عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Islamic Finance According to the Dinar Standard Report 2021/2022
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 11-09-2022

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Islamic Finance According to the Dinar Standard Report 2021/2022

 

COVID-19 pandemic had an evident impact on the economic, social, and political sectors of life. The Islamic finance sector is a key contributor to economic life worldwide, given its development and incremental aspects of growth in recent years.

Amongst the most important and precise technical studies indicating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Islamic finance (2021/2022) in numbers is the report prepared by Dinar Standard in partnership with Salam Gateway with the support of DIEDC. This report was published by the International Islamic Center for Reconciliation and Arbitration (IICRA) in Dubai, Edition No. (19), 4rth quarter, 1443 H/June 2022.

The key points of this report are:

First: The value of Islamic finance assets in 2019 has risen from 2.52 trillion US dollars to 2.88 trillion US dollars amounting to 13.9%. The report expected this sector to recover over the coming five years with an overall growth by 5%.

Second: The rapid growth of the Islamic Takaful insurance, especially in the Gulf countries and Indonesia.

Third: 2020 witnessed a large number of initiatives and measures that help enhance the growth of Islamic finance, particularly in the countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. In addition, it was decided to establish new Islamic banks in countries such as Tajikistan, Uganda and the Philippines, in addition to digital banks in Kazakhstan and Malaysia.

Fourth: The investment of Islamic Financial Technology as well as the combination Islamic financial institutions through out possession and combination that reached 4.93bn. in 2019 to 2020.

Fifth: The activity of the Islamic Sukuk decreased but didn`t stop where it was announced that new Sukuk were issued in south Africa, Nigeria, Britain, Gulf and south east Asia countries.

Sixth: Developing the sector of social finance through collective funding, fostering partnerships between the private and public sectors or supporting small and medium-sized finance institutions. 

Based on the above notes, the following can be noticed:

  1. Despite the fact that the report was prepared during the COVID-19 pandemic, Islamic finance has witnessed an evident growth and recovery is expected in the coming years. In the same year of preparing this report, the number of the Islamic finance institutions has reached 1462.
  2. Adopting social finance that rests on Takaful and cooperation between people to ease their problems, as is the case with Zakah (Alms giving) and Sadqah (Voluntary charity) and providing financial support to small and medium-sized financial institutions. Moreover, partnership between the private and public sectors is an example of this form of finance. New platforms have been established for collective funding between counterparts in Britain and Malaysia, and an initiative was launched to benefit from social Islamic finance in the UN in partnership with the Islamic Bank for Development in 2021 (news.UN.org).
  3. The COVID-19 pandemic encouraged Islamic finance to develop financial technology through modern electronic platforms, digital banks, and distinguished services of digital banking.
  4. Islami Sukuk have witnessed a remarkable growth within the recent years. As indicated by the report, this product hasn`t stopped despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic where their issuance was resumed in several countries. Here, it is worth pointing that later in the year 2021, the fourth issuance of the Sukuk for the Murabah to the purchase orderer were issued in favor of the Jordan National Electricity Company to fund the energy sector with a total value of 225 million JDs by an annual Murabaha percentage of 3.55% over five years.

Unequivocally, these notes indicate that the Islamic finance sector is replete with Sharia, technical, and legal competencies enabling it to face difficult situations, such as COVID-19 pandemic to create an opportunity to keep abreast with developments, innovate new products to address the needs of the people, and continue Islamic finance services.  

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

A woman made a wig for herself from her own [previously shed] hair, which she wears on her head after having lost her hair [due to hair loss]. Is this permissible?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Since the hair belongs to the woman herself, the wig can be removed during the obligatory ghusl (ritual bathing), and part of the head can still be wiped during wuḍū' (ablution), there is no sharī‘ah objection to making this wig — provided she does not appear wearing it in front of non-maḥram men (Any males outside a woman's immediate family whom she is permitted to marry under Islamic law), since it is not permissible for them to look at a woman's detached hair.
It is stated in Rawḍat aṭ-Ṭālibīn wa ‘Umdat al-Muftīn: "Whatever it is not permissible to look at while still attached [to the body] — such as the male genitalia, a free woman's forearm, the hair of her head, and a man's pubic hair, and similar matters — it remains unlawful to look at even after it has been detached [from the body], according to the more correct position (al-aṣaḥḥ)." And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

Is it permissible to agree with a butcher to purchase the meat of an animal after it has been slaughtered — for instance, by buying the meat of a sheep at a price determined by the weight of its meat following slaughter, at a fixed rate per kilogram? And what is the ruling if the animal is being purchased with the intention of it being an uḍḥiyyah (sacrificial offering)?

 
 
 
 
 

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is not permissible to sell livestock in the manner of pricing each kilogram of meat after slaughter at a fixed rate, because the meat within the animal prior to slaughter is unseen and unknown. This leads to jahālah (ignorance of the subject matter) and gharar (contractual uncertainty), both of which are among the invalidating factors in sales transactions.
However, it is permissible for the buyer to issue a promise to purchase the meat of the animal after slaughter at a specified price per kilogram, with the actual sale being concluded at the time of weighing the meat — at which point both the quantity of the goods and the total price become known. There is no Sharī'ah objection to this arrangement.
The jurists have stipulated that for a sale to be valid, both countervalues must be present and observable. Al-Khaṭīb al-Shirbīnī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states:
"It is valid to sell a heap of grain whose total measure is unknown to both contracting parties at a rate of one sā' per dirham. This sale is valid because the subject of sale is present and observable, and ignorance of the total price is not harmful since it is known in detail — and uncertainty is thereby lifted."— [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol.2/P.355]
As for the uḍḥiyyah, the 'aqīqah, and vowed blood sacrifices (al-dam al-mandhūr) — full ownership of the animal must be established prior to slaughter. It is not valid for such animals to be slaughtered while still in the ownership of the butcher. Rather, the animal must be purchased alive and then slaughtered with the intention of uḍḥiyyah or the like. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

Should the Zakah (obligatory charity) giver tell the poor recipient that this is the Zakah of his money?

No, he shouldn`t. But, the Zakah giver should make an intention in his heart that it is the Zakah of his money when paying it to the poor. And Allah Knows Best.

See More