عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Islamic Finance According to the Dinar Standard Report 2021/2022
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 11-09-2022

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Islamic Finance According to the Dinar Standard Report 2021/2022

 

COVID-19 pandemic had an evident impact on the economic, social, and political sectors of life. The Islamic finance sector is a key contributor to economic life worldwide, given its development and incremental aspects of growth in recent years.

Amongst the most important and precise technical studies indicating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Islamic finance (2021/2022) in numbers is the report prepared by Dinar Standard in partnership with Salam Gateway with the support of DIEDC. This report was published by the International Islamic Center for Reconciliation and Arbitration (IICRA) in Dubai, Edition No. (19), 4rth quarter, 1443 H/June 2022.

The key points of this report are:

First: The value of Islamic finance assets in 2019 has risen from 2.52 trillion US dollars to 2.88 trillion US dollars amounting to 13.9%. The report expected this sector to recover over the coming five years with an overall growth by 5%.

Second: The rapid growth of the Islamic Takaful insurance, especially in the Gulf countries and Indonesia.

Third: 2020 witnessed a large number of initiatives and measures that help enhance the growth of Islamic finance, particularly in the countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. In addition, it was decided to establish new Islamic banks in countries such as Tajikistan, Uganda and the Philippines, in addition to digital banks in Kazakhstan and Malaysia.

Fourth: The investment of Islamic Financial Technology as well as the combination Islamic financial institutions through out possession and combination that reached 4.93bn. in 2019 to 2020.

Fifth: The activity of the Islamic Sukuk decreased but didn`t stop where it was announced that new Sukuk were issued in south Africa, Nigeria, Britain, Gulf and south east Asia countries.

Sixth: Developing the sector of social finance through collective funding, fostering partnerships between the private and public sectors or supporting small and medium-sized finance institutions. 

Based on the above notes, the following can be noticed:

  1. Despite the fact that the report was prepared during the COVID-19 pandemic, Islamic finance has witnessed an evident growth and recovery is expected in the coming years. In the same year of preparing this report, the number of the Islamic finance institutions has reached 1462.
  2. Adopting social finance that rests on Takaful and cooperation between people to ease their problems, as is the case with Zakah (Alms giving) and Sadqah (Voluntary charity) and providing financial support to small and medium-sized financial institutions. Moreover, partnership between the private and public sectors is an example of this form of finance. New platforms have been established for collective funding between counterparts in Britain and Malaysia, and an initiative was launched to benefit from social Islamic finance in the UN in partnership with the Islamic Bank for Development in 2021 (news.UN.org).
  3. The COVID-19 pandemic encouraged Islamic finance to develop financial technology through modern electronic platforms, digital banks, and distinguished services of digital banking.
  4. Islami Sukuk have witnessed a remarkable growth within the recent years. As indicated by the report, this product hasn`t stopped despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic where their issuance was resumed in several countries. Here, it is worth pointing that later in the year 2021, the fourth issuance of the Sukuk for the Murabah to the purchase orderer were issued in favor of the Jordan National Electricity Company to fund the energy sector with a total value of 225 million JDs by an annual Murabaha percentage of 3.55% over five years.

Unequivocally, these notes indicate that the Islamic finance sector is replete with Sharia, technical, and legal competencies enabling it to face difficult situations, such as COVID-19 pandemic to create an opportunity to keep abreast with developments, innovate new products to address the needs of the people, and continue Islamic finance services.  

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

The imam recited a verse containing a prostration of recitation (*sajdat al-tilāwah*) but did not prostrate. After the imam's *salām*, a follower (*maʾmūm*) performed a prostration of forgetfulness (*sujūd al-sahw*) because the imam had not performed the prostration of recitation. Is it permissible to go against the imam in this way?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
There is no sin on the imam if he omits the prostration of recitation (sujūd al-tilāwah), even deliberately. The maʾmūm (the one following the imam) is obliged to follow the imam in the prayer, so if the imam does not perform the prostration of recitation, it is not permissible for the follower to prostrate, because the imam is appointed only to be followed.
If the follower introduces a prostration after the imam’s salām but before his own salām, in a case where there is no prostration of forgetfulness (sujūd al-sahw), his prayer is invalidated if he knew it to be prohibited. Otherwise, he is excused on account of his ignorance and his prayer is not invalidated.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Imām al-Jamal ʿalā Fatḥ al-Wahhāb: “His statement: ‘So the omission of the hayʾāt (the non-essential sunnahs of the prayer) is not compensated for by prostration; if one prostrates for any of them deliberately, his prayer is invalidated, unless he is excused due to his ignorance.’”
Since this issue is one that is hidden from the laymen, as it is among the subtleties of knowledge, and the laymen are excused for ignorance of whatever is of such a nature, and their act of obedience is not invalidated because of it, it may be said that the prayer of one who has not acquired knowledge of this issue is not invalidated, with the necessity of learning the rulings remaining. As for after knowing it, the prayer is invalidated. And Allah Almighty knows best.

How should a person who is afflicted with continued major ritual impurity (incontinence of urine, bleeding outside the monthly period) perform ablution?

Such a person should make ablution for every prayer after its due time and after removing impurities from their body and outfit, and should place a fresh diaper whenever needed so as for the impurity not to spread out. They should also perform prayer immediately even if incontinence of urine continued, and should repeat the aforementioned for every obligatory prayer, then perform optional prayer as much as they want.

What is the ruling on shaving the head of the newborn?

It is desirable to shave the head of the newborn on the seventh day from delivery, and the weight of his/her hair is given in gold , or silver as charity.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who purchases a sacrificial animal (uḍḥiyah) and it then develops a defect before slaughter?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a defect that invalidates the sacrifice (uḍḥiyah) arises after its purchase — for example, if one purchased a sound, defect-free animal, and it then developed a limp, blindness in one eye, or a similar defect before slaughter — it does not fulfill the requirement of a valid uḍḥiyah, according to the Shāfi'ī school.
It is stated in Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib (Vol.1/P.535): "Even if the limp develops [in the animal] while the knife is upon it, it still does not fulfill the requirement, because it is lame at the moment of slaughter — this is analogous to a case where a sheep's leg breaks and one hastens to slaughter it [in that condition]."
The Ḥanbalī school, however, held that if the one offering the sacrifice purchased the animal while it was sound and defect-free, and a defect then befell it afterward, the sacrifice remains valid and there is no obligation to replace it.
It is stated in Masā'il al-Imām Aḥmad, one of the Ḥanbalī reference works (Vol.8/P.4021): "I said: If a person purchases the sacrificial animal while it is sound, and it is then afflicted with illness, blindness in one eye, or a broken limb [before slaughter]? He [Imam Aḥmad] said: It is said that it still fulfills the requirement. Isḥāq said likewise, because he purchased it while sound, and the defect befell it only afterward, so it remains sufficient on his behalf." [End of quote]
Accordingly, a sheep afflicted with a defect that invalidates the sacrifice does not fulfill the requirement of a valid uḍḥiyah — whether the defect arose after purchase or during the slaughter itself — according to the Shāfi'ī school. However, there is no objection to following the Ḥanbalī position on this matter [as a valid alternative]. And Allah, the Most High, knows best.

See More