عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Drafting Religious Edicts (Fatwas)
Author : Dr. Mousa Za`atreh
Date Added : 09-01-2024

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Drafting Religious Edicts (Fatwas)

 

 

 

Introduction:

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is considered one of the modern technologies characterized by rapid advancement and significant impact in various fields[1]. Among these fields are religious edicts (fatwas) and legal rulings, as they hold a crucial place in the lives of Muslims who seek religious consultations and guidance in various aspects of their life. The influence of artificial intelligence has affected the dissemination and formulation of religious edicts by providing reputable and specialized references in Islamic jurisprudence. Therefore, in this article, we will explore the impact of artificial intelligence on the spread and formulation of religious edicts.

 

Definition of Artificial Intelligence:

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science and a fundamental pillar that underlies current technological advancements. It involves computers simulating intelligent processes that occur within the human mind. The term Artificial Intelligence, often abbreviated as (AI), can be defined as the capability of machines and digital computers to perform specific tasks that mimic and resemble those carried out by intelligent beings[2].

 

Artificial Intelligence refers to the ability of computer devices and programs to execute tasks resembling activities performed by humans. It involves deducing conclusions from data and making intelligent decisions based on algorithms [3] and machine learning. Artificial Intelligence technologies include machine learning, deep learning [4], natural language processing [5], data analysis, and pattern recognition.

 

The impact of artificial intelligence on the dissemination of religious edicts (fatwas):

Artificial intelligence facilitates access to Sharia-related information and answers by analyzing and processing the vast amount of available religious information in books, articles, and previous fatwas. Using machine learning techniques, artificial intelligence can provide quick and accurate religious answers to users and inquirers.

 

However, artificial intelligence has both advantages and disadvantages:

 

Among the advantages of artificial intelligence on religious edicts (fatwas) are:

 

1-Artificial intelligence enables the categorization and organization of religious edicts (fatwas) and legal rulings based on topics, scholars, and references. This allows individuals searching for specific fatwas or legal rulings to easily find information, efficiently navigate reputable sources, and engage directly with religious authorities and respected scholars. This interaction can occur through chat platforms or smart bots, allowing individuals to pose questions and receive direct and immediate answers.

 

2-Another advantage is the capability of artificial intelligence to translate and localize religious edicts and legal rulings from various languages into the user's language. This feature provides a broader and more comprehensive understanding of religious information and offers religious guidance in different languages [6].

 

3-AI enables the spread of religious edicts by allowing individuals easy access to numerous sources of fatwas, whether through online platforms or available applications. It enables effective data browsing and searching, making fatwas and religious information more widely and rapidly accessible to everyone.

4-In the era of modern technology, individuals face the challenge of verifying the accuracy of information received from various sources. AI provides Muslims with the means to verify the authenticity of information, enhancing their ability to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources.

 

Among the disadvantages of artificial intelligence on religious edicts (fatwas) are:

 

1-Artificial intelligence has some negative impacts, especially when it comes to issuing religious edicts and dealing with religious texts. Its deficiency in human-like comprehension makes it challenging to understand the nuances of context and intricate details in religious queries. The skill of comprehending the context and conducting a deep analysis of religious texts, essential for issuing accurate fatwas, is considered a distinctive capability of scholars and religious authorities. For instance, in cases of divorce rulings, these require dialogue with the involved parties and a deep understanding of the wording used, including gauging emotional states. Divorce having taken place may be a reality, but the results from artificial intelligence may not reflect it accurately.

 

2-The use of artificial intelligence may lead to the abandonment of the human aspect, with questions and answers being handled automatically. This could result in the loss of the intellectual and interpretive dimension that distinguishes scholars and experts, especially in financial disputes. Such disputes often require hearing from the opposing party, expressing opinions that may lead to entirely different fatwas compared to those generated by artificial intelligence.

 

3-There are some biased and suspicious platforms for issuing religious edicts that may contradict the consensus of different Islamic schools of thought. Artificial intelligence is not capable of discerning the abnormal or the least preponderant opinion (fatwa) within a particular school of thought. This can lead to confusion in religious edicts, as providing fatwas and offering religious guidance requires deep knowledge in Islamic sciences, understanding the cultural and social context of the inquirers. AI may lack the human aspect and personal experience, thus unable to apply personal considerations that involve direct human interaction.

 

4-Disregard for Jurisprudential Principles: This type of artificial intelligence may not consider the foundational principles in religious edicts. It might mix the principles of different schools of thought, leading to confusion in fatwa issuance. The AI lacks the capability for independent reasoning (ijtihad) and deduction in issuing rulings on specific issues. Instead, it merely compiles the principles of the issue from multiple sources and forms an answer to the question posed to it, irrespective of the correctness or incorrectness of the answer from a religious perspective.

 

5-Despite these potential effects, artificial intelligence is a human effort that has supplied it with information, making the human role limited to providing references. It offers users a perspective on a specific topic and should not be considered an absolute judgment excusable before Allah. It is essential to verify the information produced by artificial intelligence by referring to scholars. It is crucial to emphasize that artificial intelligence can be a tool for disseminating both correct and incorrect religious edicts. Caution is advised, especially in issuing religious edicts, to preserve the human dimension and the necessary cultural and ethical considerations for providing comprehensive and balanced religious edicts.

 

 

 

[1] Artificial Intelligence: Principles and Applications, by Dr. Sami Al-Harbi, p. 16.

[2] Artificial Intelligence Methods, by Ahmed Hani Hammad, p. 1.

[3] An algorithm is a set of mathematical and logical steps needed to solve a specific problem. The term "algorithm" is named after the scientist Abu Ja'far Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, who invented it in the ninth century AD.

