Articles

Some Etiquettes of the Mufti
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 17-11-2022

 

All perfect praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds. May Allah`s peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

A Mufti represents the Seal of the Messengers, Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), since he delivers the rulings of Sharia and extrapolates rulings about matters that have no evidence from the Quran and the Sunnah. Therefore, he has to have a number of essential etiquettes. In his book [E`lam Al-Moakkie`n] Ibn Al-Qayem referred to the most important of these etiquettes." Following are the most salient in question-answer form with examples:

 

First: When should the Mufti answer the questioner?

If the Mufti is asked about the ruling of Sharia on a certain matter/incident and the asker needed an immediate answer, then the Mufti should answer him/her immediately and he isn`t permitted not to point out the ruling.

Example:

 If it was announced that tomorrow is the first day of the holy month of Ramadan and a person asked the Mufti-before the second call for Fajir prayer-about the time of making the intention (Niyyah) of fasting, then the Mufti must explain that its time extends from the sunset of the day before until the emergence of the true dawn. However, if the Mufti didn`t make that clear to the asker then the fasting of the latter is unacceptable and he must make up for that missed day.

 

Second: When shouldn`t the Mufti answer the questioner?

There are four cases in which the Mufti shouldn`t answer the questioner:

1- If the Mufti is asked about the ruling of Sharia on a matter/incident that he has no knowledge about, then it is prohibited to give a Fatwa without knowledge. The evidence on this is that Almighty Allah Says (What means): "Say: the things that my Lord hath indeed forbidden are: shameful deeds, whether open or secret; sins and trespasses against truth or reason; assigning of partners to God, for which He hath given no authority; and saying things about God of which ye have no knowledge." [Al-A`raf/33]. Allah The Almighty Says (what means): "But say not - for any false thing that your tongues may put forth,- "This is lawful, and this is forbidden," so as to ascribe false things to God. For those who ascribe false things to God, will never prosper." [An-Nahil/116].

In this situation, the Mufti must say: "I don`t know" for this isn`t considered a drawback on his part because this absolves him from liability on the Day of Judgment.

In his book [Al-Risalah] Al-Shafie` stated: "It isn`t permissible to give Fatwa without the needed knowledge. Even if he gave the correct answer, this isn`t preferred in Sharia and he receives no reward for that."

Al-Ghazali said: "Happy is the one who dies and his evil deeds die along with him." 

The one who gives Fatwa without knowledge will bear its sin and the sin of those who act upon it until the Day of Resurrection.

2- If the Mufti is asked about a matter/incident that hasn`t taken place or there is no Sharia evidence concerning it, then he doesn`t have to give an answer.

Example:

If the Mufti was asked how should the one who was swallowed by a big fish and got out by some sort of miracle, cleanse/purify himself to perform acts of worship? This is a hypothetical question that a Mufti doesn`t have to answer. The righteous predecessors {May Allah have mercy on them} used to ask the one seeking Fatwa: "Did this incident take place?" If the answer was "No" then they wouldn`t give a Fatwa and advise him to ask about necessary matters of the religion.

The reason behind this is that giving Fatwa about matters on which there is no evidence in Sharia nor scholarly consensus depends on Ijtihad, which is allowed upon necessity, such as eating dead meat. However, if there is evidence on that matter then it isn`t discouraged to give Fatwa.

However, if there was no evidence from Sharia and the matter/incident wasn`t excluded and the asker wanted to know the ruling in the event that it took place, then the Mufti is encouraged to give a Fatwa because the asker may not find a Mufti to do that when the matter/incident actually takes place.

3- If the Fatwa will cause greater evil than abstaining from delivering it, and then the Mufti is required not to deliver it to ward off greater evil with lesser evil.

