Articles

Islamic Economy (An Introduction)
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 12-09-2022

Islamic Economy (An Introduction)

 

Amidst the increasing economic crises that hit countries every now and then, the recent fall of capitalist economy, the failure of socialism, and the fall of communism in the late eighties, conflicting calls have emerged:

First: A call for the application of an Islamic economic system, encompassing macro and micro levels, doesn`t discriminate between classes, swings between the steadiness of the total principles and the flexibility of the application to the branches. Accordingly, it constitutes a comprehensive system for mankind, deriving its comprehensiveness from the fact that Sharia is applicable to every time and place. 

Second: A call for applying the fittest economic system to mankind, as agreed by countries, be that system capitalist, socialist or mixed. As a matter of fact, there isn`t what is called an Islamic economic system. Rather, there are mere viewpoints and reasoning that impose a certain meaning on texts of Sharia and limited banking experiences that don`t live up to be called an economic system, in addition to failure to find comprehensive developmental solutions.

What is the concept of the Islamic economy? How true is the assumption that there is an Islamic economic system? We will attempt to give an answer through the following:

From a linguistic viewpoint, economy refers to spending between exceeding and falling short. For more details, kindly check [Al-Mohkam Wal Moheet Al-`Adam by Ibn Seedoh, vol.6/pp.186]. As a term, it refers to "The science that investigates all that is related to fortune, money, earnings, possessing, spending, production, investment, services, savings, poverty and richness." [Al-Mo`jam Al-Iktisadi Al-Islami by Dr. Ahmad Al-Shorbasi, pp.36].

 

Leaving such definitions aside, let`s consider some definitions delivered by contemporary scholars of Islamic economy:

 

First: It is impossible that the Sharia, which is eternal and fits for every time and place, lacks general rules and controls for the themes of Economics, such as fortune, investment, production, and the like. This is because these have to do with man`s succession on earth. These elevate life and cause it to continue; however, without them society will return to the life of the jungle and take the path of extinction. Rather, these themes are amongst the requirements for the perfection of Sharia, about which Almighty Allah Said (What means): "This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion." [Al-Ma`idah/3].

 

Second: Demonstrating the greatness and comprehensiveness of Sharia to all aspects of life, including economic terminology, is one method for calling people to the way of Allah. Rather, it is calling to Him with insight and knowledge. This call also needs scholars of economy who are aware of the minutest details of this field and its emerging issues from Sharia, legal, and specialist technical aspects. Their knowledge and experience will enable them to deliver Fatwa, make disciplined Ijtihad, and understand texts using their talent in jurisprudence. We may add that this is a collective obligation.

 

Third: The general rules and the total principles of Sharia are tantamount to a general constitution on which rulings rely. "In terms of jurisprudential principles, the economic policy of Islam is divine, but in terms of application, it is secular." [Thatiyat Al-Siyasa Al-Ektisadiya Al-Islameyah Wa Ahmeyat Al-Ektisad Al-Islamic by Dr. Moh. Shawki Al-Fangari, pp.18]. Consequently, there are many texts of Sharia about the economic policy. For example, Allah The Almighty Says (What means): "And do not eat up your property among yourselves for vanities, nor use it as bait for the judges, with intent that ye may eat up wrongfully and knowingly a little of (other) people’s property." [Al-Baqara/188]. He also Says (What means): "In order that it may not (merely) make a circuit between the wealthy among you." [Al-Hashir/7]. Moreover, narrated a man of the Companions (RA): I went on an expedition with the Prophet (PBUH) and heard him saying: "People are partners in three things: grazing, pasture, water and fire." [Reported by Ahmad and Abu Dawood, and its narrators are reliable (thiqah)]. The Prophet (PBUH) said: "If anyone makes a barren land productive, then it belongs to him." [Reported by Ath-Thalatha. At-Tirmidhi graded it Hasan (good)].

Economic theories that fit to be a just comprehensive economic system for reforming mankind have been established upon these jurisprudential principles.

 

Fourth: We conclude that Islamic economy is "A science that examines whatever is related to fortune, money, earning, possessing, spending, production, investment, services, savings, poverty and richness in light of the principles of Sharia, its total rules, and the Islamic value system."

