Articles

The Emergence of the Islamic Economy
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 01-02-2023

The Emergence of the Islamic Economy

Reflecting on the terms used in the definition of the Islamic economy-to which we have referred earlier-in terms of wealth, money, monetization, ownership, spending, production, investment, services, savings, and issues concerning richness and poverty, shows that Muslims are among the first to care for and write thousands of books about economic issues.

This leads us to differentiate between two terms:

First: The Islamic Economic Doctrine

It represents the general principles contained in the texts of Sharia (Quran and the Prophetic Sunnah). These principles are immutable and as a whole, they constitute rules governing the economic life with its totalities. It is fit to say that they are the holistic rules for the diverse applications and the detailed particulars of the vocabulary of the Islamic economy.

Second: The Islamic Economic System

It represents the applied aspect with its subdivisions, which vary with time and place, and is the subject of the Ijtihad (process of legal reasoning and hermeneutics through which the jurist-mujtahid derives or rationalizes law based on the Qur'an and the Sunna) of the scholars as well as the consideration of the jurists. In fact, the ruling on emerging issues of Islamic jurisprudence/Fiqh, contemporary issues of financial transactions, and the economy is only one form of the Islamic economic system.

It is therefore fit to say: "The Islamic economy is divine in terms of doctrine and secular in terms of system or application" (see the book entitled "The Subjectivity of Islamic Economic Policy and the Importance of the Islamic Economy " by Dr. Mohammed Shawki Al-Finjri,pp.18).

If we dwell on the Islamic economic doctrine, we realize that Islam is the first to determine the general principles and the holistic rules on which the economic system, with its various applications, is built. 

The rules of justice, the prohibition of Riba (Usury/interest), injustice, grave deception, fraud, even the rules of ownership, consumption, production, distribution, etc., are all found in the Holy Quran, the Prophetic Sunnah, exegesis, Hadith, and Fiqh.

Allah Commands working to earn a livelihood and this represents production in its most obvious form. He, The Almighty Says (What means): "It is He Who has made the earth manageable for you, so traverse ye through its tracts and enjoy of the Sustenance which He furnishes: but unto Him is the Resurrection." {Al-Mulk/15}.

The Holy Sunnah has highlighted the issue of public property. A man of the Companions narrated: I went on an expedition with the Prophet (PBUH) and heard him say, "People are partners in three things: grazing, pasture, water and fire." {Sunan Abi Dawoud}. 

As for private property, verses on inheritance represent a clear case and form of its applications. Abu Hurra ar-Raqashi on his paternal uncle’s authority reported God’s Messenger as saying: “You must not act oppressively, and a man’s property may not be taken except with his goodwill.” {Al-Sunan Al-Kubra of Al-Baihaqhi}. This Hadith clearly reflects the right to private ownership.

The holy Sunnah also addresses the economic balance in society and ways of achieving it by prohibiting monopoly, Riba and injustice. This is also clearly reflected in the following verse: "What God has bestowed on His Apostle (and taken away) from the people of the townships,- belongs to God,- to His Apostle and to kindred and orphans, the needy and the wayfarer; In order that it may not (merely) make a circuit between the wealthy among you." {Al-Hashir/7}. This verse contains several wisdoms behind Zakah (Obligatory charity), spending, operating funds instead of sufficing with saving them, prohibiting monopoly and Riba. In total, these make up the natural economic balance and this is what the Muslim community should be like.

If we examine all the examples taken from the texts of Sharia in clarifying the vocabulary of the Islamic economy, a great deal of time will be needed. Therefore, we will suffice with what has been referred to.

If we look at the Islamic economic system and its practical aspects and partial branches, we will find a number of specialized books in some branches of the Islamic economy, in addition to the scattered economic knowledge in the details of transactions in the different books of Fiqh, Hadith and exegesis.

Rather, we find "The writings of Ibn Khaldoun, Megrezi, Ayeni and Dalji in the late 14th and 15th centuries as the starting point of the scientific school in modern economics" (The Brief in the Islamic Economy by Dr. Mohammed Shawki Finjri, P. 27).

Dr. Zaki Mahmoud Shabana, former deputy of Azhar University, establishes that Ibn Khaldoun's book/ The Muqaddimah (Introduction), which appeared in 784 AH, is similar to the book (Wealth of Nations) by Adam Smith whom some call the Father of Modern Economics. The latter wrote this book in 1776 while Ibn Khaldoun wrote his book five centuries ago. (Wealth of Nations) is even considered a distorted image of Ibn Khaldoun's Muqaddimah and only differs from it environmentally and temporally. (Al-Wajiz by Fanjri, p. 27, and The Islamic Economic System by Dr. Mahmoud Al-Khatib, p. 16).

A closer look at Ibn Khaldoun's book reflects the volume of specialized economic knowledge found in this cultural treasure. It also paves the way for modern and advanced economic theories, such as economic growth, population theory and state economic activity. (Muslims and Economics: Ibn Khaldoun Founder of Economics, by Dr. Shawqi Ahmad Dunya, P.6)

This is in addition to other books about the various vocabularies of Islamic Economics in the early Hijri centuries. For example, Kitab al-Kharaj by Abu Yusuf who died 182 AH, Al-Kharaj by Adam Al-Qurashi who died in 203 AH, and Al-Amwal by Obeid who died in 224 AH, in addition to many other books.

