عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(196): "The Permissibility of Levying Administrative Fees for the Loans Taken from the Governorates Development Fund"

Date Added : 25-11-2015

 

Resolution No.(196)(5/2014) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

"The Permissibility of Levying Administrative Fees for the Loans Taken from the Governorates Development Fund"

Date: 17/Rabee` Al-Awal/1435 AH, corresponding to 17/2/2014.

 

All perfect praise is due to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions:

On the above date, the Board reviewed the letter of the Jordan Enterprise Development Corporation, which reads as follows:

The Governorates Development Fund offers financing through an interest-free loan (Hassan), up to (70%) from the overall cost of the enterprise. The loanee is required to repay in installments over a period of eight years, including a two-year grace period. This is in order to re-use that same amount for financing new enterprises to benefit as many individuals as possible. Moreover, up to (10%) of the enterprise`s profit is deducted in case a profit was produced so as to protect the capital of the Fund to guarantee its continuity, because it is usually used for re-loaning, and no profits are redistributed, or given back to the government. In case of loss, the installments of the interest-free loan are to be repaid, without adding any interest, or profit, and it is possible to delay repayment if the loanee is in a hard up and after examining the reasons for his loss. Based on the afore-said, what is the ruling of Sharia as regards this financing mechanism adopted by the Jordan Enterprise Development Corporation?

After researching and deliberating, the Board decided what follows:

Offering loans to owners of small businesses is an accepted act of charity. It achieves comprehensive development, uproots poverty, increases individual productivity, and helps develop the areas where these enterprises are established.

Therefore, the financing mechanism adopted in the above question is an instance of clear Riba (usury) which has been prohibited by Allah, The Almighty, and His Messenger. It is impermissible for the above Fund to receive a percentage from the profits of the enterprises it finances. However, it is permissible to calculate the actual costs of offering these loans and collecting them, such as salaries of employees, paperwork, rent.. etc. but without the smallest addition, and this could be achieved through imposing a fixed amount of administrative fees. These shouldn`t be tied with the loan`s repayment period, or the enterprise`s profit; rather, they should be tied with the costs necessary for securing the continuity of the Fund, without making any profit by the loaning party. In fact, the Jordan Iftaa` Department, the accredited Fiqh assemblies, and the religious institutions have issued many Facosststwas that permit charging the loanee for the administrative fees of the loan since we believe that it  is the most suitable solution from the perspective of Islamic Sharia. We pray that Allah, The Exalted, Favors us and the Fund`s administrative board with success in serving the community and that their business remains within the boundaries of what is lawful. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, The Mufti General of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, His Grace Sheikh Abdulkareem Al-Khasawneh.

Prof. Hayel Abdulhafeez/ Member

Dr. Yahia Al-Botoosh/ Member

His Eminence, Sheikh Sa`ied Hijjawi/ Member

Prof. Mohammad Al-Qudat/ Member

Prof. Abduln`nassir Abu Al Bass`al/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Zou`bi/ Member

Dr.Wasif Al-Bak`kri/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair Al-Esa

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the Islamic ruling on the aqiqa?

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
The 'aqīqah is a confirmed Sunnah (sunnah mu'akkadah). Two sheep are to be slaughtered for a newborn boy, and one sheep for a newborn girl. This is established by numerous Prophetic traditions, among them:
The narration of Samurah ibn Jundub, may Allah be pleased with him, who reported that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Every child is held in pledge for his 'aqīqah, which is slaughtered on his behalf on the seventh day, and he is named, and his head is shaved." — Narrated by al-Tirmidhī, who graded it as ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ.
And the narration of 'Ā'ishah, may Allah be pleased with her, who said: "The Messenger of Allah ﷺ commanded us to slaughter one sheep as 'aqīqah for a girl, and two sheep for a boy." — Narrated by Aḥmad and Ibn Mājah.
The imperative in these narrations is understood to denote recommendation rather than obligation, based on the ḥadīth of 'Amr ibn Shu'ayb, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, who said: The Messenger of Allah ﷺ was asked about the 'aqīqah, whereupon he said: "Allah does not love 'uqūq" — as though he disliked the name itself — and then said: "Whoever has a child born to him and wishes to offer a sacrifice on their behalf, let them do so: two equivalent sheep for a boy, and one sheep for a girl." — Narrated by Aḥmad and Abū Dāwūd.
The legal inference drawn from this narration is that the Prophet ﷺ linked the slaughter to the wish and willingness of the individual, saying: "whoever wishes to offer a sacrifice... let them do so" — thereby indicating that the 'aqīqah is recommended (mustaḥabb) and not obligatory (wājib).
And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on delaying Zakat al-Fitr until after Eid day?

It is forbidden to delay Zakat al-Fitr beyond the sunset of Eid day. If someone delays it past Eid day without a valid excuse, they have committed a sin and must immediately make up for it because their obligation remains unfulfilled, and they must clear their responsibility.

How should I deal with the whispers of the devil with regard to ablution and purity?

Whispers in ablution are from the devil, and so you should take refuge in Allah from the devil`s evil suggestions that aim to distort the religion. Thus, once an organ is completely pure, don`t question its purity since having whispers doesn`t mean that the purity is invalid as it has already been established.

Is it permissible to offer an Udhiyah on behalf of the deceased?

In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Offering an Udhiyah (sacrificial animal) on behalf of a deceased person is permissible. This is the official position of the Hanbali school (as stated in Kashshaf al-Qina’ by al-Bahuti,Vol.6/P.428) and was also upheld by the prominent Shafi'i scholar Al-’Abbadi (mentioned in Bidayat al-Muhtaj by Ibn Qadi Shuhbah,Vol. 4/P.358). It has likewise been narrated as a valid view among some Maliki and Hanafi scholars.
 
In fact, Imam Abu Dawud dedicated an entire chapter in his Sunan collection entitled, "Chapter on Sacrificing on Behalf of the Deceased." In it, he recorded a narration from Hanash, who said: "I saw 'Ali sacrificing two rams, so I asked him, 'What is this?' He replied, 'The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to offer a sacrifice on his behalf, so I am sacrificing on his behalf.'"
 
Imam Abu Dawud also narrated from Jabir (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "O Allah, this is from You, for You, and on behalf of Muhammad and his Ummah (community). In the Name of Allah, and Allah is the Greatest," and he then slaughtered the animal.
 
The textual evidence here lies in the fact that our Master, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), offered a sacrifice on behalf of his entire community—and it is well-established that his community includes those who have already passed away.
 
Furthermore, there is an abundance of sacred texts demonstrating that the rewards of righteous deeds reach the deceased. For instance, it is permissible to fast on behalf of a deceased person who passed away with missed obligatory fasts, and it is equally permissible to perform Hajj on their behalf, both of which are firmly established in authentic Hadiths. Therefore, if the reward of fasting (which is a purely physical act of worship) and Hajj (which is a joint physical and financial act of worship) can reach the deceased, then the reward of an Udhiyah reaches them with greater reason (by way of A Fortiori argument). This is because it is a purely financial act of worship, falling under the general category of charity (Sadaqah).
 
Additionally, scholars have reached a consensus (Ijma') that the rewards of charity reach the deceased, and since the Udhiyah is inherently an act of charity, it falls under the same ruling. Consequently, based on all the aforementioned evidence, we hold the view that offering a sacrifice on behalf of the deceased is entirely permissible. And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

See More