Articles

The Ruling of Islam on Drugs
Author : Dr Noah Ali Salman
Date Added : 28-08-2024

Praise be to Allah, the Lord of all worlds, and peace and blessings be upon the guiding bringer of good tidings, our master Muhammad, and upon his family, his companions, and those who follow him with excellence until the Day of Judgment. To proceed:

Scholars have explained that Islamic law was established to preserve the five necessities of life, which form the material and spiritual existence of a human being: religion, life, progeny, intellect, and wealth.

This preservation, as brought by the Sharia, operates on two levels: the level of protection and the level of care.

As for the level of protection, it focuses on prevention and keeping away harm and harmful elements. The level of care, on the other hand, is concerned with striving to achieve the desired goal, which is the absolute worship of Allah the Almighty.

The intellect is arguably the most important of these objectives; for religion without intellect is mere rituals and heresies, the self without intellect is chaotic movement, lineage without intellect is aimless procreation, and wealth without intellect leads to corruption and destruction.

Therefore, the Shariah has made the intellect the basis for legal capacity; whoever loses the blessing of intellect is exempted from accountability, as they are neither fit for it nor capable of fulfilling it.

Anyone who observes the effects of drugs of all kinds and their various consequences will see that they pose a clear danger, an outright assault, and a decisive threat to these five necessities. A drug user does not care about the rulings of their religion, nor do they pay attention to their duty towards their Creator. They neither strive to obey Him nor fear disobeying Him, which results in the corruption of their faith and the loss of their hereafter.

Drugs obliterate the mind and conflict with the religion, which commands the prohibition of anything harmful to the individual and society. Scholars have discovered, and continue to discover, more about the physical ailments caused by drugs, whether on the brain, the heart, or other parts of the human body.

As for the harm to the mind, in addition to its impairment, doctors and specialists have extensively detailed the dangers of addiction to the human mind and its physiological structure. Regarding the harm to progeny, drug use weakens sexual ability, damages embryos, and undermines honor.

A drug user, in their obsession with consuming drugs, is ingesting a poison that is universally agreed upon by rational individuals, scholars, and doctors as being destructive to the body, damaging to the soul, and causing a slow death. When bodies are destroyed and weakened, and the balance of truth and goodness is disrupted, families, which are the natural incubators for the upbringing and strength of progeny, become corrupted.

A drug user loses their human integrity and dignity, becoming a puppet in the hands of death merchants, chasing after illusions and, ultimately, a grim demise. They lack sound thinking, necessary balance, and the ability to make wise choices, which rational individuals strive for. They sell themselves and squander their money, desperately seeking their own destruction in the most horrific and dreadful manner.

Given the aforementioned points—though just a small portion of the broader depiction of the condition of those deceived and ruined by drugs—the ruling on them is definitive prohibition, as unanimously agreed by the scholars. This is due to the confirmed negative effects, the undeniable harm, and the established risks they pose to individuals and societies. Among the evidence relied upon by scholars to declare drugs as forbidden are:

First: Allah says {what means}: "O you who have believed, indeed, intoxicants, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone alters [to other than Allah], and divining arrows are but defilement from the work of Satan, so avoid it that you may be successful." (Al-Ma'idah, 90). Drugs share the same reason for prohibition as alcohol, which is intoxication by impairing the mind and covering the grace of Allah upon the person; thus, they fall under the same ruling.

Second: Allah says {what means}: "He allows them the good things and forbids them the evil." (Al-A'raf, 157). It is inconceivable for a rational person to classify drugs as anything other than evils.

Third: Allah says {what means}: "And do not throw yourselves into destruction." (Al-Baqarah, 195). One of the fundamental principles in Islam is to avoid anything that is harmful to human health. The use of drugs leads to physical, psychological, and social harm.

Fourth: From Umm Salama (may Allah be pleased with her), she said: "The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) prohibited every intoxicant and every drug that causes numbness." (Reported by Abu Dawood). Drugs, in their various forms, cause numbness and are destructive to the mind and body.

Fifth: Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "Allah does not prohibit wine because of its name, but He prohibits it because of its consequences. Therefore, any drink that has the same harmful consequences as wine is also forbidden, just like the prohibition of wine." (Reported by Al-Daraqutni).

As for the statements from scholars regarding the prohibition of drugs, some of them are:

First: It is mentioned in "Hashiyat Ibn Abidin" (Vol.3/P.239) that: "The scholars of both the Shafi'i and Hanafi schools agreed that a divorce pronounced by someone who has lost his mind due to consuming hashish is valid, based on their fatwa on its prohibition."

Second: It is also mentioned in the same source (Vol.6/P.457) that: "The consumption of narcotics such as hashish, cannabis, and opium is prohibited because they corrupt the mind and distract from the remembrance of Allah and prayer. There are reports of people who, after using these substances, suffered from mental disturbances and even death. The scholar who claimed that hashish was permissible is considered a heretic and innovator; Nujum al-Din al-Zahidi even stated that such a person could be considered an infidel and permissible to kill."

