عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Drafting Religious Edicts (Fatwas)
Author : Dr. Mousa Za`atreh
Date Added : 09-01-2024

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Drafting Religious Edicts (Fatwas)

 

 

 

Introduction:

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is considered one of the modern technologies characterized by rapid advancement and significant impact in various fields[1]. Among these fields are religious edicts (fatwas) and legal rulings, as they hold a crucial place in the lives of Muslims who seek religious consultations and guidance in various aspects of their life. The influence of artificial intelligence has affected the dissemination and formulation of religious edicts by providing reputable and specialized references in Islamic jurisprudence. Therefore, in this article, we will explore the impact of artificial intelligence on the spread and formulation of religious edicts.

 

Definition of Artificial Intelligence:

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science and a fundamental pillar that underlies current technological advancements. It involves computers simulating intelligent processes that occur within the human mind. The term Artificial Intelligence, often abbreviated as (AI), can be defined as the capability of machines and digital computers to perform specific tasks that mimic and resemble those carried out by intelligent beings[2].

 

Artificial Intelligence refers to the ability of computer devices and programs to execute tasks resembling activities performed by humans. It involves deducing conclusions from data and making intelligent decisions based on algorithms [3] and machine learning. Artificial Intelligence technologies include machine learning, deep learning [4], natural language processing [5], data analysis, and pattern recognition.

 

The impact of artificial intelligence on the dissemination of religious edicts (fatwas):

Artificial intelligence facilitates access to Sharia-related information and answers by analyzing and processing the vast amount of available religious information in books, articles, and previous fatwas. Using machine learning techniques, artificial intelligence can provide quick and accurate religious answers to users and inquirers.

 

However, artificial intelligence has both advantages and disadvantages:

 

Among the advantages of artificial intelligence on religious edicts (fatwas) are:

 

1-Artificial intelligence enables the categorization and organization of religious edicts (fatwas) and legal rulings based on topics, scholars, and references. This allows individuals searching for specific fatwas or legal rulings to easily find information, efficiently navigate reputable sources, and engage directly with religious authorities and respected scholars. This interaction can occur through chat platforms or smart bots, allowing individuals to pose questions and receive direct and immediate answers.

 

2-Another advantage is the capability of artificial intelligence to translate and localize religious edicts and legal rulings from various languages into the user's language. This feature provides a broader and more comprehensive understanding of religious information and offers religious guidance in different languages [6].

 

3-AI enables the spread of religious edicts by allowing individuals easy access to numerous sources of fatwas, whether through online platforms or available applications. It enables effective data browsing and searching, making fatwas and religious information more widely and rapidly accessible to everyone.

4-In the era of modern technology, individuals face the challenge of verifying the accuracy of information received from various sources. AI provides Muslims with the means to verify the authenticity of information, enhancing their ability to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources.

 

Among the disadvantages of artificial intelligence on religious edicts (fatwas) are:

 

1-Artificial intelligence has some negative impacts, especially when it comes to issuing religious edicts and dealing with religious texts. Its deficiency in human-like comprehension makes it challenging to understand the nuances of context and intricate details in religious queries. The skill of comprehending the context and conducting a deep analysis of religious texts, essential for issuing accurate fatwas, is considered a distinctive capability of scholars and religious authorities. For instance, in cases of divorce rulings, these require dialogue with the involved parties and a deep understanding of the wording used, including gauging emotional states. Divorce having taken place may be a reality, but the results from artificial intelligence may not reflect it accurately.

 

2-The use of artificial intelligence may lead to the abandonment of the human aspect, with questions and answers being handled automatically. This could result in the loss of the intellectual and interpretive dimension that distinguishes scholars and experts, especially in financial disputes. Such disputes often require hearing from the opposing party, expressing opinions that may lead to entirely different fatwas compared to those generated by artificial intelligence.

 

3-There are some biased and suspicious platforms for issuing religious edicts that may contradict the consensus of different Islamic schools of thought. Artificial intelligence is not capable of discerning the abnormal or the least preponderant opinion (fatwa) within a particular school of thought. This can lead to confusion in religious edicts, as providing fatwas and offering religious guidance requires deep knowledge in Islamic sciences, understanding the cultural and social context of the inquirers. AI may lack the human aspect and personal experience, thus unable to apply personal considerations that involve direct human interaction.

 

4-Disregard for Jurisprudential Principles: This type of artificial intelligence may not consider the foundational principles in religious edicts. It might mix the principles of different schools of thought, leading to confusion in fatwa issuance. The AI lacks the capability for independent reasoning (ijtihad) and deduction in issuing rulings on specific issues. Instead, it merely compiles the principles of the issue from multiple sources and forms an answer to the question posed to it, irrespective of the correctness or incorrectness of the answer from a religious perspective.

 

5-Despite these potential effects, artificial intelligence is a human effort that has supplied it with information, making the human role limited to providing references. It offers users a perspective on a specific topic and should not be considered an absolute judgment excusable before Allah. It is essential to verify the information produced by artificial intelligence by referring to scholars. It is crucial to emphasize that artificial intelligence can be a tool for disseminating both correct and incorrect religious edicts. Caution is advised, especially in issuing religious edicts, to preserve the human dimension and the necessary cultural and ethical considerations for providing comprehensive and balanced religious edicts.

