Articles

The Higher Objectives of Sharia (Maqasid) are a Shield Protecting Islamic Banking
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 02-10-2024

Considering the Higher Objectives of Sharia (Maqasid) as a Safeguard for Islamic Banking

 

All perfect praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds. May His peace and blessings be upon Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

Islamic banking is an integral part of the contemporary Islamic economic system, encompassing everything related to the transactions of Islamic banks and financial institutions, including financing, investment, and services.

The various Islamic financial institutions represent an effort to institutionalize a significant part of the Islamic financial system and codify it into rulings and fatwas that reflect the practical reality connecting these institutions with others or with individuals in society through financing and investment mechanisms, while also considering the social and ethical aspects related to their nature of work.

The emergence of these Islamic financial institutions is associated with noble goals, foremost among them being the establishment of an Islamic alternative to the prevailing traditional (usurious) system.

The experience of Islamic banking is a human endeavor, as it is an attempt to apply financing, investment, and service operations from an Islamic perspective. This makes it susceptible to criticism and evaluation and serves as a field for innovation and change. Annual conferences and periodic seminars are held to study this situation, identify weaknesses and strengths, improve standards, and initiate change.

It goes without saying that directing criticism toward the application or describing it as weak does not mean criticizing or undermining the general principles in Islamic Law of the case under consideration. The application of principles and general rules is a matter of conjecture, a human effort that may contain errors and correctness and varies from one jurist to another depending on differing understandings. However, the principles and general rules themselves are definitive matters that are unanimously agreed upon.

These principles and general rules, which we consider the basis for applying operations and services in Islamic banking, relate to the objectives of Sharia, the prohibition of evasive legal devices, and the consideration of the outcomes of rulings.

Considering the objectives of Sharia serves as a protective barrier for Islamic banking against the pitfalls of fatwas, the errors of justification, the exaggeration in religious matters, and the transformation of jurisprudence from innovative and renewal-oriented to merely patching up issues.

Moreover, consideration of the objectives of Sharia contributes to regulating evidence, meaning it monitors the processes of interpretation, inference, analogy, and Ijtihad through its various channels. [Objectives of Sharia and Economic and Financial Transactions, Dr. Abdul Latif Al-Sabbagh, presented at the Wednesday Dialogue at the Islamic Economics Research Center on 16-2-1420 AH, p. 13].

If we aim to correct the trajectory of Islamic banking, enhance its management, and justify its existence as a true alternative to usurious institutions that satisfy individuals' needs and contribute to the preservation of the nation's system and strength, this cannot be achieved through mere reactionary measures that monitor usurious banking and attempt to imitate it under an Islamic guise. Instead, it requires a collective effort to develop an Islamic economic system that originates from the essence of Islam, which is founded on the consideration of the objectives of Sharia.

The prominent scholar Muhammad Al-Tahir Ibn Ashour (d. 1973) referred to this in his works: "It has been established among our scholars that the preservation of wealth is one of the foundational rules of Sharia that fall under the category of necessity. Their discussions indicate that the system for the growth of wealth and methods of its circulation constitute the majority of issues related to needs, such as sales, leasing, and Salam (Forward buying) contracts. I have mentioned in the previous section that the most important objective is the preservation of the nation’s wealth and its provision for the nation. Since the nation's wealth is collective in nature, its preservation occurs through regulating the methods of its overall management and the means of preserving individuals' wealth, as the preservation of the collective depends on preserving its components. Most of the financial legislation is related to the preservation of individuals' wealth, which ultimately leads to the preservation of the nation’s wealth, as the benefits of private wealth return to the public benefit of the nation's wealth" [Objectives of Islamic Legislation, Muhammad Al-Tahir Ibn Ashour, Dar Al-Kitab Al-Misri, Cairo, Dar Al-Kitab Al-Lubnani, Beirut, introduction by Hatim Bou Sema, 1st ed., 2011, pp. 297-298].

We notice in the words of this eminent juristic scholar a remarkable connection between the general and the specific, between objectives and means, and between the necessary and the need-based. The preservation of the nation's wealth is a necessary general objective, for which specific need-based means have been established, including the system for the growth of wealth, which encompasses all Sharia investment operations, means of circulation, and trading methods.

Furthermore, one of the necessary means to maintain the objective of preserving the nation’s wealth is regulating the management methods of its overall wealth, which includes official government management of funds, and regulating the preservation of individuals' wealth and the means of managing it, which includes private management of funds and banks.

It is also important to emphasize the significance of grounding Islamic banking fatwas in the general objectives of Sharia and considering the outcomes when issuing financial fatwas. In this regard, Imam Al-Shatibi — may Allah have mercy on him — stated: "Considering the outcomes of actions is a Sharia intended goal. Actions, whether in accordance with or in opposition to the Sharia, must be assessed based on what those actions will lead to." [Al-Muwafaqat Fi Usul Al-Shari'ah by Imam Abu Ishaq Al-Shatibi, with commentary by Sheikh Abdullah Daraz, Dar Al-Hadith, Cairo, 2006, vol. 4, pp. 431-432].

In another context, Imam Al-Shatibi said: "Anyone who seeks in the duties of Sharia something other than what it was intended for has contradicted Sharia, and anyone who contradicts it has invalidated their actions." [Al-Muwafaqat Fi Usul Al-Shari'ah by Imam Al-Shatibi, vol. 2, pp. 495].

Thus, it is a comprehensive reform project aimed at rectifying the course of Islamic banking, striving to develop it, and enabling it to compete in a market lacking the meanings of the lofty objectives of Sharia, which are based on achieving benefits and warding off harm. This project relies on four foundational principles:

1. Prohibition of oppression.

2. Prohibition of usury/Riba.

3. Prohibition of uncertainty/Gharar.

4. Consideration of objectives and benefits. [These principles were mentioned by Imam Ibn Al-Arabi Al-Maliki (d. 543 AH) in his interpretation of the rulings of the Quran, edited by Ali Muhammad Al-Bajawi, Dar Iḥya Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, Lebanon, 1st ed., vol. 1, pp. 110].

