عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

Realism of Islamic Legislation
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 09-03-2016

 

 

Realism of Islamic Legislation and its Different Aspects

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

 

Realism of Islamic legislation means: "Observing the reality present in legislation and addressing its issues." [Introduction to Sharia and Fiqh, pp.110, Al-Qaradawi].

 

In each of its divisions, Islamic legislation is realistic since it is neither imaginary nor idealistic; rather, it copes with the nature of man whom Allah has entrusted with delivering the message of Islam.

 

This realistic nature is among the reasons that drove people to accept Islamic legislation, and it guaranteed its continuity and eligibility for every time and place.

 

The gradual legislation of provisions is one aspect of realism in Islamic legislation, which was revealed while the Arabs were following customs that it didn`t approve of. However, it didn`t ban them from those customs all at once so that they don`t turn away from it; therefore, they were prohibited gradually. This led them to accept this change in custom and behavior and become more inclined to adhere to Sharia without adamancy or hardship, [Introduction to Islamic Fiqh, pp.15, Madkour].

 

For example, wine, which the Arabs adored, was prohibited on gradual basis. The following verse was revealed in Makkah, it states (What means): "And from the fruit of the date-palm and the vine, ye get out wholesome drink and food: behold, in this also is a sign for those who are wise." [An`nahil/67]. As a result, Muslims used to drink it and it was permissible for them to do so.

 

Afterwards, the following verse was revealed, it states (What means): "They ask thee concerning wine and gambling. Say: "In them is great sin, and some profit, for men; but the sin is greater than the profit." [Al-Baqarah/219]. As a result, some drank it, but others didn`t. After that, the following verse was revealed, it Says (What means): "O ye who believe! Approach not prayers with a mind befogged, until ye can understand all that ye say,- " [An-Nisa/43].

 

As a result, the number of drinkers decreased. Finally, the following verse was revealed, declaring that wine is prohibited as it Says (What means): "O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination, - of Satan’s handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. Satan’s plan is (but) to excite enmity and hatred between you, with intoxicants and gambling, and hinder you from the remembrance of Allah, and from prayer: will ye not then abstain?" [Al-Mai`da/90-91].

 

After the revealation of the above verse, Omar Ibn Al-Khattab (May Allah Be Pleased with him) said: "Ooh Allah, sure we abstained." [Mafatih Al-Ghayb vol.6/pp.395].

 

Another aspect of realism in Islamic legislation is lifting religious difficulties because among the principles of legislation is that the responsible Muslim should be capable of performing the religious duties required from him, at first. However, when hardship arises from performing some of these duties, the Lawgiver enjoys the authority to lift them. Allah, The Almighty, Said (What means): "and has imposed no difficulties on you in religion." [Al-Hajj/78].

 

Al-Imam Ashatibi said: "Evidence supporting relieving the Muslim nation from the religious difficulties is conclusive." [Almowafakat Fi Osool Al-Sharia, vol.1/pp.213, Ash-shatibi].

 

Moreover, Islamic legislation draws up general rules for most transactions. For instance, most texts pertaining to the provisions governing different transactions are general, taking into consideration the change in people`s interests due to changes in time and place. However, religious texts (Quran and Sunna) introduced the general rules and left the details to the Ijtihad (Independent reasoning) of the scholars to address any new or sudden issues. For instance, forbidding Riba (Usury), cheating, eating up people`s property unjustly and the like.

 

In conclusion, realism is among the characteristics of Islamic legislation, and it has been manifested in three key aspects: gradualism, mitigation, lifting difficulties in religious duties, and drawing up general rules on various transactions. Being realistic in legislations and rulings (Lawful or unlawful) makes Islamic Sharia a blessing that Allah has bestowed upon Muslims because it aims to lead them to the path of righteousness to win His pleasure and enter paradise; therefore, we should be thankful to Allah and adhere to His Sharia in our word and deed.

 

And All praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds and may His Blessings and Peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions. 

