عربي
Home


Articles
الموقع الرئيسي

Articles

The Rights Related to the Estate
Author : Dr. Mufti Sa`eid Farhan
Date Added : 09-10-2024

 

Praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds and may His Peace and Blessings be upon Prophet Muhammad and upon all of his family, companions, and those who follow him.

When the son of Adam dies, all the wealth he possessed at the time of his death becomes part of his estate, whether it is movable wealth like money and furniture or immovable like land and property. This also includes the outcome of efforts he made during his life, which yielded results after his death, such as setting up a fishing net in which a catch is found, blood money (Diya), compensation for injury (Arsh), or a deposit he left with one of his children. [Kindly refer to Mughni Al-Muhtaj, vol.4, pp.7].

There are four rights related to this estate, ordered as follows:

First Right: Preparing the Deceased

This refers to washing, shrouding, and burying the deceased in a manner appropriate for their status. Since preparing the deceased is one of their needs, it should be done as if fulfilling their worldly needs-without extravagance or stinginess, in line with their financial situation.

No other right precedes the right of preparing the deceased except for debts tied directly to the estate, such as a mortgage or Zakat (Alms) that was due before death. The "right tied to the estate" means a debt that is connected to a specific item, such as mortgaged land or goods purchased by a bankrupt buyer.

Imam Al-Nawawi said: "If there is a right attached to the estate, such as Zakat, a loan, mortgaged property, or goods purchased by a bankrupt buyer, it takes precedence over the expenses of preparing the deceased. And Allah the Almighty knows best." [Minhaj Al-Talibin, pp.180].

The reason preparation takes precedence over settling debts is that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) would order that the deceased be shrouded and buried immediately, as seen in the case of the man who died while in a state of ihram after being trampled by his camel. The Prophet (PBUH) said: "Bathe him with water mixed with the leaves of the lote tree and shroud him in his two (pieces of) cloth (Ihram), and do not cover his head for Allah will raise him on the Day of Resurrection Pronouncing Talbiya." [Agreed upon]. He did not inquire whether the deceased had debts, even though he (peace be upon him) would ask about debts when a funeral was brought before him. If the deceased had debts, he would say: "Pray over your companion" (Al-Bukhari. Kindly refer to "Mughni Al-Muhtaj," vol.4/pp.7). Since someone who is bankrupt is allowed to keep something to cover himself, this is even more the case for the deceased. Imam Al-Ramli said: "Because he needs it, just like the bankrupt, and even more so since his means of earning a living has ceased." [Nihayat Al-Muhtaj vol.6/pp.5].

The family of the deceased should be cautious not to spend from the estate on funeral and mourning ceremonies, as this is impermissible. The deceased's wealth becomes the right of the heirs after fulfilling other obligations. It cannot be used without their permission, and if there are minor heirs, it is forbidden to spend their share. Their permission is invalid since they are not legally competent to give it.

Let those who indulge in extravagance in funeral ceremonies from the deceased's wealth fear Allah, for such ceremonies are not part of preparing the deceased. Preparation, as mentioned earlier, is limited to washing, shrouding, and burying. Most of these ceremonies involve extravagance and, at times, showing off.

However, if one of the adult heirs voluntarily donates from their personal wealth within reasonable limits, there is no harm in that.

Second Right: Paying Debts

After the deceased is prepared, their debts are to be paid. These debts are of two types: debts owed to people and debts owed to Allah.

Debts owed to Allah include obligations such as vows, expiations, or obligatory Hajj, while debts owed to people are the well-known financial obligations, such as loans or debts from transactions. The deferred portion of the wife's dowry is also considered a debt that must be paid, a point often overlooked.

If the estate is sufficient to pay off all debts, they should be settled accordingly. If the estate is insufficient, and there are multiple debts, the prevailing opinion in the Shafi'i school is that debts owed to Allah, such as Zakat, expiations, and Hajj, take precedence over debts owed to people. Al-Khatib Al-Shirbini said: "Debts owed to Allah, such as zakat, expiations, and Hajj, take precedence over debts owed to people according to the more correct opinion" [Mughni Al-Muhtaj, vol.4/pp.7]. The Shafi'i scholars base this on the hadith of the Prophet (PBUH): "The debt due to Allah is the one which most deserves to be paid." [Agreed upon].

