Articles

The Higher Objectives of Sharia (Maqasid) are a Shield Protecting Islamic Banking
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 02-10-2024

Considering the Higher Objectives of Sharia (Maqasid) as a Safeguard for Islamic Banking

 

All perfect praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds. May His peace and blessings be upon Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

Islamic banking is an integral part of the contemporary Islamic economic system, encompassing everything related to the transactions of Islamic banks and financial institutions, including financing, investment, and services.

The various Islamic financial institutions represent an effort to institutionalize a significant part of the Islamic financial system and codify it into rulings and fatwas that reflect the practical reality connecting these institutions with others or with individuals in society through financing and investment mechanisms, while also considering the social and ethical aspects related to their nature of work.

The emergence of these Islamic financial institutions is associated with noble goals, foremost among them being the establishment of an Islamic alternative to the prevailing traditional (usurious) system.

The experience of Islamic banking is a human endeavor, as it is an attempt to apply financing, investment, and service operations from an Islamic perspective. This makes it susceptible to criticism and evaluation and serves as a field for innovation and change. Annual conferences and periodic seminars are held to study this situation, identify weaknesses and strengths, improve standards, and initiate change.

It goes without saying that directing criticism toward the application or describing it as weak does not mean criticizing or undermining the general principles in Islamic Law of the case under consideration. The application of principles and general rules is a matter of conjecture, a human effort that may contain errors and correctness and varies from one jurist to another depending on differing understandings. However, the principles and general rules themselves are definitive matters that are unanimously agreed upon.

These principles and general rules, which we consider the basis for applying operations and services in Islamic banking, relate to the objectives of Sharia, the prohibition of evasive legal devices, and the consideration of the outcomes of rulings.

Considering the objectives of Sharia serves as a protective barrier for Islamic banking against the pitfalls of fatwas, the errors of justification, the exaggeration in religious matters, and the transformation of jurisprudence from innovative and renewal-oriented to merely patching up issues.

Moreover, consideration of the objectives of Sharia contributes to regulating evidence, meaning it monitors the processes of interpretation, inference, analogy, and Ijtihad through its various channels. [Objectives of Sharia and Economic and Financial Transactions, Dr. Abdul Latif Al-Sabbagh, presented at the Wednesday Dialogue at the Islamic Economics Research Center on 16-2-1420 AH, p. 13].

If we aim to correct the trajectory of Islamic banking, enhance its management, and justify its existence as a true alternative to usurious institutions that satisfy individuals' needs and contribute to the preservation of the nation's system and strength, this cannot be achieved through mere reactionary measures that monitor usurious banking and attempt to imitate it under an Islamic guise. Instead, it requires a collective effort to develop an Islamic economic system that originates from the essence of Islam, which is founded on the consideration of the objectives of Sharia.

The prominent scholar Muhammad Al-Tahir Ibn Ashour (d. 1973) referred to this in his works: "It has been established among our scholars that the preservation of wealth is one of the foundational rules of Sharia that fall under the category of necessity. Their discussions indicate that the system for the growth of wealth and methods of its circulation constitute the majority of issues related to needs, such as sales, leasing, and Salam (Forward buying) contracts. I have mentioned in the previous section that the most important objective is the preservation of the nation’s wealth and its provision for the nation. Since the nation's wealth is collective in nature, its preservation occurs through regulating the methods of its overall management and the means of preserving individuals' wealth, as the preservation of the collective depends on preserving its components. Most of the financial legislation is related to the preservation of individuals' wealth, which ultimately leads to the preservation of the nation’s wealth, as the benefits of private wealth return to the public benefit of the nation's wealth" [Objectives of Islamic Legislation, Muhammad Al-Tahir Ibn Ashour, Dar Al-Kitab Al-Misri, Cairo, Dar Al-Kitab Al-Lubnani, Beirut, introduction by Hatim Bou Sema, 1st ed., 2011, pp. 297-298].

We notice in the words of this eminent juristic scholar a remarkable connection between the general and the specific, between objectives and means, and between the necessary and the need-based. The preservation of the nation's wealth is a necessary general objective, for which specific need-based means have been established, including the system for the growth of wealth, which encompasses all Sharia investment operations, means of circulation, and trading methods.

