Articles

"I Don't Know" Is Half of Knowledge
Author : Dr. Fadi Rabab`ah
Date Added : 17-09-2026

"I Don't Know" Is Half of Knowledge

At a time when some people feel embarrassed to say "I don't know" when asked about certain matters — regarding this as a sign of ignorance or a blow to their standing — Islamic Sharī‘ah actually requires the Muslim to speak only about what he genuinely knows. Allah, the Exalted, says {what means}: "And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart — about all those [one] will be questioned" [al-Isrā'/36]. Ibn ‘Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā) said, explaining this verse: "Do not say 'I saw' when you did not see, 'I heard' when you did not hear, or 'I knew' when you did not know." [Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī, Vol.5/P.123]

Saying "I don't know" about matters one genuinely has no knowledge of is, in fact, a sign of self-respect and integrity. It reflects an avoidance of deceiving or misleading others, who might otherwise suffer harm or embarrassment as a result. It also guards against invalid conclusions across the full range of issues connected to matters of creed ('aqīdah), sharī‘ah rulings, and the social, educational, psychological, medical, and professional sciences — all fields in which verification, accuracy, and the avoidance of error are essential.

To establish the soundness and positive nature of saying "I don't know," the Noble Qur'an points out that the prophets, peace be upon them, themselves used to say this very phrase regarding matters on which Allah, the Exalted, had not revealed knowledge to them. This is reflected in Allah's words {which mean}: "But if they turn away, then say, 'I have announced to [all of] you equally. And I know not whether near or far is that which you are promised'" [al-Anbiyā'/109]. As explained in Tafsīr al-Baghawī: "'And I know not' — meaning, I do not know — 'whether near or far is that which you are promised' — referring to the Day of Resurrection." Similarly, Allah says {what means}: "And I know not; perhaps it is a trial for you and enjoyment for a time" [al-Anbiyā'/111] — meaning, "I do not know." And Allah says {what means}: "Say, [O Muḥammad], 'I am not something original among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am not but a clear warner'" [al-Aḥqāf/9] — meaning, "I do not know."

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ, when asked about certain matters, would himself say: "I do not know, until I ask Jibrīl [Gabriel]." Among such instances: a man once asked the Prophet ﷺ which places on earth are best, and which are worst. He ﷺ said: "I do not know, until I ask Jibrīl, peace be upon him." So he asked Jibrīl, who said: "I do not know, until I ask Mīkā'īl [Michael]." Mīkā'īl then came and said: "The best of places are the mosques, and the worst of places are the marketplaces." [Related by Ibn Ḥibbān, 1599]

Among such instances as well is what he ﷺ said to Umm al-‘Alā' (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhā), when she said: "‘Uthmān ibn Maẓ‘ūn came to us by lot for lodging, when the Anṣār drew lots for the lodging of the Muhājirūn (Emigrants). He then fell ill, and we nursed him until he passed away. We then wrapped him in his garments, and the Messenger of Allah ﷺ came to visit us. I said: 'May Allah's mercy be upon you, Abū as-Sā'ib — I bear witness that Allah has surely honored you.' The Prophet ﷺ said: 'And how do you know that?' I said: 'I do not know, by Allah.' He ﷺ said: 'As for him, certainty [i.e., death] has come to him. I do indeed hope good for him from Allah — yet by Allah, even though I am the Messenger of Allah, I do not know what will be done with me, nor with you.'" Umm al-‘Alā' said: "By Allah, after that, I never again declared anyone [definitively] pure [of sin]." [Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 7018]

 ‘Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib (raḍiyallāhu ‘anh) said: "Part of a man's knowledge is that he says, regarding what he does not know, 'Allah knows best' — for Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, said to His Messenger ﷺ: 'Say, I do not ask you for it any payment, and I am not of the pretentious'" [referring to Sūrat Ṣād/86]. He also said: "Among the most soothing things for the heart is that a man, when asked about something he does not know, says: 'Allah knows best.'"

Ibn ‘Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā) said: "When the scholar abandons saying 'I don't know,' his most vital point [i.e., his intellectual integrity] has been struck." On the authority of Ibn ‘Umar (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā), he said: "Knowledge is of three kinds: a speaking Book [the Qur'an], an established Sunnah, and 'I don't know.'" Mālik [ibn Anas] said: "It used to be said: when the scholar neglects to say 'I don't know,' his most vital point has been struck."

