Articles

"I Don't Know" Is Half of Knowledge
Author : Dr. Fadi Rabab`ah
Date Added : 17-09-2026

"I Don't Know" Is Half of Knowledge

At a time when some people feel embarrassed to say "I don't know" when asked about certain matters — regarding this as a sign of ignorance or a blow to their standing — Islamic Sharī‘ah actually requires the Muslim to speak only about what he genuinely knows. Allah, the Exalted, says {what means}: "And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart — about all those [one] will be questioned" [al-Isrā'/36]. Ibn ‘Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā) said, explaining this verse: "Do not say 'I saw' when you did not see, 'I heard' when you did not hear, or 'I knew' when you did not know." [Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī, Vol.5/P.123]

Saying "I don't know" about matters one genuinely has no knowledge of is, in fact, a sign of self-respect and integrity. It reflects an avoidance of deceiving or misleading others, who might otherwise suffer harm or embarrassment as a result. It also guards against invalid conclusions across the full range of issues connected to matters of creed ('aqīdah), sharī‘ah rulings, and the social, educational, psychological, medical, and professional sciences — all fields in which verification, accuracy, and the avoidance of error are essential.

To establish the soundness and positive nature of saying "I don't know," the Noble Qur'an points out that the prophets, peace be upon them, themselves used to say this very phrase regarding matters on which Allah, the Exalted, had not revealed knowledge to them. This is reflected in Allah's words {which mean}: "But if they turn away, then say, 'I have announced to [all of] you equally. And I know not whether near or far is that which you are promised'" [al-Anbiyā'/109]. As explained in Tafsīr al-Baghawī: "'And I know not' — meaning, I do not know — 'whether near or far is that which you are promised' — referring to the Day of Resurrection." Similarly, Allah says {what means}: "And I know not; perhaps it is a trial for you and enjoyment for a time" [al-Anbiyā'/111] — meaning, "I do not know." And Allah says {what means}: "Say, [O Muḥammad], 'I am not something original among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am not but a clear warner'" [al-Aḥqāf/9] — meaning, "I do not know."

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ, when asked about certain matters, would himself say: "I do not know, until I ask Jibrīl [Gabriel]." Among such instances: a man once asked the Prophet ﷺ which places on earth are best, and which are worst. He ﷺ said: "I do not know, until I ask Jibrīl, peace be upon him." So he asked Jibrīl, who said: "I do not know, until I ask Mīkā'īl [Michael]." Mīkā'īl then came and said: "The best of places are the mosques, and the worst of places are the marketplaces." [Related by Ibn Ḥibbān, 1599]

Among such instances as well is what he ﷺ said to Umm al-‘Alā' (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhā), when she said: "‘Uthmān ibn Maẓ‘ūn came to us by lot for lodging, when the Anṣār drew lots for the lodging of the Muhājirūn (Emigrants). He then fell ill, and we nursed him until he passed away. We then wrapped him in his garments, and the Messenger of Allah ﷺ came to visit us. I said: 'May Allah's mercy be upon you, Abū as-Sā'ib — I bear witness that Allah has surely honored you.' The Prophet ﷺ said: 'And how do you know that?' I said: 'I do not know, by Allah.' He ﷺ said: 'As for him, certainty [i.e., death] has come to him. I do indeed hope good for him from Allah — yet by Allah, even though I am the Messenger of Allah, I do not know what will be done with me, nor with you.'" Umm al-‘Alā' said: "By Allah, after that, I never again declared anyone [definitively] pure [of sin]." [Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 7018]

 ‘Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib (raḍiyallāhu ‘anh) said: "Part of a man's knowledge is that he says, regarding what he does not know, 'Allah knows best' — for Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, said to His Messenger ﷺ: 'Say, I do not ask you for it any payment, and I am not of the pretentious'" [referring to Sūrat Ṣād/86]. He also said: "Among the most soothing things for the heart is that a man, when asked about something he does not know, says: 'Allah knows best.'"

Ibn ‘Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā) said: "When the scholar abandons saying 'I don't know,' his most vital point [i.e., his intellectual integrity] has been struck." On the authority of Ibn ‘Umar (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā), he said: "Knowledge is of three kinds: a speaking Book [the Qur'an], an established Sunnah, and 'I don't know.'" Mālik [ibn Anas] said: "It used to be said: when the scholar neglects to say 'I don't know,' his most vital point has been struck."

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ — the leader of the Muslims and master of all the worlds — would sometimes be asked about a matter and would not answer until revelation came to him from the heavens. Ash-Sha‘bī said: "'I don't know' is half of knowledge." [al-Ādāb ash-Shar‘iyyah wal-Minaḥ al-Mar‘iyyah, by Ibn Muflih, Vol.2/P.58]

Neglecting to say "I don't know" when one genuinely lacks knowledge negatively affects a person's life and conduct across various domains — whether religious, humanitarian, medical, or professional — leading people into sin, embarrassment, and harm. It also exposes anyone who speaks on such matters [without knowledge] to sharī‘ah accountability, legal liability, and financial responsibility for any damage resulting from their hesitant, unfounded speech. This is based on the words of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ: "Whoever issues a fatwā without sound basis, its sin falls upon the one who issued it." [Related by Abū Dāwūd (3657), Aḥmad (8266), and Ibn Mājah (53)]

Likewise, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Whoever practices medicine without being known to possess medical knowledge is liable [for any resulting harm]." [Related by Abū Dāwūd (4586), an-Nasā'ī (4830), and Ibn Mājah (3466)]