[4] Deep learning is a method in artificial intelligence that teaches computer systems to process data in a way inspired by the human brain. Deep learning models recognize complex patterns in images, texts, sounds, and other data to produce accurate insights and predictions.

[5] Natural Language Processing: It is a machine learning technique that enables computer systems to interpret, process, and understand human language.

[6] Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education, by Mariam Shoukry Abdel Rahman, p. 5 (approximate translation).

 

 

 

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

A pregnant woman has iron deficiency. When she showers, she becomes very tired and feels cold. What is the ruling on tayammum in this situation?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
One should not resort to tayammum (dry ablution) as a substitute for the obligatory ghusl (ritual bathing) so long as it remains possible to use water — for example, by heating the water, warming the place where the bathing takes place, or taking other similar precautions. However, if such measures prove ineffective, or are simply not possible to carry out, and performing ghusl [with cold water] would result in severe harm, then tayammum becomes permissible in that case, due to genuine inability to use water on account of the harm that would result, as described in the question. That said, she must make up (qaḍā') the prayers she performed using this tayammum.
It is stated in Bushrā al-Karīm: "One should not perform tayammum on account of cold unless warming the limbs fails to remove the aforementioned harm, and no means are available to heat the water — such as a vessel, firewood, or fire — and one fears [that using cold water would result in] any of the harms mentioned earlier in the discussion on illness: danger to life, loss of function in a limb, the onset or worsening of an illness, delayed recovery, or the [visible bodily] blemish mentioned in that discussion on illness. In such a case, tayammum becomes permissible due to the harm involved, but the prayer must still be made up afterward (qaḍā'). If, however, warming the body proves effective, or the means to heat the water are available, or none of the aforementioned harms are feared — then tayammum is not permissible, even if using the water causes some degree of discomfort or pain, since mere discomfort alone does not permit resorting to tayammum." And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on praying alone (munfaridan) in a row, and what should I do if I enter the mosque together with another person, and there is only a single gap in the first row with no second row present — should I fill that gap in the first row, or should I stand together with him in a new second row?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
If a person enters [the congregation] and finds no space available in the row, it is recommended for him — after making his opening takbīr for the prayer — to gently pull someone from the row in front of him to pray alongside him, provided he senses that this person would be agreeable to it. If that person does not agree, then he prays alone, and there is no dislike attached to his doing so in that case.
If he ends up praying alone [behind the row], it is sunnah for him to stand directly behind the imam. Then, if someone else arrives, that person stands to his right; and whoever comes after them stands to his left — and so on — such that the imam remains centered in the middle of the row. This is done so that everyone attains the reward of congregational prayer.
As for the case where two people enter the prayer together, and there is a gap in the row wide enough for only one person, then the two of them should pray together in a new row [of their own], and whoever arrives after them should fill that original gap. This is because if only one of the two fills the gap, the other would end up praying alone [which is to be avoided when it can easily be prevented].
Al-Khaṭīb ash-Shirbīnī (raḥimahullāh) said in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.1/P.494): "If he does not find space, then it is recommended for him, while still standing, to gently pull a single person from the row toward himself after making his opening takbīr — out of caution, so as to avoid the position held by some scholars that a person's prayer standing alone behind the row is not valid.
Az-Zarkashī and others said: this should only be done if it seems he would agree to it; otherwise, he should not pull anyone — indeed, doing so becomes impermissible, out of fear of causing discord (fitnah). It is recommended for the person being pulled to cooperate and agree, so that he may attain the reward of assisting in righteousness and piety (al-birr wat-taqwā). However, he should not pull one of two people [praying together] from the row, since this would cause one of them to end up praying alone. This is why the 'pulling' described here takes place only after the opening takbīr [i.e., once the person doing the pulling has already validly begun his own prayer]."
Accordingly: it is sunnah for you to pray alongside the person praying alone, and then, if someone else arrives afterward, you may go and fill the gap in the original row. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling if hemorrhoid blood exits after completing ablution?

If this blood is exiting from outside the anus (due to the hemorrhoid protruding), it does not invalidate ablution, because blood exiting from the body from other than the two orifices does not invalidate ablution. If it exits from the anus (meaning from inside it), it invalidates ablution, and one must perform istinja' from it, wash the area of impurity, and repeat the ablution.
However, if this blood exits continuously such that no time remains sufficient for purification and prayer without it flowing, then it takes the ruling of urinary incontinence (sals al-bawl). One then cleanses from it after the time for each prayer enters, performs ablution immediately thereafter, and performs the obligatory prayer immediately. There is no liability upon him after that if something of it flows, and he may pray as many voluntary prayers as he wishes. If he wants to pray another obligatory prayer, he must cleanse himself and perform ablution. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

I work overtime after regular working hours and may become occupied with my phone or the work computer for personal matters — what is the ruling on this?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is obligatory upon an employee to abide by the instructions and regulations governing overtime hours, and equally obligatory to uphold honesty and avoid all forms of deception and dishonesty. Allah the Almighty says {what means}: "O you who have believed, be mindful of Allah and be with the truthful." [Al-Tawbah/ 119]
Whoever is assigned to work overtime must be present at his workplace — even if he has no specific tasks to carry out at that time. In such a case, he should strive as best he can to spend that time in a manner that benefits the institution he works for. If there is genuinely no work for him to do, there is no objection to occupying his time with something beneficial — such as reciting the Holy Qurʾān, reading, or listening to educational lessons — provided he has already completed all the responsibilities assigned to him.
If, however, he does have work to complete, he must spend that time fulfilling it. He may attend to phone calls or other personal matters to the extent that is customarily acceptable, as long as this does not result in delaying or postponing his work. If he delays his work on account of personal preoccupations, the wages he received for that wasted time are not lawfully his to keep, and he is obliged to return the equivalent amount to the institution by whatever means available to him. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More