Articles

Some Secrets of Fasting
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 24-03-2025

Some Secrets of Fasting

 

The month of Ramadan comes once every year, and there is no doubt that it enjoys a great status. It is one of the five pillars upon which Islam is built. So, what is the secret behind the lofty position that this month holds?

To answer the above question, we must reflect on the meaning of fasting, which is abstaining from things that break the fast from dawn until sunset along with intending to fast. The main things that break the fast are food, drink, and marital relations.

So, is the purpose to make a person suffer by abstaining from what they are accustomed to, such as eating and drinking during the day? The answer is, of course not. Allah, the Most High, is Merciful to His servants; He bestows His mercy and kindness upon them. He does not intend to make them suffer, for He is entirely self-sufficient and not in need of them.

However, abstaining from food and drink during the day in Ramadan carries a number of important messages, the most notable of which are:

Feeling the blessings of Allah: A person does not truly realize the greatness and value of a blessing until they lose it. Through fasting, a person voluntarily experiences the absence of these blessings, which allows them to recognize their worth due to the natural need for them. This, in turn, positively impacts their behavior by fostering respect for the blessing, appreciation for it, and a commitment to preserving it. This reinforces the principle of maintaining wealth in any form and by any means.

Moreover, the feeling of empathy for the poor and the needy, who may have endured long nights of hunger, is strengthened. The fasting person, by experiencing hunger, enters into the emotional state of the hungry poor. This leads the wealthy fasting individual to feel more inclined to help their impoverished brothers and sisters, as they have tasted the hardship of hunger themselves. This reinforces the principle of social solidarity.

It is also clear that abstaining from food and drink during the day in Ramadan strengthens the self-discipline of believers. By refraining from what is permissible, it encourages the self to refrain from what is forbidden. Maintaining the fast, even when one has the ability to eat, trains the soul to exercise self-control, demonstrating the importance of self-monitoring in keeping away from that which Allah has forbidden.

From all that has been discussed, we can see that fasting has a profound philosophy in the life of both the individual and society. Preserving blessings, social solidarity, and self-monitoring are some of the key principles that individuals embody and that hold the community together.

Additionally, when a person experiences hunger, thirst, and an empty stomach, they naturally become more restless and receptive to wisdom. This makes them present in their worship and more closely connected with their Creator, thus making fasting nourishment for the soul.

The fasting person cannot achieve these benefits if they eat to excess. If they overindulge at Iftar and Suhoor, they may suffer from discomfort during the day. In this case, fasting loses its intended meaning, which is something we must be cautious of.

In conclusion, I ask Allah, the Almighty, to accept from us and from you all righteous deeds.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on giving the expiation of an oath (Kaffarat al-Yamin) to a charity that feeds the poor?

 

 

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.

It is allowed for a Muslim to appoint a proxy (agent) to distribute the expiation (Kaffarah) on their behalf. Our jurists have explicitly stated the permissibility of delegation (Tawkil) in the distribution of Zakat, Kaffarah, and vows (Nadr).

It is stated in Mughni al-Muhtaj (Vol.3/P.237): 'One has the right to pay the Zakat of their wealth personally... and they also have the right to delegate it.' And Allah the Exalted knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who purchases a sacrificial animal (uḍḥiyah) and it then develops a defect before slaughter?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a defect that invalidates the sacrifice (uḍḥiyah) arises after its purchase — for example, if one purchased a sound, defect-free animal, and it then developed a limp, blindness in one eye, or a similar defect before slaughter — it does not fulfill the requirement of a valid uḍḥiyah, according to the Shāfi'ī school.
It is stated in Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib (Vol.1/P.535): "Even if the limp develops [in the animal] while the knife is upon it, it still does not fulfill the requirement, because it is lame at the moment of slaughter — this is analogous to a case where a sheep's leg breaks and one hastens to slaughter it [in that condition]."
The Ḥanbalī school, however, held that if the one offering the sacrifice purchased the animal while it was sound and defect-free, and a defect then befell it afterward, the sacrifice remains valid and there is no obligation to replace it.
It is stated in Masā'il al-Imām Aḥmad, one of the Ḥanbalī reference works (Vol.8/P.4021): "I said: If a person purchases the sacrificial animal while it is sound, and it is then afflicted with illness, blindness in one eye, or a broken limb [before slaughter]? He [Imam Aḥmad] said: It is said that it still fulfills the requirement. Isḥāq said likewise, because he purchased it while sound, and the defect befell it only afterward, so it remains sufficient on his behalf." [End of quote]
Accordingly, a sheep afflicted with a defect that invalidates the sacrifice does not fulfill the requirement of a valid uḍḥiyah — whether the defect arose after purchase or during the slaughter itself — according to the Shāfi'ī school. However, there is no objection to following the Ḥanbalī position on this matter [as a valid alternative]. And Allah, the Most High, knows best.

My father has debts and asked me to repay them years ago, and I promised him I would do so upon his death — is it permissible for me to go back on my promise given that I am unable to repay them, especially since he refuses to contribute to repayment on the grounds that the debt has become my responsibility by virtue of my promise?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The established principle is that a father's debt is to be repaid from his own wealth, if he possesses sufficient means. As for the promise made by the son to repay it on his father's behalf, fulfilling such a promise is strongly recommended, and breaking it is considerably disliked. Shaykh al-Islām Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "Fulfilling a promise is emphatically recommended, and breaking it is severely disliked. The evidences for this from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah are well known." [Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn,Vol. 2/P.278] Shaykh al-Islām Imām Zakariyyā al-Anṣārī, may Allah have mercy upon him, further states: "The reason fulfilling a promise is not obligatory and breaking it is not forbidden is that a promise is in the nature of a gift, and a gift does not become binding except upon receipt." [Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib,Vol. 2/P.487]
Given that the son does not possess the financial means to fulfil his promise to his father, breaking this promise falls beyond his capacity — and Allah does not burden a soul beyond what it can bear. Since the father himself possesses sufficient wealth to settle his own debt, repayment must be made from his own funds. Should he pass away before doing so, the debt is to be settled from his estate. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is the son of the sister by breastfeeding considered a mahram in Islam, and is it permissible for a woman to go for Hajj with him?

Everything that is prohibited by lineage is also prohibited by breastfeeding. The son of the sister by breastfeeding is considered a mahram, just like the son of the sister by blood, and it is permissible for him to be her mahram for Hajj and Umrah. And Allah Knows Best.