عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

Some Secrets of Fasting
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 24-03-2025

Some Secrets of Fasting

 

The month of Ramadan comes once every year, and there is no doubt that it enjoys a great status. It is one of the five pillars upon which Islam is built. So, what is the secret behind the lofty position that this month holds?

To answer the above question, we must reflect on the meaning of fasting, which is abstaining from things that break the fast from dawn until sunset along with intending to fast. The main things that break the fast are food, drink, and marital relations.

So, is the purpose to make a person suffer by abstaining from what they are accustomed to, such as eating and drinking during the day? The answer is, of course not. Allah, the Most High, is Merciful to His servants; He bestows His mercy and kindness upon them. He does not intend to make them suffer, for He is entirely self-sufficient and not in need of them.

However, abstaining from food and drink during the day in Ramadan carries a number of important messages, the most notable of which are:

Feeling the blessings of Allah: A person does not truly realize the greatness and value of a blessing until they lose it. Through fasting, a person voluntarily experiences the absence of these blessings, which allows them to recognize their worth due to the natural need for them. This, in turn, positively impacts their behavior by fostering respect for the blessing, appreciation for it, and a commitment to preserving it. This reinforces the principle of maintaining wealth in any form and by any means.

Moreover, the feeling of empathy for the poor and the needy, who may have endured long nights of hunger, is strengthened. The fasting person, by experiencing hunger, enters into the emotional state of the hungry poor. This leads the wealthy fasting individual to feel more inclined to help their impoverished brothers and sisters, as they have tasted the hardship of hunger themselves. This reinforces the principle of social solidarity.

It is also clear that abstaining from food and drink during the day in Ramadan strengthens the self-discipline of believers. By refraining from what is permissible, it encourages the self to refrain from what is forbidden. Maintaining the fast, even when one has the ability to eat, trains the soul to exercise self-control, demonstrating the importance of self-monitoring in keeping away from that which Allah has forbidden.

From all that has been discussed, we can see that fasting has a profound philosophy in the life of both the individual and society. Preserving blessings, social solidarity, and self-monitoring are some of the key principles that individuals embody and that hold the community together.

Additionally, when a person experiences hunger, thirst, and an empty stomach, they naturally become more restless and receptive to wisdom. This makes them present in their worship and more closely connected with their Creator, thus making fasting nourishment for the soul.

The fasting person cannot achieve these benefits if they eat to excess. If they overindulge at Iftar and Suhoor, they may suffer from discomfort during the day. In this case, fasting loses its intended meaning, which is something we must be cautious of.

In conclusion, I ask Allah, the Almighty, to accept from us and from you all righteous deeds.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

The imam recited a verse containing a prostration of recitation (*sajdat al-tilāwah*) but did not prostrate. After the imam's *salām*, a follower (*maʾmūm*) performed a prostration of forgetfulness (*sujūd al-sahw*) because the imam had not performed the prostration of recitation. Is it permissible to go against the imam in this way?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
There is no sin on the imam if he omits the prostration of recitation (sujūd al-tilāwah), even deliberately. The maʾmūm (the one following the imam) is obliged to follow the imam in the prayer, so if the imam does not perform the prostration of recitation, it is not permissible for the follower to prostrate, because the imam is appointed only to be followed.
If the follower introduces a prostration after the imam’s salām but before his own salām, in a case where there is no prostration of forgetfulness (sujūd al-sahw), his prayer is invalidated if he knew it to be prohibited. Otherwise, he is excused on account of his ignorance and his prayer is not invalidated.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Imām al-Jamal ʿalā Fatḥ al-Wahhāb: “His statement: ‘So the omission of the hayʾāt (the non-essential sunnahs of the prayer) is not compensated for by prostration; if one prostrates for any of them deliberately, his prayer is invalidated, unless he is excused due to his ignorance.’”
Since this issue is one that is hidden from the laymen, as it is among the subtleties of knowledge, and the laymen are excused for ignorance of whatever is of such a nature, and their act of obedience is not invalidated because of it, it may be said that the prayer of one who has not acquired knowledge of this issue is not invalidated, with the necessity of learning the rulings remaining. As for after knowing it, the prayer is invalidated. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on giving Zakat al-Fitr in cash?

The default ruling is that Zakat al-Fitr should be given as the staple food of the land. In Jordan, for example, the staple food is wheat or rice, and the amount of Zakat al-Fitr is 2,500 grams per person. It is easy to give this amount of rice to the poor and needy, and this is the correct ruling according to all Islamic schools of thought.
However, Hanafi scholars have permitted giving Zakat al-Fitr as monetary value, considering it more beneficial for the poor and easier for the giver.

What is the ruling on istinja' after urination, and is it done with water and soap or with water only?

Istinja' from urine and stool is obligatory. It is permissible to perform istinja' with water alone, or with toilet paper alone. The best way is with toilet paper then water. If one wishes to suffice with one of them, then water is better. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

See More