عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Reality of Faith (Al-Iman)
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 30-03-2026

The Reality of Faith (Al-Iman)

 

Allah the Almighty sent the Archangel Gabriel (Jibril) to ask the Prophet ﷺ essential questions as a means of teaching the Ummah. Among these was the pivotal question: "What is Iman (Faith)?" To understand our religion, we must take a focused look at the meaning of faith and the scholarly nuances surrounding it.

In essence, Iman is the heart’s internal conviction (Tasdiq) in everything brought by our Master Muhammad ﷺ that is "necessarily known to be part of the religion" (Ma’lum min al-din bi al-darurah). These are matters so fundamental that they require no complex deduction, such as the obligation of Prayer, Fasting, Zakat, and Hajj, or the prohibition of usury, adultery, gambling, injustice, and alcohol.

Iman is the very first obligation upon a morally and legally responsible person (Mukallaf). Its foundation is the heart’s affirmation, free from doubt or hesitation, coupled with "submission and compliance" (Idh’an) to the truth of the Prophet’s message.

The primary evidence that faith is an act of the heart is Allah’s statement: "Those—He has written faith in their hearts." [Al-Mujadilah/22]. This verse, among many other textual proofs, demonstrates that the true location of faith is the heart.

One might ask: What about the famous definition by some scholars that faith is "speech by the tongue, conviction by the heart, and action by the limbs"?

The answer is that this is a description of the perfection of faith (Kamal al-Iman), not its minimum requirement for validity (Asl al-Iman). While the heart’s conviction is the root, the declaration of the Two Testimonies (Shahadatayn) and the performance of good deeds are the fruits that complete and perfect it.

Pronouncing the Shahadah is a condition for applying worldly legal rulings to a person (such as marriage, inheritance, and burial in Muslim cemeteries). It is not technically a "part" or "pillar" of the internal reality of faith itself.

The Mute or Incapable: If someone truly believes in their heart but is physically unable to speak (due to a condition like being mute), they are saved in the sight of Allah.

The Silent Believer: If a person recognizes the truth and submits in their heart but passes away before anyone asks them to testify—provided they weren't stubborn or refusing—they are a believer before Allah, though they were not treated as Muslims in this life because they never voiced their belief.

The Stubborn Refuser: If someone is asked to testify and refuses out of arrogance or spite (without a valid excuse like fear), they are considered a disbeliever, as their refusal indicates a lack of internal submission.

Born Muslims: A person born to Muslim parents who believes in their heart but neglects to verbally recite the Shahadah is a "sinful Muslim" because they neglected a secondary obligation, but they remain within the fold of Islam.

As Imam Ibn Hajar al-Haytami explained in Al-Tuhfah: "Faith, according to the theologians, has two perspectives: salvation in the Hereafter—which depends solely on internal conviction—and the application of worldly rulings—which depends on the verbal testimony."

Good deeds are not a pillar of faith's existence, but they are the cause of its increase and strength. Faith is dynamic; it increases with obedience and decreases with sin, but the "root" (the conviction in the heart) does not vanish simply due to a sin. Allah says: "The believers are only those who, when Allah is mentioned, their hearts become fearful, and when His verses are recited to them, it increases them in faith..." [Al-Anfal/2].

Based on this understanding, a person who falls short in their religious duties (like someone who misses prayer out of laziness) is not a disbeliever as long as they do not deny that the prayer is obligatory. Similarly, someone who commits a sin (like drinking alcohol out of weakness) is not a disbeliever as long as they do not claim that the sin is "permissible" (Halal). They remain a believer, though their faith is deficient and they are in need of repentance.

