عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

Realism of Islamic Legislation
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 09-03-2016

 

 

Realism of Islamic Legislation and its Different Aspects

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

 

Realism of Islamic legislation means: "Observing the reality present in legislation and addressing its issues." [Introduction to Sharia and Fiqh, pp.110, Al-Qaradawi].

 

In each of its divisions, Islamic legislation is realistic since it is neither imaginary nor idealistic; rather, it copes with the nature of man whom Allah has entrusted with delivering the message of Islam.

 

This realistic nature is among the reasons that drove people to accept Islamic legislation, and it guaranteed its continuity and eligibility for every time and place.

 

The gradual legislation of provisions is one aspect of realism in Islamic legislation, which was revealed while the Arabs were following customs that it didn`t approve of. However, it didn`t ban them from those customs all at once so that they don`t turn away from it; therefore, they were prohibited gradually. This led them to accept this change in custom and behavior and become more inclined to adhere to Sharia without adamancy or hardship, [Introduction to Islamic Fiqh, pp.15, Madkour].

 

For example, wine, which the Arabs adored, was prohibited on gradual basis. The following verse was revealed in Makkah, it states (What means): "And from the fruit of the date-palm and the vine, ye get out wholesome drink and food: behold, in this also is a sign for those who are wise." [An`nahil/67]. As a result, Muslims used to drink it and it was permissible for them to do so.

 

Afterwards, the following verse was revealed, it states (What means): "They ask thee concerning wine and gambling. Say: "In them is great sin, and some profit, for men; but the sin is greater than the profit." [Al-Baqarah/219]. As a result, some drank it, but others didn`t. After that, the following verse was revealed, it Says (What means): "O ye who believe! Approach not prayers with a mind befogged, until ye can understand all that ye say,- " [An-Nisa/43].

 

As a result, the number of drinkers decreased. Finally, the following verse was revealed, declaring that wine is prohibited as it Says (What means): "O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination, - of Satan’s handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. Satan’s plan is (but) to excite enmity and hatred between you, with intoxicants and gambling, and hinder you from the remembrance of Allah, and from prayer: will ye not then abstain?" [Al-Mai`da/90-91].

 

After the revealation of the above verse, Omar Ibn Al-Khattab (May Allah Be Pleased with him) said: "Ooh Allah, sure we abstained." [Mafatih Al-Ghayb vol.6/pp.395].

 

Another aspect of realism in Islamic legislation is lifting religious difficulties because among the principles of legislation is that the responsible Muslim should be capable of performing the religious duties required from him, at first. However, when hardship arises from performing some of these duties, the Lawgiver enjoys the authority to lift them. Allah, The Almighty, Said (What means): "and has imposed no difficulties on you in religion." [Al-Hajj/78].

 

Al-Imam Ashatibi said: "Evidence supporting relieving the Muslim nation from the religious difficulties is conclusive." [Almowafakat Fi Osool Al-Sharia, vol.1/pp.213, Ash-shatibi].

 

Moreover, Islamic legislation draws up general rules for most transactions. For instance, most texts pertaining to the provisions governing different transactions are general, taking into consideration the change in people`s interests due to changes in time and place. However, religious texts (Quran and Sunna) introduced the general rules and left the details to the Ijtihad (Independent reasoning) of the scholars to address any new or sudden issues. For instance, forbidding Riba (Usury), cheating, eating up people`s property unjustly and the like.

 

In conclusion, realism is among the characteristics of Islamic legislation, and it has been manifested in three key aspects: gradualism, mitigation, lifting difficulties in religious duties, and drawing up general rules on various transactions. Being realistic in legislations and rulings (Lawful or unlawful) makes Islamic Sharia a blessing that Allah has bestowed upon Muslims because it aims to lead them to the path of righteousness to win His pleasure and enter paradise; therefore, we should be thankful to Allah and adhere to His Sharia in our word and deed.

 

And All praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds and may His Blessings and Peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions. 

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling of Islam on swearing by Allah without intending to take an actual oath?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
If someone swears by Allah without intending to take an actual oath, and without the firm resolve to bind themselves to it, then there is no sin or expiation (Kaffarah) required of them. Allah the Exalted says {what means}: 'God will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.' [Al-Baqarah/225]. However, a Muslim should avoid swearing oaths excessively so that their tongue does not become accustomed to it. Allah the Exalted says {what means}: 'And make not God’s (name) an excuse in your oaths against doing good, or acting rightly, or making peace between persons; for God is One Who heareth and knoweth all things.
' [Al-Baqarah/224]. And Allah the Exalted knows best."