When all aspects related to Islamic banking — administrative, technical, legal, and Islamic — adhere to the aforementioned four principles, there will be no oppression, no usury, no uncertainty, and no violation of the requirements of the Sharia objectives. At that point, we will have placed our foot on the path to genuine reform that leads to change, innovation, and development in various aspects of Islamic banking. There is no doubt that this project requires specialized and skilled scholars, sincere intentions, and high aspirations.

And indeed, Allah is The Granter of success.

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on giving Zakat al-Fitr in cash?

The default ruling is that Zakat al-Fitr should be given as the staple food of the land. In Jordan, for example, the staple food is wheat or rice, and the amount of Zakat al-Fitr is 2,500 grams per person. It is easy to give this amount of rice to the poor and needy, and this is the correct ruling according to all Islamic schools of thought.
However, Hanafi scholars have permitted giving Zakat al-Fitr as monetary value, considering it more beneficial for the poor and easier for the giver.

What are the conditions for a valid Udhiyah?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
First: The age of the animal must meet the Sharia requirements. These requirements vary depending on the type of sacrifice:
 
Camels: Must have completed five years and entered their sixth.
 
Cows: Must have completed two years and entered their third.
 
Goats: Must have completed two years and entered their third. As for Sheep, they must have completed one year and entered their second.
 
Some scholars have permitted goats that have completed one year and entered their second.
 
The Hanafi school, along with an opinion in the Maliki school, permits sacrificing sheep that are at least six months old, provided they are healthy and physically substantial. According to the Shafi’i school, it is permissible if the sheep sheds its front teeth (ajdha') before reaching one year [Al-Iqna’, by Al-Shirbini (Vol.2/P.588)].
 
Second: Soundness and freedom from defects. The animal must be free from any defect that causes a decrease in its meat or market value. This is based on the hadith narrated by Al-Bara' bin 'Azib, that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
 
"Four [defects] are not permissible in sacrifices: A one-eyed animal whose blindness is evident, a sick animal whose illness is evident, a lame animal whose lameness is evident, and an emaciated animal that has no marrow in its bones." [Reported by Abu Dawood and Al-Tirmidhi, who graded it as authentic].
 
These defects are detailed as follows:
 
Evident Lameness: It is not permissible to sacrifice a lame animal if the lameness is severe enough to prevent it from walking to the pasture or seeking food, as this leads to a decrease in its meat. However, slight lameness that does not hinder its grazing is overlooked.
 
Evident Blindness (One-eyed): It is not permissible to sacrifice a sheep, cow, or camel that has a white film over its eye blocking light, or one that has lost an eye entirely. Weak vision that does not affect its ability to eat does not prevent the sacrifice from being valid.
 
Evident Illness: An animal with a clear sickness that prevents it from eating or moving is not valid. This includes severe mange (Jarab) that spoils the meat.
 
Extreme Emaciation: An animal so thin that there is no marrow left in its bones is invalid. The standard for emaciation that invalidates the sacrifice is that which spoils the quality of the meat to the point that people would find it undesirable even in times of plenty.
 
Additional Considerations:
These are the defects mentioned in the Prophetic tradition, and any defect that causes emaciation or reduces the meat or value is compared to them by analogy. This includes animals that are mentally unstable (diseased), those with mange, or those with a missing ear. In contrast, a slit or pierced ear does not affect the validity of the sacrifice. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on men wearing rings (those made of silver and of other metals, such as iron), and are there conditions for men wearing rings?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is sunnah for men to wear a silver ring on the right hand, following the practice of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). It is reported in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, on the authority of Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him), that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) took a silver ring and had “Muḥammad Rasūl Allāh” engraved on it. He said: “I have taken a ring of silver and had ‘Muḥammad Rasūl Allāh’ engraved on it, so let no one engrave the like of its engraving.”
It is a condition that the silver ring not exceed the size customary in the local norm (ʿurf). If it does, that is extravagance (isrāf). A ring made of a metal other than silver, such as iron or copper, is permissible to wear without disapproval (karāhah), except gold, which is forbidden (ḥarām) for a man to wear.
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.1/p.586): “It is permissible, without disapproval, to wear a ring of iron or lead. It is sunnah for a man to wear a silver ring on the little finger of his right or left hand. Wearing it on the right is better, and it is permissible on the left, and on both together.”
It is also stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.2/p.97): “It is lawful for him, that is, the man, and likewise the khunthā (person of indeterminate sex), indeed all the more so, to wear a ring of silver, by consensus (ijmāʿ), because the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) took a ring of silver, narrated by the two Shaykhs (al-Bukhārī and Muslim). Wearing it is in fact sunnah, whether on the right or the left, though the right is better according to the sound position, as stated in the chapter on clothing in al-Rawḍah… The Shāfiʿī jurists did not specify the permitted size of the ring, and they probably relied on custom (ʿurf), that is, the custom of that country and the habit of people of his standing in it. Whatever exceeds that is extravagance, as they said regarding a woman’s anklet. This is the reliable position (al-muʿtamad).” And Allah Almighty knows best.

A person who has recently embraced Islam is afraid of undergoing circumcision (khitān) — what should he do?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
If this person would be harmed by undergoing circumcision, based on the assessment of a trustworthy physician, then he is not obligated to undergo it. However, if the matter is simply a fear of the procedure itself, then it may be postponed until he feels at ease and settled about it, provided this does not lead him to become averse to Islam — while still taking care to remove any impurity from the concealed area [beneath the foreskin]. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.