عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(196): "The Permissibility of Levying Administrative Fees for the Loans Taken from the Governorates Development Fund"

Date Added : 25-11-2015

 

Resolution No.(196)(5/2014) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

"The Permissibility of Levying Administrative Fees for the Loans Taken from the Governorates Development Fund"

Date: 17/Rabee` Al-Awal/1435 AH, corresponding to 17/2/2014.

 

All perfect praise is due to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions:

On the above date, the Board reviewed the letter of the Jordan Enterprise Development Corporation, which reads as follows:

The Governorates Development Fund offers financing through an interest-free loan (Hassan), up to (70%) from the overall cost of the enterprise. The loanee is required to repay in installments over a period of eight years, including a two-year grace period. This is in order to re-use that same amount for financing new enterprises to benefit as many individuals as possible. Moreover, up to (10%) of the enterprise`s profit is deducted in case a profit was produced so as to protect the capital of the Fund to guarantee its continuity, because it is usually used for re-loaning, and no profits are redistributed, or given back to the government. In case of loss, the installments of the interest-free loan are to be repaid, without adding any interest, or profit, and it is possible to delay repayment if the loanee is in a hard up and after examining the reasons for his loss. Based on the afore-said, what is the ruling of Sharia as regards this financing mechanism adopted by the Jordan Enterprise Development Corporation?

After researching and deliberating, the Board decided what follows:

Offering loans to owners of small businesses is an accepted act of charity. It achieves comprehensive development, uproots poverty, increases individual productivity, and helps develop the areas where these enterprises are established.

Therefore, the financing mechanism adopted in the above question is an instance of clear Riba (usury) which has been prohibited by Allah, The Almighty, and His Messenger. It is impermissible for the above Fund to receive a percentage from the profits of the enterprises it finances. However, it is permissible to calculate the actual costs of offering these loans and collecting them, such as salaries of employees, paperwork, rent.. etc. but without the smallest addition, and this could be achieved through imposing a fixed amount of administrative fees. These shouldn`t be tied with the loan`s repayment period, or the enterprise`s profit; rather, they should be tied with the costs necessary for securing the continuity of the Fund, without making any profit by the loaning party. In fact, the Jordan Iftaa` Department, the accredited Fiqh assemblies, and the religious institutions have issued many Facosststwas that permit charging the loanee for the administrative fees of the loan since we believe that it  is the most suitable solution from the perspective of Islamic Sharia. We pray that Allah, The Exalted, Favors us and the Fund`s administrative board with success in serving the community and that their business remains within the boundaries of what is lawful. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, The Mufti General of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, His Grace Sheikh Abdulkareem Al-Khasawneh.

Prof. Hayel Abdulhafeez/ Member

Dr. Yahia Al-Botoosh/ Member

His Eminence, Sheikh Sa`ied Hijjawi/ Member

Prof. Mohammad Al-Qudat/ Member

Prof. Abduln`nassir Abu Al Bass`al/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Zou`bi/ Member

Dr.Wasif Al-Bak`kri/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair Al-Esa

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on one who vows to fast a specific or non-specific year? Are the two Eids, the days of Tashreeq, Ramadan, and the days of menstruation and postnatal bleeding included in them? And do these days break the consecutiveness if it was intended?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
If someone makes a vow (Nadr) to fast a specific, designated year, this vow does not include the days of Eid, the days of Tashreeq (the three days following Eid al-Adha), Ramadan, or the days of menstruation (Hayd) and postnatal bleeding (Nifas). Furthermore, there is no requirement to make up (Qada) these specific days.
 
However, if someone vows to fast a year that is not specifically designated (i.e., any twelve-month period) and stipulates that the fasting must be consecutive, they are bound by that condition. They must not fast on the days of Eid, during Ramadan, or during menstruation, but they are required to make up these days afterward—with the exception of the days of menstruation and postnatal bleeding, which do not need to be made up.
 
It is stated in Hashiyat al-Bajuri ‘ala Sharh Ibn Qasim ({Vol.2/P.606): 'If one vows to fast a specific year, the Eid, Tashreeq, Ramadan, and days of menstruation or postnatal bleeding are not included. This is because Ramadan does not accept any fast other than its own, and the others do not accept fasting at all. Therefore, they do not enter into the vow, and no makeup is required for them because they are legally excluded—contrary to Al-Rafi’i regarding menstruation and postnatal bleeding.
 
If one vows to fast a non-designated year: if they stipulated consecutiveness (Tatuabu’) in their vow, they must fulfill it; otherwise, they are not bound to it. Consecutiveness is not broken by the days that do not enter into the specific year vow (Eid, Tashreeq, Ramadan, menstruation, and postnatal bleeding). However, one must make up the days missed—excluding the time of menstruation and postnatal bleeding—immediately following the end of the year. As for the time of menstruation and postnatal bleeding, it is not made up, contrary to Ibn al-Rif’ah, who argued that it must be made up just like Ramadan.' And Allah the Exalted knows best.

What is the ruling on one who doubts washing a limb before or after finishing ablution?

If a person performing ablution doubts leaving the washing of a limb from the limbs of ablution during his ablution, he must repeat washing that limb and wash what comes after it. If he doubts leaving the washing of a limb after finishing the ablution, there is nothing upon him. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for one who sacrifices on behalf of another, with the latter's permission, to eat from the sacrifice?

It is permissible for someone who sacrificed on behalf of another with their permission to eat from it with their permission, and they stand in their place (act as their representative) in distributing it.
 
It is stated in Nihayat al-Muhtaj ila Sharh al-Minhaj (Vol.8/P.141): "And he—meaning the one sacrificing on his own behalf, provided he has not apostatized—has the right to eat from a voluntary sacrifice and his sacrificial gift; rather, it is recommended. As for an obligatory sacrifice, it is forbidden for him to eat from it, whether it was designated as such initially or as a liability in his dhimmah. And excluded by what has preceded is if he sacrifices on behalf of another, or if he apostatized, then it is not permissible for him to eat from it, just as it is absolutely impermissible to feed a disbeliever from it."(The text I found indicates the impermissibility of eating) ???
 
And it is stated in Hashiyat al-Jamal ‘ala Sharh al-Manhaj (Vol.5/P.262): "If a person offers a sacrifice on behalf of a living person with their permission, does he act as their representative in distributing it—on the grounds that permission to sacrifice is permission to distribute it—or does it depend on their explicit permission? This requires consideration, but the first view is not far-fetched." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is Aqeeqah?

It is the sheep slaughtered on the seventh day from the child`s birth, and it is a confirmed Sunnah after the Prophet (PBUH).

See More