Third Right: Fulfilling Bequests

If the deceased made a bequest, it must be fulfilled, but only within one-third of the remaining wealth. It is not permissible to exceed this one-third unless the adult heirs give their consent, as their consent would be a donation of a right they own. These rights are fixed and it isn`t permissible they encroach upon each other. The Prophet (PBUH) told Saa’d Ibn Abi Waqqas when he wanted to make a bequest, "One-third, and one-third is a lot." [Agreed upon]. However, there are conditions and restrictions regarding bequests that cannot be elaborated here.

Fourth Right: Distribution of Inheritance

After the previous three rights are fulfilled, the remaining wealth is distributed among the heirs according to their shares prescribed in the noble Quran. However, it is important to note four points here:

1. The heirs' right to the estate is not fully established until the prior rights are fulfilled. If one of the heirs takes anything from the estate, even a small item like a cane the deceased used, they do so wrongfully, as it may belong to a creditor or a person entitled to a bequest.

2. Everything left by the deceased is part of the estate, whether it is of great or little value. No heir may take anything without the knowledge and consent of the other heirs, even after debts have been paid. If there are minor heirs, taking anything is strictly forbidden. Those who do so should beware of Allah's punishment for taking the wealth of an orphan, even if the orphan is their sibling. Allah, The Most Exalted Says (What means): "Indeed, those who consume the wealth of orphans unjustly are only consuming fire into their bellies. And they will be burned in a Blaze" [An-Nisa/10].

3. Some items that are thought to be inheritance may actually belong to the wife, such as furniture she brought as part of her dowry or gifts from her family. These are not part of the inheritance but belong to her, although she allowed her husband and children to use them.

4. Deposits left by the deceased with one of their children are not for that child to keep but are part of the inheritance, as explained earlier, and belong to all the heirs.

We ask Allah the Almighty to grant us a good end, forgive us, and cover our faults in this life and the Hereafter. He is The Guardian of that and Fully Capable of it. Our final call is praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds.

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on compensating the patient in case of medical error on the part of the treating physician?

 
All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The foundational principle is that every mistake issued by a physician that causes harm to another due to his negligence or lack of expertise obligates him to guarantee liability and compensate the harmed party. The Sharia maxim, in this regard, states: "The direct actor is liable."
 
Ibn Qudamah (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "As for if he was skilled but his hand committed an error—such as exceeding the proper limit of incision, cutting in an incorrect site, cutting with an instrument that inflicts excessive pain, or cutting at an unsuitable time—he is liable, because it is destruction (Itlaf) whose liability does not differ between intent and mistake, thus resembling the destruction of property; and because it is a prohibited act, so he guarantees liability for its secondary effects." [Al-Mughni].
 
However, if the physician performed what was necessary in the most complete manner and took all measures of care and caution, but complications occurred that could not be avoided according to specialists, then no liability rests upon him.
 
Shaykh al-Islam Imam al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "The cupper and the circumciser bear no liability if they have not been negligent, and likewise the veterinarian if he bleeds an animal and it perishes." [Rawdat al-Talibin].
 
Al-Khattabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "I know of no disagreement that if the practitioner transgresses and the patient perishes, he is liable. Anyone who undertakes knowledge or practice he does not know is a transgressor; so if perishing arises from his action, he is liable for the blood-money (Diyah) while capital retaliation (Qisas) is dropped from him, because he did not act independently without the patient's permission. And the physician’s offense in the view of the generality of jurists is borne by his agnates ('Aqilah*)."* [Ma'alim al-Sunan].
 
If negligence or transgression is established against the physician, it is necessary to compensate the patient or seek forgiveness from him. And Allah Almighty knows best.