For example, the Prophet (PBUH) didn`t give a Fatwa to knock down the Kaba and rebuild it on the foundation of Ibrahim (PBUH) because the people of Quraish have recently embraced Islam. Therefore, had he given that Fatwa, they would have hated Islam and some of them would have committed apostasy as a result. It was narrated from Aisha that the Messenger of Allah said to her: "O Aishah, were if not for the fact that your people have recently left Jahiliyyah, I would have commanded that the House be knocked down, and I would have incorporated into it what was left out of it. I would have made its (door) in level with the ground and I would have given it two doors, an eastern door and a western door. For they built it too small, and by doing this, it would have been built on the foundation of Ibrahim, peace be upon him." {Related by Bukhari}.

Al-Shafie was once asked: "Why don`t you give a Fatwa on this matter/incident?!" He replied: "I need to make sure which is better, keeping silent or giving an answer."

Example: 

A man asked Ibn Abbas about the interpretation of a verse, then he answered him by saying: "What is the guarantee that telling you its interpretation won`t cause you to disbelieve in Allah."

 

Third: Is it permissible for the Mufti to refrain from answering the question and address a matter that is more beneficial to the asker?

Yes, it is permissible for the Mufti to do so since this indicates that he cares about the asker and wants to direct him to what is in his best interest. Of course, this is after answering the asker`s question.

Example:

If someone asked the Mufti: "Is it permissible to give the Zakah of my wealth to my poor daughter?" It is allowed for the Mufti to say: "Yes, it is." After that, the Mufti explains what is better and more beneficial by saying: "If you are wealthy, then consider paying her a salary. This will help her, her husband, and your grandchildren to live a decent life, win the reward of their prayers for you, and most importantly this is charity and maintaining of kinship ties."

The proof that such an approach is permissible lies in the following verse: "They ask thee what they should spend (In charity). Say: Whatever ye spend that is good is for parents and kindred and orphans and those in want and for wayfarers. And whatever ye do that is good, -God knoweth it well." [Al-Baqarah/ 215]. In this verse, the question is about what to spend, but the answer is the eligible recipients, because it is more important than what the question is about.

 

Fourth: Is it permissible for the Mufti to elaborate on the answer?

Yes, it is, and this indicates maturity and wisdom. 

Example:

Abu Hurairah said:

"A man asked the prophet (PBUH): 'O Messenger of Allah, we travel by sea and we take a little water with us, but if we use it for Wudu', we will go thirsty. Can we perform Wudu' with seawater?' The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said: 'Its water is a means of purification and its dead meat is permissible.'" {Tirmithi}.

The question is about the ruling on using the seawater for wudu`; however, the Prophet (PBUH) answered along with explaining the ruling on eating the dead meat of the sea indicating that the water remains pure, even if the fish is dead.

 

Fifth: Is it permissible for the Mufti to direct the asker to a permissible alternative, if what he asked about is prohibited?

Yes, it is. Rather, this is recommended because it indicates that the Mufti is well versed in Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and cares about what is in the best interest of the asker. 

Example:

The Prophet (PBUH) appointed a man over Khaibar and he brought him dates of a very fine quality. He asked him whether all the dates of Khaibar were like that, and he replied, “I swear by God that they are certainly not, Messenger of God. We take a Sa' of this kind for two, and two for three." So he said, "Do not do so. Sell the lot for dirhams, then buy the very fine dates for dirhams." He said that it was the same when things were sold by weight. [Agreed upon].

In this Hadith, the Messenger gave the asker the way out by selling the poor quality dates and using the money to buy good quality dates.

 

Sixth: Is it permissible for the Mufti to give Fatwa using direct evidence from the Quran and the Sunnah.

This is advisable and the Mufti should be keen on doing so as much as he can to achieve the following benefits:

1- Mentioning Allah and His Messenger

2- Clarifying the ruling of Sharia

3- Stating the evidence

4- Strengthening the asker`s confidence in the answer since the texts of Sharia are errorless.

Example:

If the Mufti was asked: "If my father divorced one of his wives (Who isn`t a mother of mine), is it allowed for me to marry her?