A man led the people in prayer as imam, and at the end of the prayer he performed a prostration of forgetfulness (*sujūd al-sahw*) because he had omitted a short *sūrah* after al-Fātiḥah. What is the ruling on his prayer and that of those praying behind him?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
According to the Shāfiʿī school, it is sunnah to recite a sūrah after al-Fātiḥah in the prayer. One who omits it has a valid prayer, and no prostration of forgetfulness (sujūd al-sahw) is prescribed for omitting it. If someone performs sujūd al-sahw for its omission while knowing the ruling and remembering it, his prayer is invalidated. But one who is ignorant of the ruling, or who did so out of forgetfulness, his prayer is not invalidated, because this is among the matters that are obscure to people, and ignorance of it is not restricted to those who recently entered Islam.
Shaykh al-Islām al-Shams al-Ramlī said in Nihāyat al-Muḥtāj ilā Sharḥ al-Minhāj (Vol.2/p.70): “The remaining sunnahs are not compensated for by prostration, such as the remembrances (adhkār) of bowing and prostration, that is, the opening supplication (duʿāʾ al-iftitāḥ) and the sūrah, in accordance with the base rule, because they are not of the same nature as what has been reported [as compensable]. If one prostrates for any of them deliberately, his prayer is invalidated, unless he is excused due to ignorance. As for the objection raised that the ignorant person does not know that sujūd al-sahw is prescribed, and whoever knows it knows its place, this is refuted by denying such a necessary connection, for the ignorant person may hear only that sujūd al-sahw is prescribed before the salām, and so assume that it applies to every sunnah and is not restricted to its prescribed place.”
This is among the matters that are obscure, in which the mukallaf is excused for ignorance, as stated by al-Shabrāmallisī in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā Nihāyat al-Muḥtāj (Vol.2/p.70).
However, if the imam prostrates, and the follower (maʾmūm) presumes that his imam’s prostration is for a reason for which one does not prostrate, it is not permissible to follow him in it, so long as the follower knows the ruling.
Accordingly, the prayer of one who did not recite a sūrah after al-Fātiḥah is valid, and sujūd al-sahw is not prescribed for it. Whoever prostrates out of ignorance or forgetfulness, his prayer is valid, because this is among the issues hidden from the general public. But whoever prostrates while knowing the ruling and remembering it, his prayer is invalidated. And Allah Almighty knows best.

I read the Qudsī ḥadīth: "Whoever breaks his wuḍūʾ and does not perform ablution has shown me harshness; whoever performs ablution and does not pray has shown me harshness; whoever prays and does not supplicate to Me has shown me harshness; and whoever supplicates to Me and I do not answer him, then I have been harsh to him, and I am not a harsh Lord." What is the authenticity of this ḥadīth?

 

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
This ḥadīth was mentioned by al-Ṣaghānī (may Allah have mercy on him) in al-Mawḍūʿāt (p. 43), where he said: “Among them is their saying: ‘Whoever breaks his wuḍūʾ and does not perform ablution has shown me harshness; whoever performs ablution and does not pray has shown me harshness; (whoever prays and does not supplicate to Me has shown me harshness); and whoever supplicates to Me and I do not answer him, then I have been harsh to him, and I am not a harsh Lord.’”
Al-ʿAjlūnī (may Allah have mercy on him) cited what al-Ṣaghānī said in Kashf al-Khafāʾ (Vol.2/p.264). And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on one who vows to fast a specific or non-specific year? Are the two Eids, the days of Tashreeq, Ramadan, and the days of menstruation and postnatal bleeding included in them? And do these days break the consecutiveness if it was intended?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
If someone makes a vow (Nadr) to fast a specific, designated year, this vow does not include the days of Eid, the days of Tashreeq (the three days following Eid al-Adha), Ramadan, or the days of menstruation (Hayd) and postnatal bleeding (Nifas). Furthermore, there is no requirement to make up (Qada) these specific days.
 
However, if someone vows to fast a year that is not specifically designated (i.e., any twelve-month period) and stipulates that the fasting must be consecutive, they are bound by that condition. They must not fast on the days of Eid, during Ramadan, or during menstruation, but they are required to make up these days afterward—with the exception of the days of menstruation and postnatal bleeding, which do not need to be made up.
 
It is stated in Hashiyat al-Bajuri ‘ala Sharh Ibn Qasim ({Vol.2/P.606): 'If one vows to fast a specific year, the Eid, Tashreeq, Ramadan, and days of menstruation or postnatal bleeding are not included. This is because Ramadan does not accept any fast other than its own, and the others do not accept fasting at all. Therefore, they do not enter into the vow, and no makeup is required for them because they are legally excluded—contrary to Al-Rafi’i regarding menstruation and postnatal bleeding.
 
If one vows to fast a non-designated year: if they stipulated consecutiveness (Tatuabu’) in their vow, they must fulfill it; otherwise, they are not bound to it. Consecutiveness is not broken by the days that do not enter into the specific year vow (Eid, Tashreeq, Ramadan, menstruation, and postnatal bleeding). However, one must make up the days missed—excluding the time of menstruation and postnatal bleeding—immediately following the end of the year. As for the time of menstruation and postnatal bleeding, it is not made up, contrary to Ibn al-Rif’ah, who argued that it must be made up just like Ramadan.' And Allah the Exalted knows best.

See More