 

 

 

[1] Artificial Intelligence: Principles and Applications, by Dr. Sami Al-Harbi, p. 16.

[2] Artificial Intelligence Methods, by Ahmed Hani Hammad, p. 1.

[3] An algorithm is a set of mathematical and logical steps needed to solve a specific problem. The term "algorithm" is named after the scientist Abu Ja'far Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, who invented it in the ninth century AD.

[4] Deep learning is a method in artificial intelligence that teaches computer systems to process data in a way inspired by the human brain. Deep learning models recognize complex patterns in images, texts, sounds, and other data to produce accurate insights and predictions.

[5] Natural Language Processing: It is a machine learning technique that enables computer systems to interpret, process, and understand human language.

[6] Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education, by Mariam Shoukry Abdel Rahman, p. 5 (approximate translation).

 

 

 

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

My father has debts and asked me to repay them years ago, and I promised him I would do so upon his death — is it permissible for me to go back on my promise given that I am unable to repay them, especially since he refuses to contribute to repayment on the grounds that the debt has become my responsibility by virtue of my promise?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The established principle is that a father's debt is to be repaid from his own wealth, if he possesses sufficient means. As for the promise made by the son to repay it on his father's behalf, fulfilling such a promise is strongly recommended, and breaking it is considerably disliked. Shaykh al-Islām Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "Fulfilling a promise is emphatically recommended, and breaking it is severely disliked. The evidences for this from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah are well known." [Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn,Vol. 2/P.278] Shaykh al-Islām Imām Zakariyyā al-Anṣārī, may Allah have mercy upon him, further states: "The reason fulfilling a promise is not obligatory and breaking it is not forbidden is that a promise is in the nature of a gift, and a gift does not become binding except upon receipt." [Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib,Vol. 2/P.487]
Given that the son does not possess the financial means to fulfil his promise to his father, breaking this promise falls beyond his capacity — and Allah does not burden a soul beyond what it can bear. Since the father himself possesses sufficient wealth to settle his own debt, repayment must be made from his own funds. Should he pass away before doing so, the debt is to be settled from his estate. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for a woman who has become pure before the end of forty days of confinement to perform different acts of worship? and is it lawful for her husband to have sex with her?

Once postpartum bleeding ceases and she is certain that it won`t happen again, she becomes pure, and so she should perform Ghusl (ritual bath), pray, and fast. She can also have sex with her husband even before the end of (40) days because the minimum of postpartum bleeding is a moment, and the maximum is (60) days. However, the postpartum bleeding for the majority of women is (40) days, but this does not apply to rest of them.

I work overtime after regular working hours and may become occupied with my phone or the work computer for personal matters — what is the ruling on this?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is obligatory upon an employee to abide by the instructions and regulations governing overtime hours, and equally obligatory to uphold honesty and avoid all forms of deception and dishonesty. Allah the Almighty says {what means}: "O you who have believed, be mindful of Allah and be with the truthful." [Al-Tawbah/ 119]
Whoever is assigned to work overtime must be present at his workplace — even if he has no specific tasks to carry out at that time. In such a case, he should strive as best he can to spend that time in a manner that benefits the institution he works for. If there is genuinely no work for him to do, there is no objection to occupying his time with something beneficial — such as reciting the Holy Qurʾān, reading, or listening to educational lessons — provided he has already completed all the responsibilities assigned to him.
If, however, he does have work to complete, he must spend that time fulfilling it. He may attend to phone calls or other personal matters to the extent that is customarily acceptable, as long as this does not result in delaying or postponing his work. If he delays his work on account of personal preoccupations, the wages he received for that wasted time are not lawfully his to keep, and he is obliged to return the equivalent amount to the institution by whatever means available to him. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for someone who is unable to fast to pay the fidyah (ransom/compensation payment) to himself, due to his own poverty?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is not permissible, nor does it fulfill the obligation, for a sick person who is currently and permanently unable to fast to pay the fidyah (ransom/compensation payment) to himself, since it is a financial obligation owed by him, established as a standing debt upon him — much like any other debt he owes. If he were to pay it to himself, it would not thereby be discharged. So if he cannot find [anyone eligible to] pay it to, it remains a standing obligation upon him, and is not thereby waived. If Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, later grants him wealth, it becomes obligatory upon him to pay it out to the poor and needy.
Imam al-Khaṭīb ash-Shirbīnī (raḥimahullāh) said: "There is no difference in the obligation of the fidyah between the wealthy and the poor person; its benefit lies in its remaining established as a standing debt upon the poor person [until he is able to pay it] — and this is the more correct position (al-aṣaḥḥ), as indicated by the wording of ar-Rawḍah and its source text." [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol.2/P.174]
Accordingly: it is not permissible for a Muslim to pay the fidyah to himself while he remains poor. If the sick person is poor, he is not obligated to pay the fidyah immediately, and it remains a standing debt upon him until a time when he has sufficient means and wealth. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

See More