عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(57): "Ruling on Halalcom Card Issued by Middle Solutions Company (MSC)"

Date Added : 10-02-2016

 

Resolution No.(57): "Ruling on Halalcom Card Issued by Middle Solutions Company (MSC)"

Date:12/10/1422 AH, corresponding to 26/12/2001.

 

The Board has received the following question:

What is the ruling of Islamic Sharia on Halalcom card, which "Middle Solutions Company" intends to put into circulation. For further clarification, I will refer to the following:

The relationship between the company and the client:

The company issues Halalcom card, which enables the client to purchase any product in the company`s possession, or any of its branches in Jordan. After the issuance of Halalcom card to the client, he/she is given a certain number through which each independent act of purchase is dealt with, and each transaction constitutes an independent contract in its own right. The client pays (3%) from the overall value of the invoice, and repays the rest as equal monthly installments, up to (26) as a maximum. Moreover, the client can`t withdraw any cash amounts through this card, it doesn`t authorize him/her to purchase products from other companies, he/she doesn`t pay any interests for the installments, or any other sums added to the overall value of the product`s price, which has the same value whether it was paid for in cash or by installments.

The relationship between Jordan Ahli Bank and the client of the {MSC}.

There is no relationship between the Bank and the {MSC} clients.

As regards the relationship between the {MSC} and the Jordan Ahli Bank:

The Bank issues the above card on the following grounds:

A- Owing to the fact that the Jordan Ahli Bank is the only bank in the H.K.J which is fully qualified to issue and deal with credit cards in line with the instructions of the Jordan Central Bank, it has agreed with the {MSC} to issue cards holding the name of the latter, with the logo "Halalcom" inscribed under the its name. The Bank`s task is to issue these cards. In return, it charges two and a half JDs for each card it issues to  the company`s clients; still, the latter aren`t charged with any amount.

B- Consequently, the Bank doesn`t charge the client or the company with any interest or amounts in return for the issuance of the cards.

C- The Bank is obliged to preserve the credibility of the cards it issues to the company`s clients, and to guarantee that they aren`t tied to cash bonds or deposits.

The above summarizes how these cards, to be put into circulation, operate, hoping that your Fatwa includes the position of Sharia in the following situations:

A- The company sells its products via these cards (Halalcom), where the cash price is paid via installments, and no extra charges or interests is collected in return.

B- The company may buy a product, which it doesn`t have, from the local market upon the client`s request, then sells it to him/her for its cash price through installments after determining the cash price of that product , and at the same time acquainting the client with that price when concluding that deal. This is provided that the profit margin is reasonable and within the proper limits.

Moreover, the client can purchase any of the company`s products through Islamic Murabaha…?

Answer:

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

The Iftaa` Board has reviewed the above, and came to realize that the company gives that card to the client who purchases any of its products through an installment-sale contract concluded between the two parties without any interests, and without charging the client with any amounts in return for getting that card.

Having reviewed the letter of the Jordan Ahli Bank`s manager by our Board, in which the former clarified the nature of that card within the letter and how it operates, our view that it doesn`t involve any interests, and that the Bank`s task is to issue it in return for an annual fee paid by the company.

The Installment-sale method adopted by (MSC) via the above mentioned card is permissible so long as it involves zero-interest and complies with the rules of Islamic Sharia. Moreover, it is permissible for the (MSC) to employ Islamic Murabaha provided that it adheres to its Sharia rules and conditions. And Allah Knows Best.

Iftaa` Board
Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, Chief Justice, Izz Al-Deen Al-Tamimi

                   Dr. Mohammad Abu Yahia       

                  Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi       

    Sheikh Saeid Hijjawi

        Sheikh Na`eim Mojahid

Dr. Wasif Al-Bakhri

     Dr. Yousef Gheezaan

 

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on wiping over socks?

It is not permissible to wipe over most common socks today because the conditions for wiping are not met. The concession was reported for wiping over leather socks (khuff) and socks (jowrab) with conditions: They must be thick, not allowing poured water to penetrate, enable one to walk in them, be worn while in a state of purity (from ablution), cover the entire foot up to the ankles (meaning covering the protruding ankle bones), and not be torn. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What should a person who was favored from Allah with a newborn, but couldn`t afford an Aqeeqah, do?

Aqeeqah (the sheep slaughtered on the seventh day from the child`s birth) is a desirable Sunnah for the financially able since Allah, The Exalted, charges not a soul beyond its capacity. Therefore, if the father couldn`t afford the Aqeeqah before the end of his wife`s confinement, then it isn`t due on him, and if he was able to afford it later on, then it is permissible, but if he didn`t until the child reached puberty, the latter can offer the Aqeeqah himself.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

If the menses lasted for over than 9 to 10 days, considered menstruation?

If the duration of the bleeding does not exceed fifteen days, it is all considered menstruation, even if the usual pattern changes.

See More