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

My father has debts and asked me to repay them years ago, and I promised him I would do so upon his death — is it permissible for me to go back on my promise given that I am unable to repay them, especially since he refuses to contribute to repayment on the grounds that the debt has become my responsibility by virtue of my promise?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The established principle is that a father's debt is to be repaid from his own wealth, if he possesses sufficient means. As for the promise made by the son to repay it on his father's behalf, fulfilling such a promise is strongly recommended, and breaking it is considerably disliked. Shaykh al-Islām Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "Fulfilling a promise is emphatically recommended, and breaking it is severely disliked. The evidences for this from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah are well known." [Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn,Vol. 2/P.278] Shaykh al-Islām Imām Zakariyyā al-Anṣārī, may Allah have mercy upon him, further states: "The reason fulfilling a promise is not obligatory and breaking it is not forbidden is that a promise is in the nature of a gift, and a gift does not become binding except upon receipt." [Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib,Vol. 2/P.487]
Given that the son does not possess the financial means to fulfil his promise to his father, breaking this promise falls beyond his capacity — and Allah does not burden a soul beyond what it can bear. Since the father himself possesses sufficient wealth to settle his own debt, repayment must be made from his own funds. Should he pass away before doing so, the debt is to be settled from his estate. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Does the clipping of nails nullify ablution?

No, it does not, and it is preferable to wash the hands afterwards.

What is the ruling on a Friday sermon in which the khaṭīb did not explicitly exhort the congregation to be conscious of Allah (taqwā) in both sermons, but sufficed with commanding them to obey Allah and refrain from disobeying Him?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
For the Friday sermon (khuṭbat al-Jumʿah) to be valid, certain essential pillars (arkān) must be fulfilled. Among these is the exhortation to be conscious of Allah (waṣiyyah bi-taqwā Allāh), which must be present in both sermons. Alongside this pillar, the praising of Allah (ḥamdallah) and the sending of blessings upon the Messenger of Allah ﷺ are equally required.
Shaykh al-Islām Imām Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "These three are pillars in each of the two sermons, because each sermon is independent and separate from the other." [Tuḥfat al-Muḥtāj,Vol.4/P.447]
It is not a condition that the exhortation be expressed in any specific wording, nor is it required that the word "taqwā" itself be used — such as saying "I exhort you to be conscious of Allah." Rather, this pillar is fulfilled by any expression that contains a command to obey Allah the Almighty and to abstain from what He has prohibited.
Imām al-Khaṭīb al-Sharbīnī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "The third pillar is the exhortation to taqwā... The specific wording of this exhortation is not required, according to the most correct view, because the purpose is admonition and the urging of obedience to Allah the Almighty. Therefore, any expression that conveys admonition suffices — whether long or short — such as: 'Obey Allah and be ever mindful of Him.'" [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj,Vol.1/P.550]
Accordingly, what the khaṭīb has done — by commanding obedience to Allah and forbidding disobedience to Him in both sermons — is valid and sufficient. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is the Saying "Whatever is Taken by the Sword of Shyness is Forbidden" an Authentic Ḥadīth?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The saying "Whatever is taken by the sword of shyness is forbidden" is not an authentic ḥadīth, though its underlying meaning is sound. The established sharʿī principle is that a Muslim's wealth is not lawful for anyone to take except with his wholehearted consent, as Allah the Almighty says {what means}: "O you who have believed, do not consume one another's wealth unjustly, but only [in lawful] business by mutual consent." [Al-Nisā/ 29] And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Listen to me and you will live well: do not wrong others, do not wrong others, do not wrong others. Indeed, a man's wealth is not lawful except with his full, willing consent." (Reported by Aḥmad in his Musnad.) Whatever is taken through the pressure of shyness or social embarrassment runs directly counter to genuine, wholehearted consent.
The jurists have explicitly stated that whatever is taken by means of the "sword of shyness" carries the same ruling as that which is taken by coercion — it must be returned to its rightful owner.
Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states in al-Fatāwā al-Kubrā (Vol.3/P.30): "Do you not see the reported scholarly consensus that whoever has something taken from him purely out of shyness, without his genuine consent, does not pass ownership of it to the one who took it? They reasoned that this constitutes a form of coercion through the 'sword of shyness,' comparable to coercion at the point of an actual sword. Indeed, many people would rather submit to the literal sword and endure the pain of its wound than submit to this first kind of coercion, out of fear for their dignity and standing — which people of sound judgment hold dear and guard most fiercely." And Allah the Almighty knows best.