عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(53): “ Ruling on Awards Offered by the Islamic Bank in Accordance with a Particular Mechanism“

Date Added : 02-11-2015

 

Resolution No.(53): "Ruling on Awards Offered by the Islamic Bank in Accordance with a Particular Mechanism“

Date: 8/8/1422 AH corresponding to 24/10/2001 AD

 

The Board recieved the following question:

What is the ruling when the Islamic Bank offers incentive awards to clients, who have investment accounts, in accordance with a particular mechanism (volume of the account, duration, added sums, and stability of the account)? How can we define the relation between the above clients and the Islamic Bank in light of these awards: a contract or an independent initiative on the part of the bank? If it is a contract, is it binding or not?

Answer: All success is due to Allah.

The Board of Iftaa` is of the view that it is permissible for the executive board of the Islamic Bank to distribute cash or in-kind incentive awards on these clients, and to cover their expenses in Hajj (pilgrimage) or Umrah (minor pilgrimage) or the like, if it is entitled to do so, provided that these awards are covered from the bank`s own earnings.

Moreover, it is impermissible for the bank to cover these awards from the total of the investment profits because this entails giving a portion from the share of the owners of these accounts as a sort of contribution, and this is forbidden in Sharia because the Mudarib (bank) isn`t allowed to give from the money of the Mudarabah (co-partnership), except with the permission of the owners (clients who have investment accounts). If they allow that, then it is permissible for the bank to cover these awards from its overall profit. In this case, offering these awards is considered a donation/grant on the part of the bank, and becomes a binding promise if it had made an announcement about that earlier. In addition, it can`t be considered a condition in the Mudarabah contract between the bank and the owners of the investment accounts because some of them may receive awards; whereas, others may not.

In this case, the board of directors enjoys the authority to lay down the legal terms and regulations pertaining to giving these awards (volume of the account, duration, added sums, and withdrawals), and to determine the type of the investment account (savings, deferred etc.) eligible for that, whether to all clients or to some of them.

Moreover, it isn`t permissible for the bank to distribute these awards on the owners of credit accounts (current accounts) for there is a suspicion of Riba (usury) similar to the ruling on loans because every loan that leads to a benefit is unlawful.

Based on the aforementioned, it is obvious that the relation between the Islamic Bank and the investors in light of these awards isn`t contractual, rather, it is an individual initiative undertaken by the free will of the Bank`s Administration. And Allah Knows Best.

Iftaa` Board
Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, Chief Justice, Izz Al-Deen Al-Tamimi
            Dr. Mohammad Abu Yahia
           Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi
    Dr. Yousef Gheezaan
Dr. Wasif Al-Bakhri
   Sheikh Saeid Hijjawi
        Sheikh Na`eim Mojahid

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on the ablution of one who touches women prohibited to him by a temporary prohibition (mahram bi-hurma mu'aqqata)?

It is prohibited to touch a woman who is temporarily prohibited (meaning one whom it becomes permissible to marry after the impediment is removed, such as the wife of a brother or paternal uncle). Touching her without a barrier invalidates ablution. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, and is it permissible to slaughter the ewe if one knows it is pregnant?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a person slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, the fetus becomes lawful (ḥalāl) by virtue of its mother's slaughter (tabaʿan li-ummihā).
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.6/P.158): "A fetus found dead [after the mother's slaughter], or found alive but in a state resembling that of a slaughtered animal [i.e., dying shortly after], becomes lawful — whether or not it had grown fur — provided it is found in the womb of a mother that was lawfully slaughtered, whether her slaughter was by cutting the throat, or by an arrow or hunting dog sent after her. This is based on the ḥadīth: 'The slaughtering of the fetus is [effected by] the slaughtering of its mother' [narrated by al-Tirmidhī, who graded it ḥasan, and by Ibn Ḥibbān, who graded it ṣaḥīḥ] — meaning that the slaughter which rendered the mother lawful renders the fetus lawful as well, by virtue of following her; and because the fetus is one of her constituent parts, and her slaughter renders lawful all of her parts."
This ruling differs, however, from the case of one who knows from the outset that the ewe is pregnant [and intends to sacrifice her specifically as the udḥiyah while pregnant] — in which case, according to the Shāfi'ī school, she does not fulfill the requirement of a valid sacrifice.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Bujayrimī 'alā al-Khaṭīb (Vol.4/P.335): "A pregnant animal does not fulfill the requirement [of a valid sacrifice], and this is the authoritative position (al-mu'tamad), because pregnancy diminishes the quality of the meat. As for why such an animal is nevertheless counted as complete [i.e., fully valid] in matters of zakāh, that is because the intent there is reproduction (nasl), not the quality of the meat.". And Allah, the Most High, knows best.

What is the ruling on praying seated due to severe obesity, given that I experience hardship in performing the prayer — especially when rising from the ground after sujūd to perform the next rak‘ah?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Standing, when one is able to do so, is a pillar of the prayer. However, whoever would experience severe, intolerable hardship, or fears harm to himself or to a limb due to obesity, or finds that standing causes him to lose his khushū‘ (humble focus and concentration) in prayer, then there is no objection to his praying seated on a chair or on the ground, performing rukū‘ (bowing) and sujūd (prostration) through gesture — provided that the gesture for sujūd is made lower than that for rukū‘. Whoever is able, at any point, to properly perform any one of these pillars, is obligated to perform it in full; for omitting it is a concession that applies only in cases of genuine inability. The Prophet ﷺ said: "When I command you to do something, do of it whatever you are able." (Related by al-Bukhārī). As the scholars of fiqh have established: what remains possible is not waived on account of what is difficult.
The criterion for determining genuine inability, as chosen by Imam al-Ḥaramayn al-Juwaynī (raḥimahullāh), is that the worshipper experiences hardship that causes him to lose his khushū‘.
As for voluntary (nafl) prayer, there is no objection to performing it while seated, even if one is able to stand. However, rukū‘ and sujūd must still be performed [in their proper physical form] by anyone who is able to do so. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

Is it permissible for the person who hasn`t made wudu` (state of minor ritual impurity) to perform the Adhan?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is disliked (Makruh) for a person in a state of minor ritual impurity (Hadath Asghar) to perform the Adhan. However, if he does so, his Adhan is considered valid and fulfills the sunnah of the Adhan despite it being disliked. And Allah the Exalted knows best.

See More