The scholar Ibn Farḥūn al-Mālikī (raḥimahullāh) said: "As for when the physician is ignorant, or acts beyond what he was authorized to do due to error, or exceeds the permitted limits of his authorization, or falls short of the required standard — he is liable for whatever damage results from that." [Tabṣirat al-Ḥukkām, Vol.2/P.340]

Imam al-Khaṭṭābī (raḥimahullāh) said: "I know of no disagreement [among scholars] that if a treating physician oversteps [his bounds] and the patient is harmed as a result, he is held liable." [Ma‘ālim as-Sunan, Vol.4/P.39]

From all of the above, it becomes clear that a person's saying "I don't know," regarding matters he genuinely has no knowledge of, does not diminish his scholarly standing — rather, it strengthens his credibility and drives him to seek further knowledge, in keeping with what Allah, the Exalted, instructed His noble Messenger ﷺ to say: "And say, 'My Lord, increase me in knowledge'" [Ṭāhā/114]. This is because knowledge varies from one person to another, as Allah, the Exalted, says {what means}: "And above every possessor of knowledge is one [more] knowing" [Yūsuf, /76]. Qatādah said, in explaining this verse: "[This continues] until knowledge ultimately reaches Allah — from Him it began, and from Him the scholars learned, and to Him it shall return." [Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī, Vol.4/P.213]

A Muslim, then, should never hesitate to say "I don't know" when he genuinely lacks knowledge, understanding, or familiarity with a matter he is asked about.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on one who feels drops of urine falling during ablution?

If he is certain that urine is exiting from him during ablution, then his ablution is invalidated. He must remove the impurity from his clothes and body and repeat the ablution.
However, if what he feels regarding urine exiting is merely doubt or illusion, then ablution is not invalidated by doubt and illusion. He should not pay attention to it, and it is not permissible for him to follow the doubt and whispers that corrupt his religion. And Allah the almighty knows best.

What are the legal and religious consequences for a charitable organization in the event that a sacrificial animal is damaged or spoiled after slaughter?

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
Charitable organizations entrusted with slaughtering sacrificial animals (uḍḥiyyah) and distributing their meat on behalf of their owners are obligated to safeguard the meat from spoilage, damage, theft, and any other harm. This is because such organizations act as agents (wukalā') on behalf of those offering the sacrifice, and an agent holds what is entrusted to them in trust (amānah) — whether they receive a wage for their work or act on a voluntary basis.
If the sacrificial animal is damaged after slaughter during the processes of packaging, transportation, or storage due to negligence or oversight — whether on the part of the organization's own staff overseeing the operation, or on the part of third parties contracted by the organization such as transport or shipping companies — then liability falls upon the negligent party, who is required to compensate for the value of the sacrifice. It is not permissible to cover such compensation from the organization's other donor funds.
However, if the damage to the sacrificial animal occurs without any negligence in its preservation and storage on the part of any party involved in the transportation, shipping, or storage process, and is instead attributable to force majeure circumstances beyond their control, then no financial liability is borne by any party in such a case. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What should someone do if they fasted for only 28 days in their country and then traveled to a place where Eid has already been declared?

If a person fasts in their country and then travels to another country where Eid has been declared, they must celebrate Eid with the people of that country.
● If their total fasts add up to 29 days, nothing is required of them.
● However, if they have only fasted 28 days, they must make up one day after Eid, because an Islamic month cannot be only 28 days.

A man led the people in prayer as imam, and at the end of the prayer he performed a prostration of forgetfulness (*sujūd al-sahw*) because he had omitted a short *sūrah* after al-Fātiḥah. What is the ruling on his prayer and that of those praying behind him?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
According to the Shāfiʿī school, it is sunnah to recite a sūrah after al-Fātiḥah in the prayer. One who omits it has a valid prayer, and no prostration of forgetfulness (sujūd al-sahw) is prescribed for omitting it. If someone performs sujūd al-sahw for its omission while knowing the ruling and remembering it, his prayer is invalidated. But one who is ignorant of the ruling, or who did so out of forgetfulness, his prayer is not invalidated, because this is among the matters that are obscure to people, and ignorance of it is not restricted to those who recently entered Islam.
Shaykh al-Islām al-Shams al-Ramlī said in Nihāyat al-Muḥtāj ilā Sharḥ al-Minhāj (Vol.2/p.70): “The remaining sunnahs are not compensated for by prostration, such as the remembrances (adhkār) of bowing and prostration, that is, the opening supplication (duʿāʾ al-iftitāḥ) and the sūrah, in accordance with the base rule, because they are not of the same nature as what has been reported [as compensable]. If one prostrates for any of them deliberately, his prayer is invalidated, unless he is excused due to ignorance. As for the objection raised that the ignorant person does not know that sujūd al-sahw is prescribed, and whoever knows it knows its place, this is refuted by denying such a necessary connection, for the ignorant person may hear only that sujūd al-sahw is prescribed before the salām, and so assume that it applies to every sunnah and is not restricted to its prescribed place.”
This is among the matters that are obscure, in which the mukallaf is excused for ignorance, as stated by al-Shabrāmallisī in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā Nihāyat al-Muḥtāj (Vol.2/p.70).
However, if the imam prostrates, and the follower (maʾmūm) presumes that his imam’s prostration is for a reason for which one does not prostrate, it is not permissible to follow him in it, so long as the follower knows the ruling.
Accordingly, the prayer of one who did not recite a sūrah after al-Fātiḥah is valid, and sujūd al-sahw is not prescribed for it. Whoever prostrates out of ignorance or forgetfulness, his prayer is valid, because this is among the issues hidden from the general public. But whoever prostrates while knowing the ruling and remembering it, his prayer is invalidated. And Allah Almighty knows best.