 

The answer is: "And marry not women whom your fathers married, - except what is past: It was shameful and odious, - an abominable custom indeed." (An-Nisa`/22).

In addition, it is better to explain the intended meaning of the text since the asker may not understand it.

 

Seventh: Is it permissible for the Mufti to receive a salary from the state?

It isn`t permissible to receive wages for giving Fatwa because Fatwa is all about delivering the rulings of Sharia, so it isn`t permissible to receive compensation for that. However, it is permissible for the Mufti to receive a salary from the state in return for freeing himself and dedicating his time to giving Fatwas to the people.

This salary isn`t in exchange for Fatwa since he answers questions within and after the official working hours, so the Fatwa isn`t given in return for money. Moreover, a Mufti may answer a hundred questions in a month and two hundred in another but the salary remains the same, which indicates that the salary isn`t taken in return for delivering Fatwas.

 

Finally, I remind people to be mindful of Allah. The above etiquettes are a drop in the ocean, so whoever wishes to learn more should consult the approved books in this field. And all success is due to Allah. 

 

 

 

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on praying seated due to severe obesity, given that I experience hardship in performing the prayer — especially when rising from the ground after sujūd to perform the next rak‘ah?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Standing, when one is able to do so, is a pillar of the prayer. However, whoever would experience severe, intolerable hardship, or fears harm to himself or to a limb due to obesity, or finds that standing causes him to lose his khushū‘ (humble focus and concentration) in prayer, then there is no objection to his praying seated on a chair or on the ground, performing rukū‘ (bowing) and sujūd (prostration) through gesture — provided that the gesture for sujūd is made lower than that for rukū‘. Whoever is able, at any point, to properly perform any one of these pillars, is obligated to perform it in full; for omitting it is a concession that applies only in cases of genuine inability. The Prophet ﷺ said: "When I command you to do something, do of it whatever you are able." (Related by al-Bukhārī). As the scholars of fiqh have established: what remains possible is not waived on account of what is difficult.
The criterion for determining genuine inability, as chosen by Imam al-Ḥaramayn al-Juwaynī (raḥimahullāh), is that the worshipper experiences hardship that causes him to lose his khushū‘.
As for voluntary (nafl) prayer, there is no objection to performing it while seated, even if one is able to stand. However, rukū‘ and sujūd must still be performed [in their proper physical form] by anyone who is able to do so. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on discharging one's zakāh obligation through the provision of a specific benefit (manfa‘ah) — such as performing a surgical operation for a patient, or providing housing to a tenant, and counting the value of this service as zakāh?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is obligatory to pay zakāh from the actual asset (‘ayn al-māl) upon which zakāh is due, except in the case of zakāh on trade goods ('urūḍ at-tijārah), which is paid based on their monetary value. In all cases, zakāh must be given in the form of tamlīk (a full transfer of ownership), based on the words of Allah, the Mighty and Majestic (which mean): "Zakāh expenditures are only for the poor and for the needy, and for those employed to collect [zakāh], and for bringing hearts together [for Islam], and for freeing captives [or slaves], and for those in debt, and for the cause of Allah, and for the [stranded] traveler — an obligation [imposed] by Allah. And Allah is Knowing and Wise" [at-Tawbah/60]. The letter "lām" (لِ) in this verse — as in "lil-fuqarā'" ("for the poor") — indicates possession/ownership (lām al-milk).
It is not permissible to fulfill one's zakāh obligation by providing a benefit or service (manfa‘ah) — such as housing, education, or medical treatment — in place of the zakāh itself. This is because zakāh must be paid as wealth (māl) that is transferred into the ownership of the poor recipient, whereas such services are intangible benefits that are not, in themselves, capable of being formally transferred in ownership (ghayr qābilah lit-tamlīk). And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the recommended supplication (Du'a) upon breaking the fast, and is it recited before or after breaking it?