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ — the leader of the Muslims and master of all the worlds — would sometimes be asked about a matter and would not answer until revelation came to him from the heavens. Ash-Sha‘bī said: "'I don't know' is half of knowledge." [al-Ādāb ash-Shar‘iyyah wal-Minaḥ al-Mar‘iyyah, by Ibn Muflih, Vol.2/P.58]

Neglecting to say "I don't know" when one genuinely lacks knowledge negatively affects a person's life and conduct across various domains — whether religious, humanitarian, medical, or professional — leading people into sin, embarrassment, and harm. It also exposes anyone who speaks on such matters [without knowledge] to sharī‘ah accountability, legal liability, and financial responsibility for any damage resulting from their hesitant, unfounded speech. This is based on the words of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ: "Whoever issues a fatwā without sound basis, its sin falls upon the one who issued it." [Related by Abū Dāwūd (3657), Aḥmad (8266), and Ibn Mājah (53)]

Likewise, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Whoever practices medicine without being known to possess medical knowledge is liable [for any resulting harm]." [Related by Abū Dāwūd (4586), an-Nasā'ī (4830), and Ibn Mājah (3466)]

The scholar Ibn Farḥūn al-Mālikī (raḥimahullāh) said: "As for when the physician is ignorant, or acts beyond what he was authorized to do due to error, or exceeds the permitted limits of his authorization, or falls short of the required standard — he is liable for whatever damage results from that." [Tabṣirat al-Ḥukkām, Vol.2/P.340]

Imam al-Khaṭṭābī (raḥimahullāh) said: "I know of no disagreement [among scholars] that if a treating physician oversteps [his bounds] and the patient is harmed as a result, he is held liable." [Ma‘ālim as-Sunan, Vol.4/P.39]

From all of the above, it becomes clear that a person's saying "I don't know," regarding matters he genuinely has no knowledge of, does not diminish his scholarly standing — rather, it strengthens his credibility and drives him to seek further knowledge, in keeping with what Allah, the Exalted, instructed His noble Messenger ﷺ to say: "And say, 'My Lord, increase me in knowledge'" [Ṭāhā/114]. This is because knowledge varies from one person to another, as Allah, the Exalted, says {what means}: "And above every possessor of knowledge is one [more] knowing" [Yūsuf, /76]. Qatādah said, in explaining this verse: "[This continues] until knowledge ultimately reaches Allah — from Him it began, and from Him the scholars learned, and to Him it shall return." [Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī, Vol.4/P.213]

A Muslim, then, should never hesitate to say "I don't know" when he genuinely lacks knowledge, understanding, or familiarity with a matter he is asked about.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, and is it permissible to slaughter the ewe if one knows it is pregnant?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a person slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, the fetus becomes lawful (ḥalāl) by virtue of its mother's slaughter (tabaʿan li-ummihā).
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.6/P.158): "A fetus found dead [after the mother's slaughter], or found alive but in a state resembling that of a slaughtered animal [i.e., dying shortly after], becomes lawful — whether or not it had grown fur — provided it is found in the womb of a mother that was lawfully slaughtered, whether her slaughter was by cutting the throat, or by an arrow or hunting dog sent after her. This is based on the ḥadīth: 'The slaughtering of the fetus is [effected by] the slaughtering of its mother' [narrated by al-Tirmidhī, who graded it ḥasan, and by Ibn Ḥibbān, who graded it ṣaḥīḥ] — meaning that the slaughter which rendered the mother lawful renders the fetus lawful as well, by virtue of following her; and because the fetus is one of her constituent parts, and her slaughter renders lawful all of her parts."
This ruling differs, however, from the case of one who knows from the outset that the ewe is pregnant [and intends to sacrifice her specifically as the udḥiyah while pregnant] — in which case, according to the Shāfi'ī school, she does not fulfill the requirement of a valid sacrifice.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Bujayrimī 'alā al-Khaṭīb (Vol.4/P.335): "A pregnant animal does not fulfill the requirement [of a valid sacrifice], and this is the authoritative position (al-mu'tamad), because pregnancy diminishes the quality of the meat. As for why such an animal is nevertheless counted as complete [i.e., fully valid] in matters of zakāh, that is because the intent there is reproduction (nasl), not the quality of the meat.". And Allah, the Most High, knows best.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

Is it permissible for a woman to ride a taxi without a Mahram (unmarriageable kin) in order to attend a gathering of knowledge?

It is permissible for the woman to pursue the knowledge that she needs in order to perform the religious requirements due on her if there was nobody to teach her at home, provided that there is no temptation involved. Moreover, we don`t recommend that she rides a taxi without a Mahram although such an act isn`t from the forbidden Khulwah (seclusion).

What should a person who doubted having missed a pillar of prayer do?

All praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds.                                                                                                                                                                              The prayer of one who doubts having missed one of its pillars is valid, and nothing is due on him/her since having a doubt after offering the act of worship doesn`t undermine its validity. And Allah Knows Best.