In the Sharia-compliant viewing  at a prospective bride (*al-naẓrah al-sharʿiyyah*), is it permissible for the man to see the woman without a veil (*ḥijāb*)?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is sunnah for the suitor to see the woman he is seeking to marry within the limits the Sharīʿah permits, namely looking at the face and the hands (palms and backs), based on the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him): “Look at her, for it is more likely to bring about harmony between you.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhī.
The suitor may also ask one of the women to look at the woman he is seeking to marry. In that case, she is permitted to see of her what she is normally permitted to see, which is not limited to the face and hands, and she then describes these matters to the suitor. It is narrated on the authority of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) sent Umm Sulaym to look at a girl, and said: “Smell her breath, and look at her heels.” Narrated by Aḥmad in his Musnad.
It is stated in Tuḥfat al-Muḥtāj (Vol.7/p.192): “For one who cannot easily look, or does not wish to look himself, it is sunnah to send someone who is permitted to look at her, to observe her and describe her to him, even regarding what he himself is not permitted to look at. He thereby gains through the sending what he would not gain through looking. Because of the added need for this, it is excepted from the prohibition of a woman describing another woman to a man.”
The permissibility of looking is conditional upon his resolve to marry her once he is able to, his predominant assumption that his proposal will be accepted, and his assumption that the woman is free of marriage and of a waiting period (ʿiddah). Otherwise, looking is forbidden.
Accordingly, it is not permissible for the suitor to look at anything other than the face and hands. He may ask one of his maḥram women, such as his mother or sister, to see the woman unveiled, and the Sharia-compliant viewing (of a prospective bride) must take place in the presence of one of the woman’s maḥrams. And Allah Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible to participate in an Udhiyah?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Regarding the sacrificial offering (Udhiyah), if it is a sheep or a goat, it only avails for one person. However, if it is a cow or a camel, it avails for seven people. It is permissible for the seven participants to have different intentions; for example, some may intend the sacrifice (Udhiyah), some the ’Aqiqah (sacrifice for a newborn), and others may simply intend to obtain meat.
 
It is stated in Hashiyat Qalyubi ‘ala Sharh al-Mahalli (Vol.4/P.256) and in Bushra al-Karim (p. 706):
 
"If one slaughters a camel or a cow on behalf of seven... it is permissible. Likewise, it is permissible if some of them intend their seventh for meat, and others intend their seventh for ’Aqiqah." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on performing ṭawāf on the upper floors of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām, given that these floors are situated above the level of the Ka‘bah, and that the one performing ṭawāf passes by certain barriers, such as pillars and walls, during the ṭawāf?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
There are numerous conditions for the validity of ṭawāf (circumambulation around the Ka‘bah), among them: that the one performing ṭawāf be inside the Masjid (al-Masjid al-Ḥarām) — even if the Masjid has been expanded, so long as the expansion does not extend out into al-ḥill (land outside the sanctuary boundaries). It suffices for the ṭawāf to be performed in the airspace of the Masjid or upon its roof, even if that roof is higher than the Ka‘bah (the House) itself.
Al-Khaṭīb ash-Shirbīnī (raḥimahullāh) said: "It [ṭawāf] is valid upon the roof of the Masjid, even if the roof of the Masjid is higher than the House — just as prayer [is valid] upon Mount Abū Qubays despite its elevation above the House. This is the relied-upon (mu‘tamad) position." [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol.2/P.246]
The validity of the tawaf isn`t affected by the pillars and walls standing between the one performing ṭawāf and the House, since the condition is only that the person performing ṭawāf be within the boundaries of the Masjid and outside the boundaries of the Ka‘bah itself.
Ash-Shirbīnī said: "It [ṭawāf] is valid inside the Masjid, even if it is expanded, and even if a barrier stands between the one circumambulating and the House — such as a water-supply structure (saqāyah) or pillars (sawārī)." [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol. 2/P.246]
Accordingly, ṭawāf performed on the upper floors is valid, and the presence of barriers such as pillars and walls during the ṭawāf does not affect its validity. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

See More