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on one who wiped over his leather socks (*khuff*) while resident and then traveled, or wiped while traveling and then became resident? And likewise, what is the ruling on one who incurred a minor ritual impurity (*ḥadath aṣghar*) while resident, then traveled and wiped while traveling?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
Whoever wipes over his leather socks (khuffayn) while resident and then travels, or wipes while traveling and then becomes resident, before a day and a night have passed in both cases, completes the wiping period of a resident. If he wipes while resident and then travels after a day and a night have passed, he must remove the socks, because the period has ended. Likewise, if he wipes while traveling and then becomes resident after a day and a night have passed, he must remove them as well.
Whoever breaks his wuḍūʾ while resident and then wipes while traveling takes the ruling of a traveler as regards the duration of wiping, so long as he does not become resident. It is stated in ʿUmdat al-Sālik wa ʿUddat al-Nāsik (Vol.1/p.15): “If he wipes over both [socks] or one of them while resident and then travels, or wipes while traveling and then becomes resident, or doubts whether he began the wiping while traveling or while resident, he completes only the wiping period of a resident. But if he broke his wuḍūʾ while resident and wiped while traveling, he completes the period of a traveler, whether or not the full time of a prayer had passed over him while resident.” And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on a second congregation [being formed] in the mosque?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is disliked to deliberately seek to establish a second congregation in a mosque that is not one frequented by transient passersby — such as a neighborhood mosque with a regular, appointed imam — unless permission is granted by that imam, since doing so implies criticism and an affront to him. However, if the mosque is one frequented by transient passersby — such as mosques located in marketplaces — then a second or even third congregation is permissible there, whether or not it has a regular, appointed imam, and whether or not that imam gives his permission. This is because such mosques experience a continuous flow of people coming and going, so no implication of criticism toward the imam is perceived in the formation of multiple congregations in that setting. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on someone who wakes up in a state of janābah (major ritual impurity) near the very end of the prayer's designated time, during cold weather — should he heat water in order to perform ghusl, even though the prayer's time will expire as a result, or should he perform tayammum instead?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
If the water is cold, and cannot be used due to fear of harm that is not ordinarily tolerable, or that would result in illness, then in this case it becomes obligatory to heat the water — even if heating it causes the time for Fajr to expire — and no sin is incurred in doing so, due to his valid excuse. He may not resort to tayammum (dry ablution) instead, since water remains available [and merely needs to be heated].
Imam Shihāb ad-Dīn Aḥmad ar-Ramlī (raḥimahullāh) said: "He was asked regarding a person who, if he were to use cold water, would experience harm that permits tayammum, and who has access to something with which he could heat the water — but if he heats it, the prayer's time will expire. Is it obligatory for him to heat it even if the time expires, or should he pray with tayammum within the prescribed time? He answered that it is obligatory for him to heat the water, even if the time for that particular obligatory prayer expires." [Fatāwā ar-Ramlī, Vol.1/P.98]
Imam al-Bājūrī (raḥimahullāh) said in his Ḥāshiyah on Sharḥ Ibn Qāsim (Vol.1/P.173): "And if he fears [harm] from using cold water, and is currently unable to heat it, but knows of a place where firewood is available, such that if he were to go there he would not return until after the prescribed time has expired — what appears [to be the correct position] is that it is obligatory for him to go and seek the firewood, even if the time expires as a result, as this is the position ultimately settled upon by ar-Ramlī, and as related from him by Ibn Qāsim." And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

Is it permissible for one who sacrifices on behalf of another, with the latter's permission, to eat from the sacrifice?

It is permissible for someone who sacrificed on behalf of another with their permission to eat from it with their permission, and they stand in their place (act as their representative) in distributing it.
 
It is stated in Nihayat al-Muhtaj ila Sharh al-Minhaj (Vol.8/P.141): "And he—meaning the one sacrificing on his own behalf, provided he has not apostatized—has the right to eat from a voluntary sacrifice and his sacrificial gift; rather, it is recommended. As for an obligatory sacrifice, it is forbidden for him to eat from it, whether it was designated as such initially or as a liability in his dhimmah. And excluded by what has preceded is if he sacrifices on behalf of another, or if he apostatized, then it is not permissible for him to eat from it, just as it is absolutely impermissible to feed a disbeliever from it."(The text I found indicates the impermissibility of eating) ???
 
And it is stated in Hashiyat al-Jamal ‘ala Sharh al-Manhaj (Vol.5/P.262): "If a person offers a sacrifice on behalf of a living person with their permission, does he act as their representative in distributing it—on the grounds that permission to sacrifice is permission to distribute it—or does it depend on their explicit permission? This requires consideration, but the first view is not far-fetched." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More