عربي
Home


Articles
الموقع الرئيسي

Articles

The Rights Related to the Estate
Author : Dr. Mufti Sa`eid Farhan
Date Added : 09-10-2024

 

Praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds and may His Peace and Blessings be upon Prophet Muhammad and upon all of his family, companions, and those who follow him.

When the son of Adam dies, all the wealth he possessed at the time of his death becomes part of his estate, whether it is movable wealth like money and furniture or immovable like land and property. This also includes the outcome of efforts he made during his life, which yielded results after his death, such as setting up a fishing net in which a catch is found, blood money (Diya), compensation for injury (Arsh), or a deposit he left with one of his children. [Kindly refer to Mughni Al-Muhtaj, vol.4, pp.7].

There are four rights related to this estate, ordered as follows:

First Right: Preparing the Deceased

This refers to washing, shrouding, and burying the deceased in a manner appropriate for their status. Since preparing the deceased is one of their needs, it should be done as if fulfilling their worldly needs-without extravagance or stinginess, in line with their financial situation.

No other right precedes the right of preparing the deceased except for debts tied directly to the estate, such as a mortgage or Zakat (Alms) that was due before death. The "right tied to the estate" means a debt that is connected to a specific item, such as mortgaged land or goods purchased by a bankrupt buyer.

Imam Al-Nawawi said: "If there is a right attached to the estate, such as Zakat, a loan, mortgaged property, or goods purchased by a bankrupt buyer, it takes precedence over the expenses of preparing the deceased. And Allah the Almighty knows best." [Minhaj Al-Talibin, pp.180].

The reason preparation takes precedence over settling debts is that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) would order that the deceased be shrouded and buried immediately, as seen in the case of the man who died while in a state of ihram after being trampled by his camel. The Prophet (PBUH) said: "Bathe him with water mixed with the leaves of the lote tree and shroud him in his two (pieces of) cloth (Ihram), and do not cover his head for Allah will raise him on the Day of Resurrection Pronouncing Talbiya." [Agreed upon]. He did not inquire whether the deceased had debts, even though he (peace be upon him) would ask about debts when a funeral was brought before him. If the deceased had debts, he would say: "Pray over your companion" (Al-Bukhari. Kindly refer to "Mughni Al-Muhtaj," vol.4/pp.7). Since someone who is bankrupt is allowed to keep something to cover himself, this is even more the case for the deceased. Imam Al-Ramli said: "Because he needs it, just like the bankrupt, and even more so since his means of earning a living has ceased." [Nihayat Al-Muhtaj vol.6/pp.5].

The family of the deceased should be cautious not to spend from the estate on funeral and mourning ceremonies, as this is impermissible. The deceased's wealth becomes the right of the heirs after fulfilling other obligations. It cannot be used without their permission, and if there are minor heirs, it is forbidden to spend their share. Their permission is invalid since they are not legally competent to give it.

Let those who indulge in extravagance in funeral ceremonies from the deceased's wealth fear Allah, for such ceremonies are not part of preparing the deceased. Preparation, as mentioned earlier, is limited to washing, shrouding, and burying. Most of these ceremonies involve extravagance and, at times, showing off.

However, if one of the adult heirs voluntarily donates from their personal wealth within reasonable limits, there is no harm in that.

Second Right: Paying Debts

After the deceased is prepared, their debts are to be paid. These debts are of two types: debts owed to people and debts owed to Allah.

Debts owed to Allah include obligations such as vows, expiations, or obligatory Hajj, while debts owed to people are the well-known financial obligations, such as loans or debts from transactions. The deferred portion of the wife's dowry is also considered a debt that must be paid, a point often overlooked.

If the estate is sufficient to pay off all debts, they should be settled accordingly. If the estate is insufficient, and there are multiple debts, the prevailing opinion in the Shafi'i school is that debts owed to Allah, such as Zakat, expiations, and Hajj, take precedence over debts owed to people. Al-Khatib Al-Shirbini said: "Debts owed to Allah, such as zakat, expiations, and Hajj, take precedence over debts owed to people according to the more correct opinion" [Mughni Al-Muhtaj, vol.4/pp.7]. The Shafi'i scholars base this on the hadith of the Prophet (PBUH): "The debt due to Allah is the one which most deserves to be paid." [Agreed upon].

Third Right: Fulfilling Bequests

If the deceased made a bequest, it must be fulfilled, but only within one-third of the remaining wealth. It is not permissible to exceed this one-third unless the adult heirs give their consent, as their consent would be a donation of a right they own. These rights are fixed and it isn`t permissible they encroach upon each other. The Prophet (PBUH) told Saa’d Ibn Abi Waqqas when he wanted to make a bequest, "One-third, and one-third is a lot." [Agreed upon]. However, there are conditions and restrictions regarding bequests that cannot be elaborated here.

Fourth Right: Distribution of Inheritance

After the previous three rights are fulfilled, the remaining wealth is distributed among the heirs according to their shares prescribed in the noble Quran. However, it is important to note four points here:

1. The heirs' right to the estate is not fully established until the prior rights are fulfilled. If one of the heirs takes anything from the estate, even a small item like a cane the deceased used, they do so wrongfully, as it may belong to a creditor or a person entitled to a bequest.

2. Everything left by the deceased is part of the estate, whether it is of great or little value. No heir may take anything without the knowledge and consent of the other heirs, even after debts have been paid. If there are minor heirs, taking anything is strictly forbidden. Those who do so should beware of Allah's punishment for taking the wealth of an orphan, even if the orphan is their sibling. Allah, The Most Exalted Says (What means): "Indeed, those who consume the wealth of orphans unjustly are only consuming fire into their bellies. And they will be burned in a Blaze" [An-Nisa/10].

