عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Family Ties
Author : Dr. Ahmad Al-Harasees
Date Added : 10-01-2023

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Family Ties

 

 

All perfect praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds; may His peace and blessings be upon Prophet Mohammad, his family and noble companions.

Allah The Almighty Says {What means}: "Be sure we shall test you with something of fear and hunger, some loss in goods or lives or the fruits (of your toil), but give glad tidings to those who patiently persevere," {Al-Baqarah/155}.

In light of this global pandemic and the spatiotemporal frame of the social reality in Jordan, two trends can be observed:

First: The positive trend.  Creating opportunity from the very womb of affliction and positive changes in the visible and clear patterns of behavior in society as a whole or in the family. Both sociologists and specialists in social and family relations must consider these changes, work on the change management process, strengthen the positives and build on them.

There are several examples on this; some of which are: abstaining from what is called "Conspicuous consumption", investing in new positive patterns in the family system and building on them in the future; particularly since the pandemic has given a bigger chance for interdependence and solidarity within the family itself. In addition, the family system and solidarity among its members must be worked on in the future. This can be achieved through paying more attention to solidarity and love compared to rights and duties. In this regard, Allah Says  {What means}: " And among His Signs is this, that He created for you mates from among yourselves, that ye may dwell in tranquility with them, and He has put love and mercy between your (hearts): verily in that are Signs for those who reflect." {Ar-rum/21}.

Many aspects of excessive extravagance related to happy as well as sad occasions have changed. This is in addition to terminating extravagance and ostentation, and burdening the family with issues concerning society`s security.

Hence societal effort through the society as a whole, governmental or voluntary, emphasized these positives via media, cultural platforms, and the fatwas-based on divine guidance and Prophetic traditions-issued by the Iftaa` Department in this regard. In fact, several Friday sermons addressing this pandemic were delivered prior to the comprehensive ban. Their theme was the higher objectives of Sharia; namely preserving life and the importance of prevention as it is better than cure. Then a fatwa was issued regarding the permissibility of praying Friday and congregational prayers at home during the time of the pandemic was an act of new Ijtihad.* The latter took the common good into consideration by laying emphasis on preserving life as one of the higher objectives of Sharia. Moreover, many fatwas were issued concerning social distancing, spacing among prayer performers, wearing masks, instructions of attending Friday and congregational prayers, and washing the person who died due to COVID-19. This is in addition to many fatwas and Sharia guidance, which had a significant effect in raising people`s awareness, not questioning the instructions issued about this pandemic within the frames of Ijtihad conducted on the higher objectives of Sharia.

Second: The negative impact of the pandemic. On top of this is the financial status of many families relying on daily income, which led to family problems and divorce cases caused by poverty, destitution, and inability to secure the basic needs of the family.

I refer here to the need to study the poll published by the Center for Strategic Studies of the University of Jordan on "COVID-19 and Domestic Violence." It showed results and indicators that needed careful consideration. However, some results were positive, must be focused on, built on, and encouraged. One of these is society`s rejection to the idea that it is the right of the husband to be violent against his wife. The percentage in favor of this idea was 99%, 85% recognized wife`s household responsibilities, 66% tried to find solutions for their children problems, and 80% was the percentage of parent-child communication, in addition to many other positive aspects.

In conclusion, this pandemic has shown many positive as well as negative aspects in society. It is the duty of the professionals of this field to study further this case, build on the positives within the society change management, and reduce the negative aspects through awareness raising.

We ask Allah The Exalted to protect Jordan and its people, and end this scourge. All perfect praise be to Allah The Lord of The Worlds.

 

 

* Ijtihad is an Islamic legal term referring to independent reasoning by an expert in Islamic law, or the thorough exertion of a jurist's mental faculty in finding a solution to a legal question. It is contrasted with taqlid.

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on forgiving a tenant next month's rent, with the intention of counting it toward zakāh al-māl?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It does not fulfill the obligation to count the rent owed on a house, or a portion of it, in lieu of zakāh. Rather, it is necessary to first transfer ownership of the zakāh amount to the poor person directly; only afterward may he be asked to pay the rent [from that money].
It is stated in ‘Umdat as-Sālik (p. 112): "If someone gives [money] to a poor person, stipulating that the recipient return it to him in payment of a debt owed to him, or says, 'I am making what you owe me into zakāh, so take it [as such]' — this is not valid. But if he gives it to him with the [unstated] intention that the recipient will use it to repay him, or says, 'Repay what you owe me, so that I may [then separately] give it to you as zakāh,' or the debtor himself says, 'Give it to me, so that I may [then] repay you with it' — this is valid, and there is no binding obligation for the recipient to actually fulfill this [informal understanding]."
We would also remind [the reader] of the ḥadīth of the Prophet ﷺ: "The Muslim is the brother of the Muslim: he does not wrong him, nor does he abandon him [to harm]. Whoever attends to the needs of his brother, Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, will attend to his needs. Whoever relieves a Muslim of a hardship, Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, will relieve him of one of the hardships of the Day of Resurrection. And whoever conceals [the faults of] a Muslim, Allah will conceal him on the Day of Resurrection." (Agreed upon). And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on praying behind a disliked Imam?

 

 
Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is mildly disliked (Makruh Tanzihan) for a man—other than the permanent designated Imam (Imam Ratib)—to lead people in prayer if the majority of them dislike him due to a religiously blameworthy reason (Amr Madhmum Shar‘an), such as associating with open sinners (Fussaq), for example. As for the followers who dislike him, the prayer behind him is not disliked for them. However, if less than the majority dislike him, or if the majority dislike him for a reason that is not religiously blameworthy, then his leading the prayer is not disliked. And Allah the Exalted knows best.

Is it a condition that a woman should untie her locks while making Ghusl (ritual bath)?

Ghusl from Janabah (ritual impurity), or menstruation obligates that water reaches the roots of the hair in order for the Ghusl to be valid, but if it doesn`t, then hair locks must be untied for water to reach them, and for Ghusl to become valid.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

See More