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

Is it obligatory for someone traveling by plane in the afternoon during Ramadan to fast?

Anyone who intends to travel after dawn must begin the day fasting and continue with the intention of completing their fast, as fasting was obligatory upon them before traveling.
However, if they experience unbearable hardship after starting their journey, they are permitted to break their fast due to that hardship, not merely because of travel. In such a case, they must make up for the missed fast later.

What is permissible for the person who wants to ask for a woman`s hand in marriage to see from her body?

He is permitted to see her hands and face only, but if he wants to see more, then he has to send a woman that he trusts to do so.

What is the ruling on praying alone (munfaridan) in a row, and what should I do if I enter the mosque together with another person, and there is only a single gap in the first row with no second row present — should I fill that gap in the first row, or should I stand together with him in a new second row?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
If a person enters [the congregation] and finds no space available in the row, it is recommended for him — after making his opening takbīr for the prayer — to gently pull someone from the row in front of him to pray alongside him, provided he senses that this person would be agreeable to it. If that person does not agree, then he prays alone, and there is no dislike attached to his doing so in that case.
If he ends up praying alone [behind the row], it is sunnah for him to stand directly behind the imam. Then, if someone else arrives, that person stands to his right; and whoever comes after them stands to his left — and so on — such that the imam remains centered in the middle of the row. This is done so that everyone attains the reward of congregational prayer.
As for the case where two people enter the prayer together, and there is a gap in the row wide enough for only one person, then the two of them should pray together in a new row [of their own], and whoever arrives after them should fill that original gap. This is because if only one of the two fills the gap, the other would end up praying alone [which is to be avoided when it can easily be prevented].
Al-Khaṭīb ash-Shirbīnī (raḥimahullāh) said in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.1/P.494): "If he does not find space, then it is recommended for him, while still standing, to gently pull a single person from the row toward himself after making his opening takbīr — out of caution, so as to avoid the position held by some scholars that a person's prayer standing alone behind the row is not valid.
Az-Zarkashī and others said: this should only be done if it seems he would agree to it; otherwise, he should not pull anyone — indeed, doing so becomes impermissible, out of fear of causing discord (fitnah). It is recommended for the person being pulled to cooperate and agree, so that he may attain the reward of assisting in righteousness and piety (al-birr wat-taqwā). However, he should not pull one of two people [praying together] from the row, since this would cause one of them to end up praying alone. This is why the 'pulling' described here takes place only after the opening takbīr [i.e., once the person doing the pulling has already validly begun his own prayer]."
Accordingly: it is sunnah for you to pray alongside the person praying alone, and then, if someone else arrives afterward, you may go and fill the gap in the original row. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on waiving a debt owed by a debtor and counting it toward zakāh?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Waiving a debt owed by a debtor, with the intention of counting it toward zakāh, does not fulfill the zakāh obligation. Rather, it constitutes an ordinary act of charity, for which Allah rewards the giver generously — since one of the conditions for the validity of zakāh is that the person paying it must form the intention of zakāh at the actual moment the wealth is paid out. In this case, the debt has already been established as a standing obligation upon the borrower, so it is not valid to simply redirect the intention toward zakāh after the fact.
It is preferable, instead, for the creditor to first collect the debt from the debtor, and then return to him the amount of money he is required to pay as zakāh — or a portion of it — if the debtor happens to fall under one of the eight categories that Allah, the Exalted, has commanded be given from zakāh.
It is stated in ‘Umdat as-Sālik, from the books of the Shāfi‘ī school: "If someone gives [money] to a poor person, stipulating that the recipient return it to him in payment of a debt owed to him, or says, 'I am making what you owe me into zakāh, so take it [as such]' — this is not valid. But if he gives it to him with the [unstated] intention that the recipient will use it to repay him, or says, 'Repay what you owe me, so that I may [then separately] give it to you as zakāh,' or the debtor himself says, 'Give it to me, so that I may [then] repay you with it' — this is valid, and there is no binding obligation for the recipient to actually fulfill this [informal understanding]." And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

See More