Third: It is mentioned in "Mughni al-Muhtaj" (4/187): "The two Shaykhs mentioned in the section on foods from Al-Ruyani that consuming hashish is forbidden. Al-Ghazali said in 'Al-Qawa'id' that the consumer of hashish should be punished and admonished. Ibn Taymiyyah stated that hashish first appeared in the late sixth century of the Hijra, during the rise of the Mongol Empire, and it is considered one of the greatest evils, even worse than alcohol in some respects. This is because it produces intoxication and pleasure similar to alcohol, and it is more difficult to quit than alcohol."

Fourth: Ibn Taymiyyah said: "Hashish, which is made from grape leaves, is also forbidden. Its consumer should be punished in the same way as a drinker of alcohol. It is even worse than alcohol because it corrupts the mind and temperament, leading to behaviors such as effeminacy and other forms of moral corruption. Alcohol, on the other hand, leads to disputes and fighting. Both prevent remembrance of Allah and prayer. Hashish falls under the prohibition of alcohol and intoxication, whether by name or meaning." ("Al-Siyasah al-Shar'iyyah" / p. 108).

Fifth: Imam al-San'ani said: "It is forbidden to use anything that intoxicates, even if it is not a drink, such as hashish." ("Subul al-Salam"/Vol. 4/P. 53).

Sixth: In the Sixth Regional Conference on Drugs held in Riyadh in 1974, it was stated: "The Islamic scholars of various schools of thought unanimously agreed on the prohibition of the production, cultivation, and consumption of drugs, whether natural or synthetic, and on criminalizing those who engage in such activities."

In conclusion, the consequences of drug use are devastating to individuals and society, and they conflict with the rulings and wisdom of Islamic law. Therefore, the ruling on drugs is prohibition. Similarly, trafficking in drugs—whether through selling, buying, smuggling, marketing, or profiting—is also forbidden, as anything that leads to something forbidden is itself forbidden.

And all perfect praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds.

 

 

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling if a postpartum woman becomes pure before forty days; are acts of worship obligatory upon her, and is she permissible for her husband?

If the postpartum woman becomes definitely pure before forty days, she must perform the ritual bath and perform acts of worship as a pure woman does. What was prohibited for her also becomes permissible, so she becomes permissible for her husband after her bath. The minimum duration for postpartum bleeding is a moment (an instant), and its usual maximum is forty days. Reaching forty days is not a condition; rather, it is sufficient for the blood to stop or to see the white discharge (qassa bayda'). And Allah the Almighty knows best.

I bought an apartment, and I am saving money to pay the remaining balance of its price — is zakāh obligatory on this money?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Zakāh is obligatory on all saved/hoarded wealth. Once the total wealth reaches the niṣāb (minimum threshold liable for zakah— equivalent to the value of 85 grams of pure 24-karat gold) and a full ḥawl (lunar year) has elapsed over it, zakāh becomes obligatory at a rate of (2.5%) — even if the wealth is earmarked for basic future needs, and even if the wealth's owner is in debt. Debt does not prevent the obligation of zakāh, nor is it deducted when calculating the zakāh due, based on the general and unrestricted wording of all the Qur'anic verses commanding zakāh, which draw no distinction between someone in debt and anyone else.
It is stated in ‘Umdat as-Sālik, from the books of the Shāfi‘ī school: "If someone possesses exactly the niṣāb, and owes an equivalent amount in debt, zakāh remains obligatory on what is in his possession, and the debt does not prevent this obligation" — meaning, the obligation of zakāh on what is presently in his possession.
The ḥawl (annual cycle) recognized for zakāh, as well as for the other sharī‘ah obligations that Allah, the Exalted, has imposed upon Muslims, is the Hijrī (lunar) year. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on a Friday sermon in which the khaṭīb did not explicitly exhort the congregation to be conscious of Allah (taqwā) in both sermons, but sufficed with commanding them to obey Allah and refrain from disobeying Him?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
For the Friday sermon (khuṭbat al-Jumʿah) to be valid, certain essential pillars (arkān) must be fulfilled. Among these is the exhortation to be conscious of Allah (waṣiyyah bi-taqwā Allāh), which must be present in both sermons. Alongside this pillar, the praising of Allah (ḥamdallah) and the sending of blessings upon the Messenger of Allah ﷺ are equally required.
Shaykh al-Islām Imām Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "These three are pillars in each of the two sermons, because each sermon is independent and separate from the other." [Tuḥfat al-Muḥtāj,Vol.4/P.447]
It is not a condition that the exhortation be expressed in any specific wording, nor is it required that the word "taqwā" itself be used — such as saying "I exhort you to be conscious of Allah." Rather, this pillar is fulfilled by any expression that contains a command to obey Allah the Almighty and to abstain from what He has prohibited.
Imām al-Khaṭīb al-Sharbīnī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "The third pillar is the exhortation to taqwā... The specific wording of this exhortation is not required, according to the most correct view, because the purpose is admonition and the urging of obedience to Allah the Almighty. Therefore, any expression that conveys admonition suffices — whether long or short — such as: 'Obey Allah and be ever mindful of Him.'" [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj,Vol.1/P.550]
Accordingly, what the khaṭīb has done — by commanding obedience to Allah and forbidding disobedience to Him in both sermons — is valid and sufficient. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on swearing a false oath by the Holy Quran?

Swearing a false oath by the Holy Quran dips the oath-taker in Hellfire, and one who had done so should turn to Allah in repentance, seek His forgiveness, give back rights to whom they belong, and pay the oath expiation.