Furthermore, one of the necessary means to maintain the objective of preserving the nation’s wealth is regulating the management methods of its overall wealth, which includes official government management of funds, and regulating the preservation of individuals' wealth and the means of managing it, which includes private management of funds and banks.

It is also important to emphasize the significance of grounding Islamic banking fatwas in the general objectives of Sharia and considering the outcomes when issuing financial fatwas. In this regard, Imam Al-Shatibi — may Allah have mercy on him — stated: "Considering the outcomes of actions is a Sharia intended goal. Actions, whether in accordance with or in opposition to the Sharia, must be assessed based on what those actions will lead to." [Al-Muwafaqat Fi Usul Al-Shari'ah by Imam Abu Ishaq Al-Shatibi, with commentary by Sheikh Abdullah Daraz, Dar Al-Hadith, Cairo, 2006, vol. 4, pp. 431-432].

In another context, Imam Al-Shatibi said: "Anyone who seeks in the duties of Sharia something other than what it was intended for has contradicted Sharia, and anyone who contradicts it has invalidated their actions." [Al-Muwafaqat Fi Usul Al-Shari'ah by Imam Al-Shatibi, vol. 2, pp. 495].

Thus, it is a comprehensive reform project aimed at rectifying the course of Islamic banking, striving to develop it, and enabling it to compete in a market lacking the meanings of the lofty objectives of Sharia, which are based on achieving benefits and warding off harm. This project relies on four foundational principles:

1. Prohibition of oppression.

2. Prohibition of usury/Riba.

3. Prohibition of uncertainty/Gharar.

4. Consideration of objectives and benefits. [These principles were mentioned by Imam Ibn Al-Arabi Al-Maliki (d. 543 AH) in his interpretation of the rulings of the Quran, edited by Ali Muhammad Al-Bajawi, Dar Iḥya Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, Lebanon, 1st ed., vol. 1, pp. 110].

When all aspects related to Islamic banking — administrative, technical, legal, and Islamic — adhere to the aforementioned four principles, there will be no oppression, no usury, no uncertainty, and no violation of the requirements of the Sharia objectives. At that point, we will have placed our foot on the path to genuine reform that leads to change, innovation, and development in various aspects of Islamic banking. There is no doubt that this project requires specialized and skilled scholars, sincere intentions, and high aspirations.

And indeed, Allah is The Granter of success.

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on bypassing a nearby mosque for a distant one?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
If a distant mosque has a larger congregation (Jama‘ah) while the congregation in the nearby mosque is smaller, and the congregation in the nearby mosque is not adversely affected by the worshiper's absence, then it is better for him to pray in the distant mosque with the larger congregation. However, if the congregation in the nearby mosque would be affected by his absence—such as if he is its Imam, or if his presence encourages others to attend—then praying in the nearby mosque is better. This ensures that the congregation is established in two different locations within the community. This is based on the saying of the Prophet ﷺ: 'A man's prayer offered with another man is purer than his prayer which he offers alone, and his prayer with two men is purer than his prayer with one and if they are more (in number), it is more beloved to Allah, the Mighty the Majestic' (Narrated by Ahmad, Abu Dawood, and An-Nasa'i). And Allah the Exalted knows best.

What is the wisdom behind legislating the Udhiyah?

The Muslim must know that through the Uḍḥiyah, he complies with the command of Allah, the Exalted, and performs a worship that brings him closer to Allah and distances him from the Fire.
 
The Uḍḥiyah holds profound wisdoms and noble meanings, including:
 
1-Reviving the Sunnah of Abraham, peace be upon him: He complied with Allah's command when He ordered him to slaughter his son Ishmael. Abraham, peace be upon him, succeeded in the test, and when he was about to slaughter his son, Allah sent down a ram to ransom Ishmael and commanded him to slaughter it instead. Allah, the Exalted, says {what means]: "And when he reached with him [the age of] exertion, he said, 'O my son, indeed I have seen in a dream that I [must] sacrifice you, so see what you think.' He said, 'O my father, do as you are commanded. You will find me, if Allah wills, of the steadfast.' And when they had both submitted and he put him down upon his forehead, We called to him, 'O Abraham, You have fulfilled the vision.' Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good. Indeed, this was the clear trial. And We ransomed him with a great sacrifice." [Al-Ṣāffāt/102-107]. Thus, the sacrificial offering became an enduring Sunnah until the Day of Judgment, and Muslims offer their wealth as sacrifices, drawing closer to Allah, the Exalted, reviving this great Sunnah.
 