3. Some items that are thought to be inheritance may actually belong to the wife, such as furniture she brought as part of her dowry or gifts from her family. These are not part of the inheritance but belong to her, although she allowed her husband and children to use them.

4. Deposits left by the deceased with one of their children are not for that child to keep but are part of the inheritance, as explained earlier, and belong to all the heirs.

We ask Allah the Almighty to grant us a good end, forgive us, and cover our faults in this life and the Hereafter. He is The Guardian of that and Fully Capable of it. Our final call is praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds.

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What are the conditions for a valid Udhiyah?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
First: The age of the animal must meet the Sharia requirements. These requirements vary depending on the type of sacrifice:
 
Camels: Must have completed five years and entered their sixth.
 
Cows: Must have completed two years and entered their third.
 
Goats: Must have completed two years and entered their third. As for Sheep, they must have completed one year and entered their second.
 
Some scholars have permitted goats that have completed one year and entered their second.
 
The Hanafi school, along with an opinion in the Maliki school, permits sacrificing sheep that are at least six months old, provided they are healthy and physically substantial. According to the Shafi’i school, it is permissible if the sheep sheds its front teeth (ajdha') before reaching one year [Al-Iqna’, by Al-Shirbini (Vol.2/P.588)].
 
Second: Soundness and freedom from defects. The animal must be free from any defect that causes a decrease in its meat or market value. This is based on the hadith narrated by Al-Bara' bin 'Azib, that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
 
"Four [defects] are not permissible in sacrifices: A one-eyed animal whose blindness is evident, a sick animal whose illness is evident, a lame animal whose lameness is evident, and an emaciated animal that has no marrow in its bones." [Reported by Abu Dawood and Al-Tirmidhi, who graded it as authentic].
 
These defects are detailed as follows:
 
Evident Lameness: It is not permissible to sacrifice a lame animal if the lameness is severe enough to prevent it from walking to the pasture or seeking food, as this leads to a decrease in its meat. However, slight lameness that does not hinder its grazing is overlooked.
 
Evident Blindness (One-eyed): It is not permissible to sacrifice a sheep, cow, or camel that has a white film over its eye blocking light, or one that has lost an eye entirely. Weak vision that does not affect its ability to eat does not prevent the sacrifice from being valid.
 
Evident Illness: An animal with a clear sickness that prevents it from eating or moving is not valid. This includes severe mange (Jarab) that spoils the meat.
 
Extreme Emaciation: An animal so thin that there is no marrow left in its bones is invalid. The standard for emaciation that invalidates the sacrifice is that which spoils the quality of the meat to the point that people would find it undesirable even in times of plenty.
 
Additional Considerations:
These are the defects mentioned in the Prophetic tradition, and any defect that causes emaciation or reduces the meat or value is compared to them by analogy. This includes animals that are mentally unstable (diseased), those with mange, or those with a missing ear. In contrast, a slit or pierced ear does not affect the validity of the sacrifice. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for a menstruating woman to recite the Quran from the computer without actually touching the Quran?

It is not permissible for a woman in her menstrual period, or in postpartum to recite the Quran, even by heart, or without actually touching the Quran itself. Recitation itself is what is prohibited on her regardless of how it is done. However, it is permissible for her to surf through the Quran by her eyes, or to recall it in her head without uttering the words. There is no harm for her to look at the Quranic verses on the computer without touching it, or to utter the words as this is called looking not reciting or reading.

My brother works in a conventional bank and gave me one of the gifts distributed to bank employees — what is the ruling on accepting it?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
There is no objection to accepting such gifts, because the physical gift itself does not carry any inherent prohibition — unlike stolen property. Sin does not transfer or extend to the one who receives the gift, for Allah the Almighty says {what means}: "And no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another." [Al-Anʿām/164]
The evidence for this is that the Prophet ﷺ himself ate from the food of the Jews, conducted transactions with them, and purchased from them — and it is well known that their wealth was intermingled with ribā. Similarly, the wealth of conventional ribā-based banks is a mixture of the lawful and the unlawful.
Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "It is not forbidden to transact with one whose wealth is predominantly unlawful, nor to eat from it — as al-Nawawī affirmed in al-Majmūʿ." [Tuḥfat al-Muḥtāj, Vol. 9/P.389] And Allah the Almighty knows best.

My father has debts and asked me to repay them years ago, and I promised him I would do so upon his death — is it permissible for me to go back on my promise given that I am unable to repay them, especially since he refuses to contribute to repayment on the grounds that the debt has become my responsibility by virtue of my promise?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The established principle is that a father's debt is to be repaid from his own wealth, if he possesses sufficient means. As for the promise made by the son to repay it on his father's behalf, fulfilling such a promise is strongly recommended, and breaking it is considerably disliked. Shaykh al-Islām Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "Fulfilling a promise is emphatically recommended, and breaking it is severely disliked. The evidences for this from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah are well known." [Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn,Vol. 2/P.278] Shaykh al-Islām Imām Zakariyyā al-Anṣārī, may Allah have mercy upon him, further states: "The reason fulfilling a promise is not obligatory and breaking it is not forbidden is that a promise is in the nature of a gift, and a gift does not become binding except upon receipt." [Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib,Vol. 2/P.487]
Given that the son does not possess the financial means to fulfil his promise to his father, breaking this promise falls beyond his capacity — and Allah does not burden a soul beyond what it can bear. Since the father himself possesses sufficient wealth to settle his own debt, repayment must be made from his own funds. Should he pass away before doing so, the debt is to be settled from his estate. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More