In the second half of the twentieth century, after the emergence of modern secular economic doctrines and development of modern economic systems, Islamic economic studies began to emerge, and the Islamic economy began, as a science and thought, through international conferences. The latter were introduced by the First Conference of Islamic Economics in Makkah in 1976. Afterwards, specialized conferences and seminars were held and Islamic economics was singled out as a specialization in Sharia colleges and departments. Moreover, scholars began writing books on the Islamic Economics. The most notable scholars to write on this field were Prof. Mohammad Baqer al-Sadr, Ali Abdul-Rasoul and Dr. Mohammed Al-Mubarak, Dr. Ahmed Al-Najjar, Dr. Ref`at Al-Awadhi, and many others...

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

Is the Saying "Whatever is Taken by the Sword of Shyness is Forbidden" an Authentic Ḥadīth?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The saying "Whatever is taken by the sword of shyness is forbidden" is not an authentic ḥadīth, though its underlying meaning is sound. The established sharʿī principle is that a Muslim's wealth is not lawful for anyone to take except with his wholehearted consent, as Allah the Almighty says {what means}: "O you who have believed, do not consume one another's wealth unjustly, but only [in lawful] business by mutual consent." [Al-Nisā/ 29] And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Listen to me and you will live well: do not wrong others, do not wrong others, do not wrong others. Indeed, a man's wealth is not lawful except with his full, willing consent." (Reported by Aḥmad in his Musnad.) Whatever is taken through the pressure of shyness or social embarrassment runs directly counter to genuine, wholehearted consent.
The jurists have explicitly stated that whatever is taken by means of the "sword of shyness" carries the same ruling as that which is taken by coercion — it must be returned to its rightful owner.
Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states in al-Fatāwā al-Kubrā (Vol.3/P.30): "Do you not see the reported scholarly consensus that whoever has something taken from him purely out of shyness, without his genuine consent, does not pass ownership of it to the one who took it? They reasoned that this constitutes a form of coercion through the 'sword of shyness,' comparable to coercion at the point of an actual sword. Indeed, many people would rather submit to the literal sword and endure the pain of its wound than submit to this first kind of coercion, out of fear for their dignity and standing — which people of sound judgment hold dear and guard most fiercely." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on wiping the front of the head beneath the ḥijāb, and is it permissible to wipe over the ḥijāb if it was put on while in a state of purification (wudu`)?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is permissible to wipe the front portion of the head (nāṣiyah) with the fingertips. It is likewise sufficient to place a wet hand over a head covering (ḥijāb), provided the moisture actually reaches the hair beneath it — if it does not, it does not suffice. A head covering is not treated in the same manner as leather socks (khuff) and may not be wiped over in lieu of the head itself.
Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states in al-Majmūʿ (Vol.1/P.407): "If a person is wearing a turban and does not wish to remove it — whether for a valid reason or otherwise — he should wipe the entire front portion of the head... The same ruling applies to whatever a woman wears on her head. If, however, he confines himself to wiping over the turban without wiping any part of the head itself, this does not suffice — and there is no disagreement among us on this point." He further states: "A woman is like a man in the manner of wiping the head... She should insert her hand beneath her head covering so that the wiping falls upon the hair itself. If she places her wet hand over her head covering, our scholars stated: if the moisture does not reach the hair, it does not suffice her." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on the Friday bath (ghusl al-Jumu'ah)?

The Friday bath is a confirmed Sunnah, based on the Prophet's (peace be upon him) saying: "Whoever performs ablution on Friday, it is good for him, and whoever takes a bath, bathing is better." (Reported by Abu Dawud and al-Tirmidhi who said it is a hasan hadith). It is recommended for everyone who wants to attend the Friday prayer, even if they are not from its usual attendees, like a woman or a boy.
If a person is in a state of major impurity (junub) and intends by his bath both lifting the major impurity and the Friday bath, he achieves both. If he intends only one of them, he achieves only what he intended. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, and is it permissible to slaughter the ewe if one knows it is pregnant?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a person slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, the fetus becomes lawful (ḥalāl) by virtue of its mother's slaughter (tabaʿan li-ummihā).
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.6/P.158): "A fetus found dead [after the mother's slaughter], or found alive but in a state resembling that of a slaughtered animal [i.e., dying shortly after], becomes lawful — whether or not it had grown fur — provided it is found in the womb of a mother that was lawfully slaughtered, whether her slaughter was by cutting the throat, or by an arrow or hunting dog sent after her. This is based on the ḥadīth: 'The slaughtering of the fetus is [effected by] the slaughtering of its mother' [narrated by al-Tirmidhī, who graded it ḥasan, and by Ibn Ḥibbān, who graded it ṣaḥīḥ] — meaning that the slaughter which rendered the mother lawful renders the fetus lawful as well, by virtue of following her; and because the fetus is one of her constituent parts, and her slaughter renders lawful all of her parts."
This ruling differs, however, from the case of one who knows from the outset that the ewe is pregnant [and intends to sacrifice her specifically as the udḥiyah while pregnant] — in which case, according to the Shāfi'ī school, she does not fulfill the requirement of a valid sacrifice.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Bujayrimī 'alā al-Khaṭīb (Vol.4/P.335): "A pregnant animal does not fulfill the requirement [of a valid sacrifice], and this is the authoritative position (al-mu'tamad), because pregnancy diminishes the quality of the meat. As for why such an animal is nevertheless counted as complete [i.e., fully valid] in matters of zakāh, that is because the intent there is reproduction (nasl), not the quality of the meat.". And Allah, the Most High, knows best.