 
All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is recommended (Mustahabb) for a fasting person to recite upon breaking the fast—that is, immediately after eating or drinking—the supplication: "Allahumma laka sumtu wa 'ala rizqika aftartu" (O Allah, for You I have fasted, and with Your provision I have broken my fast).
 
This is because our master, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), used to say this. The narration was recorded by Abu Dawud with a good (Hasan) chain of transmission, albeit in a Mursal form (a narration where a Successor reports directly from the Prophet). Shaykh al-Islam Imam Ibn Hajar al-Haytami (may Allah have mercy upon him) stated: "Its Mursal status is inconsequential, as it pertains to virtuous deeds (Fada'il); furthermore, it was connected (Mawsul) through another chain of transmission." [Tuhfat al-Muhtaj, Vol.3/P.425]
 
It is also recommended to recite: "Dhahaba al-dhama'u wa ibtallat al-'uruqu wa thabata al-ajru in sha' Allah" (The thirst has gone, the veins are moistened, and the reward is confirmed, if Allah wills).
 
This was recorded by Abu Dawud with a good (Hasan) chain. Our leading jurists (Imams) have explicitly stated that it is recommended for the fasting person to combine both supplications.
 
Imam al-Bajuri (may Allah have mercy upon him) stated:
 
 
"And his saying following his breaking of the fast—that is, it is recommended to say: 'O Allah, for You I have fasted, upon Your provision I have broken my fast, in You I have believed, to You I have submitted, and upon You I have relied. The thirst has gone, the veins are moistened, and the reward is confirmed, if Allah wills. O You of vast bounty, forgive me. Praise be to Allah Who aided me so that I fasted, and provided for me so that I broke my fast. O Allah, grant us success in fasting, enable us to stand in night prayer during it, and aid us in it while people sleep, and admit us to Paradise in peace.'" [Hashiyat al-Bajuri, Vol.1/P.562]
 
Furthermore, the fasting person may supplicate with whatever good he or she wishes, for the supplication of a fasting person is answered. Al-Bayhaqi recorded on the authority of Anas ibn Malik that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Three supplications are not rejected: the supplication of a parent for his child, the supplication of a fasting person, and the supplication of a traveler." And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on compensating the patient in case of medical error on the part of the treating physician?

 
All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The foundational principle is that every mistake issued by a physician that causes harm to another due to his negligence or lack of expertise obligates him to guarantee liability and compensate the harmed party. The Sharia maxim, in this regard, states: "The direct actor is liable."
 
Ibn Qudamah (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "As for if he was skilled but his hand committed an error—such as exceeding the proper limit of incision, cutting in an incorrect site, cutting with an instrument that inflicts excessive pain, or cutting at an unsuitable time—he is liable, because it is destruction (Itlaf) whose liability does not differ between intent and mistake, thus resembling the destruction of property; and because it is a prohibited act, so he guarantees liability for its secondary effects." [Al-Mughni].
 
However, if the physician performed what was necessary in the most complete manner and took all measures of care and caution, but complications occurred that could not be avoided according to specialists, then no liability rests upon him.
 
Shaykh al-Islam Imam al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "The cupper and the circumciser bear no liability if they have not been negligent, and likewise the veterinarian if he bleeds an animal and it perishes." [Rawdat al-Talibin].
 
Al-Khattabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "I know of no disagreement that if the practitioner transgresses and the patient perishes, he is liable. Anyone who undertakes knowledge or practice he does not know is a transgressor; so if perishing arises from his action, he is liable for the blood-money (Diyah) while capital retaliation (Qisas) is dropped from him, because he did not act independently without the patient's permission. And the physician’s offense in the view of the generality of jurists is borne by his agnates ('Aqilah*)."* [Ma'alim al-Sunan].
 
If negligence or transgression is established against the physician, it is necessary to compensate the patient or seek forgiveness from him. And Allah Almighty knows best.