2-Providing abundance for people on Eid day and the Days of Tashrīq: Among the wisdoms of the Uḍḥiyah is that the Muslim provides generously for his family, neighbors, relatives, and the poor during these days. The Muslim is encouraged to eat from his sacrifice, give charity from it to the poor, and gift from it to his wealthy neighbors. Thus, goodness spreads throughout the entire community. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "The Days of Tashrīq are days of eating and drinking." (Narrated by Muslim). Allah, the Exalted, says {what means}: "And the camels and cattle We have appointed for you as among the symbols of Allah; for you therein is good." [Al-Ḥajj/36]. This good includes the good of both this world and the Hereafter.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on compensating the patient in case of medical error on the part of the treating physician?

 
All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The foundational principle is that every mistake issued by a physician that causes harm to another due to his negligence or lack of expertise obligates him to guarantee liability and compensate the harmed party. The Sharia maxim, in this regard, states: "The direct actor is liable."
 
Ibn Qudamah (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "As for if he was skilled but his hand committed an error—such as exceeding the proper limit of incision, cutting in an incorrect site, cutting with an instrument that inflicts excessive pain, or cutting at an unsuitable time—he is liable, because it is destruction (Itlaf) whose liability does not differ between intent and mistake, thus resembling the destruction of property; and because it is a prohibited act, so he guarantees liability for its secondary effects." [Al-Mughni].
 
However, if the physician performed what was necessary in the most complete manner and took all measures of care and caution, but complications occurred that could not be avoided according to specialists, then no liability rests upon him.
 
Shaykh al-Islam Imam al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "The cupper and the circumciser bear no liability if they have not been negligent, and likewise the veterinarian if he bleeds an animal and it perishes." [Rawdat al-Talibin].
 
Al-Khattabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "I know of no disagreement that if the practitioner transgresses and the patient perishes, he is liable. Anyone who undertakes knowledge or practice he does not know is a transgressor; so if perishing arises from his action, he is liable for the blood-money (Diyah) while capital retaliation (Qisas) is dropped from him, because he did not act independently without the patient's permission. And the physician’s offense in the view of the generality of jurists is borne by his agnates ('Aqilah*)."* [Ma'alim al-Sunan].
 
If negligence or transgression is established against the physician, it is necessary to compensate the patient or seek forgiveness from him. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, and is it permissible to slaughter the ewe if one knows it is pregnant?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a person slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, the fetus becomes lawful (ḥalāl) by virtue of its mother's slaughter (tabaʿan li-ummihā).
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.6/P.158): "A fetus found dead [after the mother's slaughter], or found alive but in a state resembling that of a slaughtered animal [i.e., dying shortly after], becomes lawful — whether or not it had grown fur — provided it is found in the womb of a mother that was lawfully slaughtered, whether her slaughter was by cutting the throat, or by an arrow or hunting dog sent after her. This is based on the ḥadīth: 'The slaughtering of the fetus is [effected by] the slaughtering of its mother' [narrated by al-Tirmidhī, who graded it ḥasan, and by Ibn Ḥibbān, who graded it ṣaḥīḥ] — meaning that the slaughter which rendered the mother lawful renders the fetus lawful as well, by virtue of following her; and because the fetus is one of her constituent parts, and her slaughter renders lawful all of her parts."
This ruling differs, however, from the case of one who knows from the outset that the ewe is pregnant [and intends to sacrifice her specifically as the udḥiyah while pregnant] — in which case, according to the Shāfi'ī school, she does not fulfill the requirement of a valid sacrifice.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Bujayrimī 'alā al-Khaṭīb (Vol.4/P.335): "A pregnant animal does not fulfill the requirement [of a valid sacrifice], and this is the authoritative position (al-mu'tamad), because pregnancy diminishes the quality of the meat. As for why such an animal is nevertheless counted as complete [i.e., fully valid] in matters of zakāh, that is because the intent there is reproduction (nasl), not the quality of the meat.". And Allah, the Most High, knows best.