Articles

Scholars are the Inheritors of the Prophets
Author : Dr. Mohammad Al-Hunaiti
Date Added : 20-05-2025

Abdallah the son of Amr (May All Be Pleased with them) reported Allah’s messenger as saying: "Allah does not take away knowledge by removing it from men, but takes it away by taking away the learned, so that when He leaves no learned man, men will take ignorant men as leaders. Causes will be presented to them and they will pass judgment without knowledge, erring and leading others into error." [Agreed upon].

So, how devastating is the death of a scholar to the nation; for the death of a scholar is not like the death of any other person. Ibn Mas'ud, may Allah Be Pleased with him, said: "The death of a scholar is a fissure that nothing can mend as long as the night and day alternate." [Al-Bayhaqi in 'Shu'ab Al-Iman'].

There's no doubt that in every era of Islam, there have been scholars whom Allah, Glorified and Exalted, has Enabled to preserve His religion. They are the trustees of this religion and the inheritors of the Prophets who convey His religion, clarify the rulings of His law, and guide the nation to it.

On the authority of Abu Darda', may Allah Be Pleased with him, he said: "I heard the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, saying: "Whoever treads a path seeking knowledge, Allah will make easy for him a path to Paradise. Indeed, the angels lower their wings in approval of the seeker of knowledge. And indeed, everyone in the heavens and on earth, even the fish in the depths of the water, seek forgiveness for the scholar. And indeed, the superiority of the scholar over the worshiper is like the superiority of the moon on a full moon night over all other stars. And indeed, the scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets. Indeed, the Prophets did not bequeath dinars or dirhams; they bequeathed knowledge. So whoever takes it has taken a generous portion." [Abu Dawud and At-Tirmidhi].

The death of a scholar has a profound impact on the people of their era, due to the significant void it leaves among them. Here, we are speaking of the devout scholar whose words are consistent with their actions, and whose pronouncements do not differ from the deeds of their limbs.

 

There is no doubt that our affliction with the loss of our scholar and distinguished jurist, Sheikh Nuh Al-Qudhat (May Allah have mercy on him), is immense. This is because we have not lost an ordinary man, but rather a scholar and an educator. I don't believe anyone who knew the Sheikh or worked closely with him failed to gain immense benefit, which had a significant impact on their character and conduct. The Sheikh, may Allah have mercy on him, would teach you when he spoke, when he was silent, when he sat, and when he walked. Even those far from him received much of this benefit through reading his books and articles, and listening to his sermons and lessons.

Why would not it be so? The life of the Sheikh, may Allah have mercy on him, was full of love for knowledge and eagerness to acquire it. From his early years, he strived to seek knowledge and traveled to Al-Sham (Syria), where he gained knowledge from prominent scholars at the Institute of Sharia Sciences, which was affiliated with the Al-Gharra Society founded by Sheikh Ali Al-Daghar, may Allah have mercy on him. The Sheikh then continued his pursuit of knowledge at the University of Damascus to obtain his bachelor's degree, followed by travel to Cairo for his master's degree, and then to Saudi Arabia for his doctorate. After that, he dedicated himself to issuing fatwas, both within the armed forces and in civilian life.

Upon his passing, the Sheikh, may Allah have mercy on him, left us with a heavy burden. He entrusted every one of his students with the responsibility to follow his example and complete what he began and established. This is so that this good and righteous seed may become a magnificent tree whose shade every Muslim, from the east to the west of the earth, can enjoy and from whose fruits they can eat.

Therefore, O our Sheikh, may Allah have mercy on you. Our consolation in your passing is that your reward and recompense, by The Will of Allah, will continue until the Day of Judgment. This is because our Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "(When a person dies, all their deeds cease except for three: continuous charity (Sadaqah Jariyah), knowledge from which benefit is gained, and a righteous child who prays for them)." [Sunan An-Nasa'i]. And you, by The Will of Allah, have attained these three: beneficial knowledge, continuous charity, and a righteous child who prays for you. And indeed, your students are nothing but continuous charity for you, by the will of Allah."

May Allah, The Almighty, have mercy on you, O our Sheikh, and gather us with you and the righteous of this nation, alongside the Prophets and martyrs, in the abode of His Mercy in the highest Paradise. Indeed, He is The Guardian of that and is Capable of it.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on a suitor (khāṭib) going out alone with his fiancée before the marriage contract is concluded?

It is unlawful for a suitor, prior to the marriage contract , to do anything that would be unlawful for any non-maḥram man — including touching his fiancée, being secluded with her (khalwah), or seeing her without her complete sharī‘ah-compliant covering — even after the recitation of al-Fātiḥah (This is a cultural custom to seek Allah's blessing (barakah) and mark mutual consent) and the family's approval [of the engagement]. This is because the engagement, without the formal marriage contract, does not render unlawful matters permissible. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on one who wiped over his leather socks (*khuff*) while resident and then traveled, or wiped while traveling and then became resident? And likewise, what is the ruling on one who incurred a minor ritual impurity (*ḥadath aṣghar*) while resident, then traveled and wiped while traveling?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
Whoever wipes over his leather socks (khuffayn) while resident and then travels, or wipes while traveling and then becomes resident, before a day and a night have passed in both cases, completes the wiping period of a resident. If he wipes while resident and then travels after a day and a night have passed, he must remove the socks, because the period has ended. Likewise, if he wipes while traveling and then becomes resident after a day and a night have passed, he must remove them as well.
Whoever breaks his wuḍūʾ while resident and then wipes while traveling takes the ruling of a traveler as regards the duration of wiping, so long as he does not become resident. It is stated in ʿUmdat al-Sālik wa ʿUddat al-Nāsik (Vol.1/p.15): “If he wipes over both [socks] or one of them while resident and then travels, or wipes while traveling and then becomes resident, or doubts whether he began the wiping while traveling or while resident, he completes only the wiping period of a resident. But if he broke his wuḍūʾ while resident and wiped while traveling, he completes the period of a traveler, whether or not the full time of a prayer had passed over him while resident.” And Allah Almighty knows best.

I bought an apartment, and I am saving money to pay the remaining balance of its price — is zakāh obligatory on this money?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Zakāh is obligatory on all saved/hoarded wealth. Once the total wealth reaches the niṣāb (minimum threshold liable for zakah— equivalent to the value of 85 grams of pure 24-karat gold) and a full ḥawl (lunar year) has elapsed over it, zakāh becomes obligatory at a rate of (2.5%) — even if the wealth is earmarked for basic future needs, and even if the wealth's owner is in debt. Debt does not prevent the obligation of zakāh, nor is it deducted when calculating the zakāh due, based on the general and unrestricted wording of all the Qur'anic verses commanding zakāh, which draw no distinction between someone in debt and anyone else.
It is stated in ‘Umdat as-Sālik, from the books of the Shāfi‘ī school: "If someone possesses exactly the niṣāb, and owes an equivalent amount in debt, zakāh remains obligatory on what is in his possession, and the debt does not prevent this obligation" — meaning, the obligation of zakāh on what is presently in his possession.
The ḥawl (annual cycle) recognized for zakāh, as well as for the other sharī‘ah obligations that Allah, the Exalted, has imposed upon Muslims, is the Hijrī (lunar) year. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.