the Noble Qur'an, both in prayer and outside of it, even though listening attentively to the recitation is recommended. However, it is disliked for her to recite aloud in prayer in the presence of a non-mahram man, due to the fear of temptation.

Imam Al-Shirbini disagreed with the previous ruling, reasoning that her recitation should be treated like the adhan, because it is recommended to listen to the Qur'an, thus making it analogous to the adhan.

The distinction between Qur'an recitation and the adhan is that recitation is fundamentally legislated for women. The dislike arises only due to an incidental factor, which is the fear of temptation. This is unlike the adhan, which is not legislated for women because it is a function specific to males. Furthermore, it is not recommended to look at the reciter, unlike the case of the mu'adhin. Therefore, the analogy of Qur'an recitation to the adhan is not sound. In any case, it is forbidden for a non-mahram man to listen to her recitation if it is accompanied by desire or fear of temptation.

Raising the voice with the Talbiyah during Hajj:

It is recommended for a man to raise his voice with the Talbiyah, to the extent that it does not harm him. It is recommended for a woman to lower her voice with the Talbiyah, to the extent that she can hear herself. This is because there is a fear of temptation arising from her voice; a woman's voice may be a cause of temptation for the listener, and sometimes her voice can be more tempting than looking at her.

If she raises her voice with the Talbiyah, her ruling is the same as the ruling for one who raises her voice with Qur'an recitation in prayer: it is disliked for her to raise her voice with the Talbiyah in the presence of non-mahram men, but it is not forbidden—even if she raises her voice beyond what her female companions can hear—because her voice is not 'awrah, it is not recommended to listen attentively to her during her Talbiyah, and everyone is occupied with their own Talbiyah and not listening to the Talbiyah of others.

If the woman is alone, or in the presence of women, her husband, or her mahrams, then she may recite the Talbiyah aloud without any dislike, just as she may recite the Qur'an aloud in her audible prayers when no non-mahram man is present.

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on compensating the patient in case of medical error on the part of the treating physician?

 
All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The foundational principle is that every mistake issued by a physician that causes harm to another due to his negligence or lack of expertise obligates him to guarantee liability and compensate the harmed party. The Sharia maxim, in this regard, states: "The direct actor is liable."
 
Ibn Qudamah (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "As for if he was skilled but his hand committed an error—such as exceeding the proper limit of incision, cutting in an incorrect site, cutting with an instrument that inflicts excessive pain, or cutting at an unsuitable time—he is liable, because it is destruction (Itlaf) whose liability does not differ between intent and mistake, thus resembling the destruction of property; and because it is a prohibited act, so he guarantees liability for its secondary effects." [Al-Mughni].
 
However, if the physician performed what was necessary in the most complete manner and took all measures of care and caution, but complications occurred that could not be avoided according to specialists, then no liability rests upon him.
 
Shaykh al-Islam Imam al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "The cupper and the circumciser bear no liability if they have not been negligent, and likewise the veterinarian if he bleeds an animal and it perishes." [Rawdat al-Talibin].
 
Al-Khattabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "I know of no disagreement that if the practitioner transgresses and the patient perishes, he is liable. Anyone who undertakes knowledge or practice he does not know is a transgressor; so if perishing arises from his action, he is liable for the blood-money (Diyah) while capital retaliation (Qisas) is dropped from him, because he did not act independently without the patient's permission. And the physician’s offense in the view of the generality of jurists is borne by his agnates ('Aqilah*)."* [Ma'alim al-Sunan].
 
If negligence or transgression is established against the physician, it is necessary to compensate the patient or seek forgiveness from him. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling if hemorrhoid blood exits after completing ablution?

If this blood is exiting from outside the anus (due to the hemorrhoid protruding), it does not invalidate ablution, because blood exiting from the body from other than the two orifices does not invalidate ablution. If it exits from the anus (meaning from inside it), it invalidates ablution, and one must perform istinja' from it, wash the area of impurity, and repeat the ablution.
However, if this blood exits continuously such that no time remains sufficient for purification and prayer without it flowing, then it takes the ruling of urinary incontinence (sals al-bawl). One then cleanses from it after the time for each prayer enters, performs ablution immediately thereafter, and performs the obligatory prayer immediately. There is no liability upon him after that if something of it flows, and he may pray as many voluntary prayers as he wishes. If he wants to pray another obligatory prayer, he must cleanse himself and perform ablution. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on someone who combines two prayers as an early combination (jam‘ taqdīm), and then arrives at his place of residence during the time of the second prayer — is he obligated to repeat it?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Whoever combines Ẓuhr and ‘Aṣr while traveling — that is, before he has reached the built-up boundaries of his hometown [upon returning] — his combination (jam‘) of the two prayers remains valid, even if he arrives at his place of residence before the time for the second prayer has actually begun. This is because the combination was already validly completed with its proper conditions fulfilled, and he is not obligated to repeat the second prayer [upon arrival].
A traveler is permitted to make use of the concessions of shortening (qaṣr) and combining (jam‘) prayers once the distance of travel reaches (81 km) or more, provided that his journey is a permissible one, and that he begins shortening and combining only after actually setting out on the journey and passing beyond the built-up limits of the city in which he resides. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on obtaining financing from Islamic banks by bringing invoices in prior arrangement with the seller, then taking the cash after the financing is approved — with the purpose of settling debts and buying a car?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It appears from the transaction described that its underlying purpose is to obtain cash through resorting to a legal artifice (ḥīlah/tawarruq-style trick), and it is not permissible to engage in such trickery or to coordinate with the various parties merely to obtain liquidity. This is because such artifices bring the sale closer in reality to a ribā-based (usurious) transaction, even if it outwardly appears otherwise.
The Prophet ﷺ said: "Do not commit what the Jews committed, thereby making lawful what Allah has made unlawful through the flimsiest of tricks." This was related by Ibn Baṭṭah in his book Ibṭāl al-Ḥiyal (p. 47), and many scholars have graded it as ḥasan (sound/acceptable).
We have already explained the impermissibility of engaging in such deceptive dealings with Islamic banks in Fatwa No. 516, so please refer to it. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.